699,178 posts

The myth that only females can be harassed or raped needs to stop

Reddit View
July 13, 2019
138 upvotes

Guys get sexually harassed too

11,011 points831 commentssubmitted by taa2000217 to r/teenagers2

Guess what? Guys get sexually harassed too. Wanna know how I know that? Because I've been sexually harassed multiple times. I'm not gonna get into the details because I don't wanna talk about it, even on an alt and this post will get lost in new. Anyway, I'm tried of women being like, guys don't get sexually harassed, they don't have that fear. Guess what? I do, whenever I'm around these women, I get scared. No I don't get cat called often, but I have been, multiple times by women. So stop saying I have all this privledge, that I don't understand. I've been cat called, I've been sexually harassed. I have that fear that someone might rape me. I still see these women who sexually harassed me on a weekly basis. Never tell someone they don't understand just because of there gender or race.

EDIT: I made response post to this post instead of making a ton of edit subtitles.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ccqyym/a_response_to_guys_can_get_sexually_harrassed_too/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share


Post Information
Title The myth that only females can be harassed or raped needs to stop
Author CARV3RR
Upvotes 138
Comments 13
Date 13 July 2019 03:51 AM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/711461
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/cckvi6/the_myth_that_only_females_can_be_harassed_or/
Similar Posts
Comments

[–]LankyCar0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy

I mean isn’t this common sense? I have yet to hear a source that claims it only happens to females.

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

Spend time with feminists and you will.
But, I wouldn't wish such suffering on anyone ...

[–]LankyCar-1 points0 points  (7 children) | Copy

Lol I’ve been around plenty of feminists and never once heard them spew this bs. Seems like you built yourself a straw man.

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

Lol I’ve been around plenty of feminists

Why do you hang out with lesbians?

never once heard them spew this bs.

More on that below, but also ... educate yourself. Also, employ the principle of charity, rather than accusing me of straw-manning.

As to femists and rape - start by googling "Rape Culture", and read through it.
Read Susan Brownmiller's dishonest but seminal work Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape.
Rape, you see, is something men do to women, because misogyny. According to feminists, that is.

You might also look into exactly what cough National Order of Women cough organization somehow got the legal definition of "rape" narrowed so much that most of the sexual violence women commit against men is now termed "forced to penetrate" or "sexual assault" instead of rape. Voila, feminists win again by redefining their terms and "proving" their point. Why did they do that? Do you think maybe they had some agenda going, some reason to divert attention away from female sexual violence, so they could use rape (of women) as a political weapon against men?

That's what all this comes down to. Feminists need to deny sexual violence against men, by women, so they can play the victim. They don't mind so much about prison rape and are willing to admit it, but that's just man-on-man so they lump it in with toxic masculinity and pay no heed.

-==-

That you don't know the feminist dogma about rape, and how they use it to attack men, might indicate you have little contact with feminist theory. You probably know women who say they're feminist because they have no idea what that feminism actually is, and what feminism actually says/advocates/encourages. Unless you really have been somehow hanging out with man-hating lesbians - in which case you either tuned out what they said, or found the only batch that doesn't spout their nonsense endlessly.

[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Principle of charity

In philosophy and rhetoric, the principle of charity or charitable interpretation requires interpreting a speaker's statements in the most rational way possible and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation. In its narrowest sense, the goal of this methodological principle is to avoid attributing irrationality, logical fallacies, or falsehoods to the others' statements, when a coherent, rational interpretation of the statements is available.


[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28

[–]LankyCar0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

A loud minority will always be a loud minority, the bigger question is why you care so much? It’s not really affecting you, unless you let it. And considering your response which I bet you do a lot of research on isn’t much more than a waste of time. Why don’t you worry about something that matters, your crusade against women isn’t gonna change anyone’s mind and it definitely y isn’t gonna get rid of your insecurity, it’s kinda obvious. You can type up another response and cite another source but you are still typing on a computer completing nothing.

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

which I bet you do a lot of research on

Wrong.
I knew those things already.

the bigger question is why you care so much

Stick to the point at hand, bucko.
Psychologizing your interlocutor is a sure sign of dishonesty, unwillingness to admit being wrong, or a weak ego.

isn’t gonna get rid of your insecurity

Projection much?

-==-

Are you actually an SJW troll?

[–]LankyCar-1 points0 points  (2 children) | Copy

[–]User-31f64a4e0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

/r/IHaveToMakeAdHominemAttacks, is that the one for you?

[–]LankyCar-1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

lol



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter