Here's the article.
http://archive.is/IUzSt#selection-1069.298-1069.341
The men are actually treated worse than the women. Two men's finals were scheduled so men are affected twice as much, but more to the point; the women's final will be played first.
About 30 years ago in Chicago, the city where March Madness was born (the phrase not necessarily the concept), people noticed that the stands were nearly empty for the girl's games and were at capacity for the boys. What they did was schedule the girls games right before the boys to boost attendance for the girls games.
It would not surprise me at all if this were the case. They might just see it as "bad form" to remind people that the women's game is just not that popular compared to the men's game. It makes sense. If they may eventually have to give women the same prize money and "conditions" as the men, they might want women to actually deserve it by generating the same revenue as the men. That won't happen unless the women's game becomes as popular as the men's.
[–]valenin 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]andejoh[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]McFeely_Smackup1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
I saw this on the news earlier
The complete immersion in victim fetish is just stunning. The entire reason were having this conversation is the women AND MEN'S games are grouped together. They literally are "doing it to the men".
[–]DJ-Roukan 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mitchell78 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pz5 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]litfur 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link