Gamma Bias and The Highlighted Gender

Auserna · 2021-07-10T14:29:50+00:00

Gamma bias is a new psychological theory

A theory that currently exposes the:

Highlight Priviliage & Perpetration

In men while it

Erase Victimhood & Celebration

In men.

So we're never going to hear about this theory again and It'll get no deeper looking onto or get any exposure in the mainstream until it starts effecting women?

Ekas_Babbar · 2021-07-10T12:05:30+00:00

That’s a phenomenon used against men for a very long time

__pulsar · 2021-07-10T15:34:39+00:00

I wouldn't call it a "new" theory but it's definitely true. Anyone with half a brain can see that.

girraween · 2021-07-11T01:22:26+00:00

All from @thetinmen

Follow him on Insta, he’s amazing.

matrixislife · 2021-07-10T17:20:00+00:00

An obvious point, this type of highlighting/erasing can occur in any area where you want to promote one faction over another. Knowing how to spot this in action is a good way to find out the bias of the article you are reading, or the person you are talking to.

splitdipless · 2021-07-11T03:28:11+00:00

Except "man" in word suffixes usually has a Saxon origin, which in the English use is gender neutral. A woman can be a henchman or a gunman too. IF the Norman conquest didn't happen, it's possible that male gunmen exclusively would be called gunwermen and not gunmen.

Blutarg · 2021-07-12T00:57:51+00:00

Very interesting. Thank you, as always.

ZS_1171 · 2021-07-11T07:20:39+00:00

i see what you're going for and i like what you're doing so far. gun'MAN' is just the default, it doesnt necessarily mean men, it can be woman. but i see what you mean.

Title	Gamma Bias and The Highlighted Gender
Author	No-Perspective5346
Upvotes	268
Comments	9
Date	July 10, 2021 11:33 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ohh2o6/gamma_bias_and_the_highlighted_gender/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/gamma-bias-and-the-highlighted-gender.824537 https://theredarchive.com/post/824537

Comments