~ archived since 2018 ~

Y'all are a bunch of chameleons

SirTopKekington

September 13, 2017

0 upvotes

/r/RedPillWomen

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Y'all are a bunch of chameleons
Author	SirTopKekington
Upvotes	0
Comments	21
Date	September 13, 2017 1:10 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/RedPillWomen
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/6zrd2o/yall_are_a_bunch_of_chameleons/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/yall-are-a-bunch-of-chameleons.73411 https://theredarchive.com/post/73411

Comments

[–]platewrecked8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]SirKolbath3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]platewrecked4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]SirKolbath2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]BewareTheOldMan2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Madam - what you're doing is "name-calling," a classic tactic when one is at a loss for a counter-argument/counter-point. I get these guys are being snarky and lightly sarcastic, but to dismiss them as angry or involuntary celibates only proves their point.

Over the last few decades male-female relationships have degenerated to the point where a significant decline, if NOT checked, is inevitable. The signs are ALL AROUND us. Fewer men getting married, fewer babies being born within stable marriage unions, 40% overall Out-of-Wedlock (OOW) birth-rate in the U.S., men REFUSING to subject themselves to a system that has a 50% failure-rate and places them at risk for LOSING at minimum half of their net worth, reduced influence/presence with their children (assuming he's a good/great father and does not have physical custody), financially supporting a woman AND her subsequent live-in lovers/boyfriends (either temporarily or lifetime basis), and likely paying attorney's fees for a wife who MOSTLY FAILED to uphold the marriage contract.

We admit that men are also subject to the aforementioned behaviors, but the fact remains that MOSTLY WOMEN are VOLUNTARILY destroying the institution of marriage almost singlehandedly by initiating almost 70+ of divorces nationwide due to.....DISSATISFACTION. NOT domestic violence, infidelity or some other DISQUALIFYING deficiency, but DISSATISFACTION. Due to No-Fault Divorce and disparaging views regarding men, some of the country's best males are opting out of societal expectations. Even when several commenters TRIED to explain some of the issues regarding marriage, they are being LARGELY dismissed. The feminists and Social Justice Warriors are drowning these guys out with "rape culture," increasing false accusations (violence, molestation, rape/date-rape, creepy men, man-children), it's understandable why men are hesitant to engage women on ANY basis.

Instead of engaging active, positive, and productive discussion you resort to name-calling and jest. Good men withdrawing from society, fatherhood, and adult-associated responsibilities is NOT good for women, children, or the elderly...but MOSTLY it hurts society. This has no effect on happily married women or happily single women, but the VAST MAJORITY of women seeking marriage are STRUGGLING to find the LAST GOOD MAN on EARTH. They are generally CONFUSED and frustrated why men refuse to play ball in accordance to THEIR wishes, terms, and expectations. Make fun if you wish, but WE ALL LOSE when society's BEST males refuse to participate in a rigged system" that places them at severe disadvantage.

You are in a privileged position which allows you to make corrections, but instead you have jokes.

There's more...there's ALWAYS more, but this is enough for now.

End Rant.

[–]CrazyHorseInvincibleModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]therealpkg 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cardiscappa2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]BubbleGas 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

original traditional family structures, which is what RPW is all about?

This is going to be a brutal redpill that many women don't want to accept, but here goes.

Before feminism and the sexual liberation, when we still had traditionalism, females didn't have rights. Wife beating was legal. Marital rape was legal because females were male property. Married women couldn't have property. Only men voted. However, at the cost of these things women became a protected class.

Women are biologically designed to be a protected class. They have greater risk of STIs, they have risk of pregnancy (and complications including death) and they have hymens for a reason (virginity is sacred).

Women and men played different, but complementary roles in society. The woman was taken care of (shelter and resources). And the man was taken care of (cooking, cleaning, sex).

Now women can do everything a man can. In fact they do even more because of preferential biases and diversity initiatives.

It's very easy for women to claim to want to revert back to traditionalism, but will you also accept marital rape? Will you accept wife beating? Will you accept not owning property? Will you give up the vote?

The tradcon life for a modern day women is the easiest lifestyle for a human. You are protected by the state (no marital rape, no beating). You can own whatever you want to own. You are born with your value (fertility). And if it all goes sour you can divorce rape the guy and take the kids.

Don't lie to yourself. The traditional family was all about sacrifices. Men sacrificed a lot. Women sacrificed a lot. Now men sacrifice even more and women sacrifice even less. How is that traditional again?

[–]Cardiscappa0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

when we still had traditionalism, females didn't have rights. Wife beating was legal. Marital rape was legal because females were male property. Married women couldn't have property. Only men voted.

Only property owners voted, so that left out a lot of men. Voting was for the upper class. What era are you referring to? 900BC or 1700AD's?

It's very easy for women to claim to want to revert back to traditionalism, but will you also accept marital rape? Will you accept wife beating? Will you accept not owning property? Will you give up the vote?

You need to define traditionalism. Are you talking beating women over the head with a club and dragging them back to your cave kind of traditional?

Don't lie to yourself. The traditional family was all about sacrifices. Men sacrificed a lot. Women sacrificed a lot. Now men sacrifice even more and women sacrifice even less. How is that traditional again?

Who's saying that women sacrificing even less, having their cake and eating it too, is traditional? I'm confused.

[–]BubbleGas 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Cardiscappa0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cardiscappa4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]SirKolbath2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Cardiscappa1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]therealpkg 1 points1 points1 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Atomicbebe1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link