TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Woman who admitted to nine charges of sexual activity with a child was sentenced to only 32 months in jail.

FSOexpo

April 24, 2021
435 upvotes
/r/PussyPass
https://cumbriacrack.com/2021/04/09/penrith-woman-jailed-for-having-sex-with-14-year-old-schoolboy/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Woman who admitted to nine charges of sexual activity with a child was sentenced to only 32 months in jail.
Author

FSOexpo

Upvotes 435
Comments 26
Date April 24, 2021 11:23 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPass
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PussyPass/comments/mxvmxf/woman_who_admitted_to_nine_charges_of_sexual/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPass/woman-who-admitted-to-nine-charges-of-sexual.830019
https://theredarchive.com/post/830019
Top posts by FSOexpo

Ashley Thomas, who was found guilty of aggravated child neglect, facilitation of sexual exploitation of a minor, sexual exploitation of a minor, criminal responsibility for rape of a child and continual sexual abuse was sentenced to 40 years in prison.

7240 upvotes
August 15, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

District attorney requests woman who had sex with a minor be punished the same as a man would: “We felt strongly that the defendant shouldn’t be treated any differently just because she is female, and would only accept a felony plea”

6388 upvotes
August 25, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Felicia Mulkey, 33, pleaded guilty to one count of Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child, one count of Super Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child, and two counts of Possession of Child Pornography, and received two life sentences with no chance of parole.

3568 upvotes
December 13, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

woman, 37, was charged with 17 counts of criminal sexual conduct with a minor second degree and 202 counts of disseminating harmful material to a minor.

3465 upvotes
June 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Woman was sentenced twice: 25 years, then 35 years for: rape, sexual exploitation of children and possessing child pornography. Prosecutor: “We didn’t think the federal sentence was enough…She needed to be held accountable for the rape of her child".

3087 upvotes
September 25, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Woman who was previously fired as a correctional officer for “unprofessional conduct and inappropriate relations” with a juvenile offender was found guilty of "Continuous sexual abuse of a child", and was sentenced to 25 years in prison without parole. The victim was an 11 year old boy.

3025 upvotes
November 9, 2021
/r/PussyPassDenied

Former elementary school teacher, 42, who was found guilty on two counts of child molesting and one count of inappropriate communication with a minor, received a 47-year sentence for molesting a 10 year old boy.

2721 upvotes
January 6, 2022
/r/PussyPassDenied

Former female teacher who groomed and sexually exploited a student and then blamed it on the victim was sentenced to 19 years in federal prison. Female victim: "You are a manipulator and a predator...I always thought predators were scary men. I never would have thought it would be my own teacher"

2502 upvotes
March 13, 2023
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[–]orderabi 82 points83 points84 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

sexual activity

you mean rape?

[–]MetroidofHyrule 57 points58 points59 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Just say she raped him

[–]CazRaX 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

They can't because in the UK a woman literally CANNOT rape someone. The legal definition specifically says;

(1)A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a)HE intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with HIS PENIS;

(b)B does not consent to the penetration, and

(c)A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

By their laws only a man can rape so the news outlets can't say she raped a child or they can be sued.

[–]yaboi869 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Which is bullshit

[–]kaczan3 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes. Women claim that only men rape, and when you point to them that this is nto true, they fight to change the laws to this bs definition and then point to it in triumph. It's like when they point to the dictionary definition of feminism.

[+]Catnip4Pedos1 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think women were behind this. The law is from the 1950s

[–]kaczan3 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look it up. Women are behind it, and year doesn'y matter. In 1910s they demanded more men are sent to war and no women, even though a bit earlier they run their mouths about how they are equal to men. Women always done horrific shit.

[–]Soda_BoBomb 43 points44 points45 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Awwww the poor woman had just gotten out of an abusive relationship. So sad. Totally understandable why she would then turn around and abuse a teenager.

/s for those who need it.

[–]banjonyc 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Rape a teenager

[–]Soda_BoBomb 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape is abuse yes

Edit I said abuse specifically for the wording comparison to point out how stupid it is.

[–]Kimchi_Cowboy 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women: "Ahhh he liked it!!!!"
Males: "Its rape"
Justice System: "Blah Blah Blah, Patriarchy"

[–]Historical_Date_1314 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If this had been a man, he’d been handed 32 years probably.

[–]kaczan3 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She has a pink mask. Don't forget to be a TRENDY rapist! Tee-hee.

[–]just_some_dude_blah 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

crazy how this just evades the mainstream media. Almost as if feminists control it and their agenda is to encourage female supremacy and not actually equality.

[+]warpig1997 -19 points-18 points-17 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm not supporting her in any way. What she did is completely wrong but 32 months is a good amount of time to make a person think about their fucked up choices. If she changes or not is a different question, but 32 months is long you know.

[–]sassy_lil_sasquatch 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So you'd be happy if a man got 32 months for the same crime? Rather than the many years they would get?

[–]warpig1997 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

no I meant that prison time should be more about fixing the person mentally more than fixating on punishing the person regardless of gender. Idk man this sounds right in my head I could be wrong

[–]sassy_lil_sasquatch 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I can get that. I just don't see why 32 months is more than enough for a women but not even nearly enough for a man. At least, I don't understand how society had that way of thinking

[–]toto29620 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's usefull for the victim to feel understood and not devalorised with a super short jail time or no time at all. It's a process to revcover from that type of agression and feeling acknowleged with à punishment for the agressor is a part of it.

[–]DirtNapsRevenge -5 points-4 points-3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

While I'm on board with the motive of the post, I really wish people would stop using the word "child" when describing incidents like this. A 14 years old is NOT a child by any definition. They're a teenager by definition and very few if any haven't already developed secondary sexual characteristics so while there are plenty of legal and moral implications of an adult abusing their position in this manner and they deserve to be held accountable;

Engaging in sexual activity with a teenager is NOT Pedophilia which is what having sex with a child is.

People need to be made aware that there are advocates for legalizing Pedophilia who have for years been deliberately attempting to mislead people by calling this sort of conduct Pedophilia as way to normalize their abhorrent agenda in the public's eye.

Keep posting the examples of the hypocrisy in the law but be mindful of the words you use when describing it so as not to inadvertently give an assist to the sickest creeps in existence.

[–]Buzz_Killington_III 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

A 14 years old is NOT a child by any definition.

They are by the dictionary.

a person between birth and puberty or full growth...

And even Merriam-Webster

a person not yet of the age of majority...

Let's try Cambridge.

a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult, or a son or daughter of any age...

Really, everywhere.

[–]despairguardian 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Kind of outed themselves huh?

[–]DirtNapsRevenge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, you're a special kinda of stupid aren't you.

[–]DirtNapsRevenge -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you really that dumb or did you just not read what you wrote?

" a person between birth and PUBERTY or full growth"

Did your mommy and daddy not explain to to what puberty is and when it usually begins and ends? Biologically speaking a teenager IS a fully grown human being with all the functioning parts of one, including the ones needed to reproduce. ...

"a person not yet of the age of majority..."

Age of majority is a legal term describing a person's standing in the view of the law, one that varies from country to country, culture to culture with some not even recognize the concept. It is NOT synonymous with adult.

Take a look at this list and TRY to comprehend that in many countries, a 14 year old is at or even beyond the legal age to give consent for sex:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_age_of_consent

"a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult, or a son or daughter of any age..."

Not only did you parents not give you the birds and bees talk apparently wherever you got your "education" neglected to explain the difference between a noun and an adjective. Yes, my sons and daughters are each my CHILD even though they're in the twenties and thirties ... it has no bearing on this discussion.

[–]Buzz_Killington_III 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Let me dumb this down for you. You wrote:

A 14 years old is NOT a child by any definition

I responded with many definitions like:

a person between birth and puberty or full growth...

That alone negates your statement and proves that, in fact, there is a definition in which a 14-year old is a child. As a matter of fact, you actually have to ignore almost all of other definitions to find one where a 14-year old is NOT a child.

Age of majority is a legal term describing a person's standing in the view of the law

Yes, which is the legal definition of a child. Again nullifying your statement that "A 14 years old is NOT a child by any definition."

wherever you got your "education" neglected to explain the difference between a noun and an adjective.

Um, I don't think you know what those words mean. Anyway, you (unsurprisingly) failed to notice the relevant part of the sentence:

a boy or girl from the time of birth until he or she is an adult....

Let's look up the definition of an adult, you know, for fun:

  • a person who is fully grown or developed or of age.
  • a full-grown animal or plant.
  • a person who has attained the age of maturity as specified by law.

None of those definitions fit a 14-year old in most of the world.

I really don't think I can make this any more clear. You obviously see what you want to see. My question is why you're so desperate to see it that way.

EDIT: Oh, and age of consent is irrelevant and unrelated to the discussion. You made a claim, I thoroughly proved it false. The end.

[–]DirtNapsRevenge 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You've proven nothing but the fact you struggle with the complexities of the English language, basic biology and legal issues.

Let me REALLY dumb it down for you.

Words can have more than one meaning, for instance John is 38 years old and his MY/YOUR CHILD, but he is not A CHILD ... context matters.

Mixing legal and commonly used biological terms doesn't help ... a person who has not attained the age of majority is NOT legally called a child, though many people misuse the term they are actually called a MINOR. Your source's definition is simply wrong.

Which is the point I made originally, many people commonly misuse words to describe these situations as you and the OP have done.

As for your assertion that age of consent is irrelevant you are so utterly wrong it's hard to believe as it is the one and ONLY issue here.

The story posted here is NOT about an adult having sexual contact with a child as the use of the world child in the subject suggests. Adult/child sex is properly called Pedophilia the defining characteristic of which the victim is Prepubescent, meaning they lack secondary sexual characteristics.

This IS a story about a victim who by virtue of the combination of his age and the country he lives in is unable to give consent to sexual activity ... that's called Statutory Rape ... in England. If the same exact event described in this story transpired in China, Italy, Austria, Japan, Argentina, Chile, Portugal, Peru, Puerto Rico, Hungary etc etc there is no story because the law in those countries doesn't classify it as a crime.

By referring to the victim as a child, which the story doesn't do rather only the poster of it does, you are conflating the issue of Pedophilia with the issue of Statutory Rape which the advocates for legalizing Pedophilia desperately hope the public continues to do as it servers their sick agenda.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter