Like perhaps suing the government for allowing harassment law to be tried by courts. Harassment law essentially protects women against the desires of men and can be interpreted in any way possible, i.e. "he looked at me wrong!" As such I believe it is an unconstitutional law and is only set up to protect princess. If women feel bothered by men who want them they should have no recourse to sue organizations at all. If females cannot handle that their primal biology attracts men that want to mate that should not be the basis of any law whatsoever. I'm sorry but the argument that harassment is a tort or an offense that prevents a female employee from doing her job is idiotic, females gain their positions via sex appeal. Sex appeal is intrinsic to the female, especially the young female, and giving them the ammo of harassment law puts the government squarely in as an intermediary between flirting. We can see the affect this has had on the birth rate in Western Nations. Harassment law should be repealed in the US and Canada. If women don't like their treatment at work, so long as they aren't assaulted, they should buck up and deal with it and leave it as an internal matter with the company.

Women love harassment law because it affords them a twofold benefit. First they can go into companies secure in the knowledge that low status males cannot present themselves to them without punishment. Secondly if they feel the need to punish the male they not only send a message to other males regarding the dangers of pursuing dream girls, they also profit handsomely in the form of lawsuits against the company. Female access to harassment law must be squashed completely and they must be subject to the natural pressures of the sexual realm again particularly when money is at stake in terms of the paycheck.

Women don't seem to understand that men create businesses in order to attract women in the first place, they don't do it merely for survival or to have a pretty wardrobe, which appears to be a major reason why women go into work. The existence of harassment law creates a wedge between this reproductive instinct and lowers the value of the money the male may receive from the business since it cannot be used to translate into sex with female employees anymore. I bet without harassment law most women would turn back to family formation, since the working world will be free to express their real desires with these females and shunt off the females who dare attempt to collect money without providing sex. With these laws in place, however, these women are able to collect money from jobs they shouldn't have and enjoy shielding from aggressive males who are capable enough to contribute to the society but are punished for seeking the rewards! Women must pay their sex tax again if they want to work the more lucrative fields dominated by men or else the playing field is completely unfair.

Suing the gov for not providing normal females in the West might wake people up to the scope of the problem. I think the heart of hypergamy starts and ends with the government since women are mostly law abiding and often look to government "rights" to give them bennies and the ability to rake unattractive men over the coals in the courts. Family formation with attractive women is the foundation of nearly all male endeavors and the nonsense pumped out by the government has shielded women from the affections from average men that could save these women from spinsterhood and oblivion. The average citizen male does everything to get normal females for sex 'n babes and this has been thwarted by strange policies by the government. Suing the government for unconstitutional laws, such as harassment law which are circumstantial and can be interpreted in a million different ways, should be a centerpiece of men's rights.