696,979 posts

Feminism pushes incompetent women forward, by pushing more deserving men behind.

Reddit View
March 21, 2020
47 upvotes

Our school recently had the amazing idea to make a gender-neutral football team. How did they go about doing it? Did they hold open tryouts and select the best players, regardless of gender? No. They chose the best 6 players (who were all boys unsurprisingly) and the remaining 5 were chosen out of the 8 girls who appeared, who can't play to save their lives.

And now people are complaining that there are more boys than girls in the team, and want one boy to be replaced by a girl.


Post Information
Title Feminism pushes incompetent women forward, by pushing more deserving men behind.
Author Deathbysugar2020
Upvotes 47
Comments 12
Date 21 March 2020 04:52 PM UTC (6 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/706952
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/fmhzr7/feminism_pushes_incompetent_women_forward_by/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
feminism
Comments

[–]SavvyVolley615 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy

Feminism is a collective shit test that men, collectively, keep failing by conceding ground out of the goodness of their hearts. It’s irresponsible to let this stupidity go on, and it will because these women will keep pushing this agenda no matter how many times it backfires; it’s literal insanity. And frankly it makes women look so naive and ridiculous.

[–]Deathbysugar2020[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

We can't do much about it though. The people in power won't risk it in fear that they will be accused of sexism and be stripped of their power. It's much simpler for them to just go with the flow and continue making policies favouring women.

[–]SavvyVolley62 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

We lost the war when we gave women a voice in politics. It’s not a sexist thing, and not all women are crazy, but they’re just too delusional collectively to have that kind of power. That’s where most of the polarization comes from now: it’s basically the effeminate political arm vs the masculine. It’s liberal democrat women vs the more conservative republican men, and that’s backed by statistics. It’s femininity operating through men and women (mostly actual women) vs masculinity operating through men and women (mostly men). Now ask yourself, which side is literally infamous for pettiness, Machiavellianism, disingenuousness, cheating, fake virtue signaling, etc? They’re just toxic by nature. Why? Because society means ORDER and ORDER IS MASCULINE; CHAOS IS FEMININE and females are biologically wired to be always testing men (society). The problem is now they have an “equal” voice so their testing is not met with the natural backlash that would otherwise keep them in check. Man they’re innately psychologically abusive and have no place in politics.

For their own good.

[–]laptopdragon2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

seriously, the boys should quit and all the boys should form their own team with blackjack and hookers.

[–]TomToms80 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Women have a 10 times more likely chance of getting accepted in STEM jobs than an equally qualified man which is stupid on so many levels

I don’t have the source rn but could get it if someone really needs it

[–]Deathbysugar2020[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Less women go into STEM fields, by their own choice. Because "woke" companies want equal representation to make themselves look more likeable, women as a result have an easier time getting a job.

[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

You'd think that the point of a football team in school is that they would learn football and get better?

[–]Deathbysugar2020[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I hope your joking. A football team's purpose is to compete with other teams and determine who's the best. If you want to learn football, go take some classes or get someone good to teach you.

[–]VestigialHead-1 points0 points  (3 children) | Copy

Why not make two teams. One can be chosen by the biggest whinger about there being too many boys and the other can be made up of the top people that are graded in a testing environment.

Then the two teams can compete each fortnight against each other to see which is the better strategy for picking a competitive team.

Surely the feminist based team will quickly learn the required skills and be so empathetic towards each other they will make a cohesive team. So after 4-5 matches the fem team should show massive improvement and start beating the sexist team - right?

[–]Deathbysugar2020[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

That's...not how football works. Getting good at a sport requires years of training, and the boys have been training for years to get as good as they are. No way will the "fem" team learn the sport well enough after 4-5 matches and beat the "sexist" team.

Women have got to learn that getting good at anything requires efforts, and less representation of women at many positions is not because they are discriminated against, but because they need to get competent.

[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Uhh yes exactly. That is what my point was. I was being facetious about the feminist based team winning. I was taking the piss out of the fact they seem to think that emotions and empathy is more important than skill and experience.

[–]Deathbysugar2020[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Oh lol, sorry didn't catch the sarcasm



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter