I didn't know this but if a man signs a birth certificate he's on the hook for the kid, even if it turns out the kid isn't his. Doesn't feel right to pressure someone into this kind of decision without the necessary information to make an informed decision. I imagine you'd be expected to sign before taking the kid home. Plus you'd like have friends and family which would make delaying the process more problematic. Of course that's what a floozy would be banking on, social pressure to get you to act against your own self-interest and to the benefit of hers.

Not doing so only protects loose women. You would think women that are true would be all for this. I really don't know if it's a case of women protecting women no matter what or if an altering number of women have become loose and such a requirement would expose quite a number, either requiring women to control themselves - and if we've learned anything it's that women don't like to move back when they've become "accustomed" to a certain lifestyle - or guys, en masse, becoming disgusted with the whole affair. Of course the ladies will want their cake and to eat it to so they'll try shame and not want the men shame works on, at least not to father her children, he'd be perfect for raising the children cause she can shame him into doing whatever she wants. Just another case of women driving the good men - as in men with self-respect - away and then bemoaning "where have all the good men gone?"

(Note: This isn't the first time I've tried to ask such a question to "mainstream" Reddit and gotten the post automatically banned. Before taking the red pill I thought "no way, I would have heard something." But all this omission. When you silence one voice and only let certain voices be heard you control the flow of information. In particular I can't stand that speaking for the other side cannot be tolerated. Treated like I'm on the wrong side of history when it's those that restrict speech that history doesn't look too kindly upon. If you really hold the strength of your convictions allow a debate to occur. My suspicion is that most people toe the party line. Even if it were the polar opposite they'd abide as to "fit in". I'd like to think - were the positions flipped - I'd have the fortitude to allow for opposing views, of course then I'd be in a superior position so what would I have to fear?)