TheRedArchive needs help
With 700,000+ posts and 16,000,000+ comments archived, and new Red Pill content being added every week, keeping TheRedArchive alive and discoverable to everyone is starting to become very costly. As a 20-year-old student who just moved out and is living independently for the first time, keeping TheRedArchive alive is beginning to cost me much more than I thought.

Therefore, if you appreciate the website, have gained a lot of knowledge and insight from it, and want to show your appreciation, you can do so by donating any amount that you want via the options below. The money will be used on the expensive monthly host bill and any future maintenance of the website.
Thank you, and I wish you all a successful 2021 and a good luck with achieving your goals and dreams!

Best, /u/dream-hunter

What does this “violence against women act” entail that isn’t already happening?

Reddit View
December 30, 2019
post image

Post Information
Title What does this “violence against women act” entail that isn’t already happening?
Author username2136
Upvotes 148
Comments 19
Date 30 December 2019 11:25 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Original Link
Similar Posts

[–]SnowconeMafia29 points30 points  (4 children) | Copy

Isn't violence against anyone already illegal?

Why is this bill even necessary?

[–]username2136[S] 16 points17 points  (3 children) | Copy

I read rumors that it seems like an update to an already existing act that will allow trans women into women’s abuse shelters. The rumor also stated that that was the reason the Republican Party was against it. They are worried that a predator could pose as trans and would have his way with the women and the staff couldn’t do shit because the dude said he was trans.

[–]DepravedWalnut11 points12 points  (2 children) | Copy

From my political standpoint, That sounds completely valid.

[–]Terminal-Psychosis7 points8 points  (0 children) | Copy

From an everyday, common sense standpoint too.

[–]username2136[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

I agree too but that was just a rumor. I have no idea whether that is true.

[–]dohnstem9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy

Because this is American politics, I shall be nonaligned in the subject, but I have included a link to the united states bill of those who wish to know more on the subject.

[–]Ryker2151[🍰] 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

Women don't need them men need them because men aren't allowed in almost every single one and the ones they are allowed in are trying to bully them away from the shelters

[–]Egalitarianwhistle3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Not have the support they need for domestic abuse?

So they will be like men?

[–]TraditionalCoffee4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Anyone facing domestic abuse deserves help. Not just a specific type of person or gender.

[–]ulgulanoth4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

True millions of domestic abuse survivors will not have the support they need, but that is because they're men! Women already have a thousand different support groups, programs and safety nets in place.

[–]ANIKAHirsch2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

It’s a way to sneak in privileges for TIMs in women’s spaces, especially by allowing them to enter women’s domestic violence shelters. This is why conservative politicians are voting against it.

[–]username2136[S] 5 points6 points  (5 children) | Copy


[–]ANIKAHirsch4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

Trans-identified males. They usually call themselves “trans women”.

[–]username2136[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children) | Copy

This just sounds like an update to a pre-existing law that was decades ago then if it didn’t include TIMs. Yeah I can definitely see why they would be against that. They have no authentication for whether someone is trans or not so any dude can just walk in there saying he is trans.

[–]ANIKAHirsch2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

It is. It was originally passed in the 90s. Ironically, the new version these “feminists” are pushing for would decrease the funding set aside for female victims.

[–]username2136[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Decrease? Why would they want that?

[–]ANIKAHirsch0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It opens funding previously reserved for women to men who identify as women. I can’t explain why any woman would want that without using the phrase “useful idiots”. But it’s possible that they are misinformed about the nature of the bill.

[–]Stankyboi950 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

If the senate didn’t approve it, it probably not good

[–]username2136[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Good. I don’t remember too much of how our government works but at least that is a good sign of it not becoming reality.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter