LOL at believing the story an amoral budget airline like EasyJet sold you. "be an issue" - if she actually did anything other than debate the probably-religious-nutcases that voiced the initial complaints they'd make that statement more concrete.
Now they just chose to appease some customers over the other. That's what it sounds like to me. Shades of United Airlines a while ago in terms of framing customers.
You're making a false analogy between nakedness and see through shirts. The layer of fabric makes the difference. If you dont wanna deal with it that sounds like a you problem to me
Yes, it is. You can't objectively rationalize why it isn't. Conforming without question to some irrational social norms is why our society is going to shit.
First off, I’ve seen many a guy in the airport/on an airplane with a mesh sports jersey, saw some nip too! And nobody cared. Second, sexual assault is unwanted sexual contact. most of the women I know have experienced it at least once, have a little empathy. You’re making ridiculous and insulting statements here, but you knew that already. Sorry someone hurt you. Several men and two women have sexually assaulted me, wouldn’t wish that on you even with your wackado views on women. one was my cousin and it was over the course of two years when I was 5th to 6th grade, you want to know what the police said? “Oh well this here is a he-said-she-said matter, they are all underage (he was 17 and 9 months) so we can’t do anything.” The system is broken it doesn’t help anyone but the rich.
Women wearing what they feel comfortable in is not hurting anyone.
I dont think that the problem here as many say is or should be her see-through top, and I know this is going to be a little off topic, but bear with me. Lets imagine that that woman is transgender for a moment and that she went from male to female by treatments, clinical operations... etc. Now she looks as much femenine as a woman can, but isnt her nipples truly the nipples of a biologically born male? In our society there is no problem with men showing their nipples, and to my concern the structure of a nipple at least from a looking standpoint is the same for men as it is for women, only that women naturally can develop breasts. So why the distintion? Now, about the alleged disruptive behavior, thats a whole different thing, although they dont specify whats so disruptive about her but idk
Imagine how pathetic you are as a person if you complain about someone in a see-through top. To which you'll probably reply, stop white knighting because men wouldn't be allowed to wear a see through pants either (although perhaps the analogy would be a shirt which would be perfectly allowed, but let's go with pants). Then you're fighting a double standard by imposing the wrong on the side that still has some liberty.
We should be fighting for people to dress however they want on a plane as long as there's a layer between skin and air and it doesn't incite violence, yet we choose to attack the woman because "we wouldn't be allowed to do it either". That's a logical failure this sub keeps making peroodically.
People need to stop getting so offended by everything. How you gonna get so mad you vocalize your complaints publically at someones nipple being visible under their clothing? It's just pathetic in my opinion. Live and let live. Who is she hurting by wearing that? Allah? We don't even know whether that corporate story by EasyJet holds. I'd wager it was either some stuck up frustrated old person in business class and/or some moral high horse religious family complaining about it and the crew choosing to appease them over the girl.
Why not? Why can you not wear that in an airplane? That's just an irrational conservative attitude talking. I'm all for rational arguments why it wouldn't be okay but I can't think of any..
Maybe because primary reproductive organs are to a much larger extent dangerous (in terms of rape) and/or unhygienic to expose, both for the owner and for surrounding people?
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 48 points49 points50 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 38 points39 points40 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]vxd386 84 points85 points86 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 16 points17 points18 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditiz4pussies 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The-True-Kehlder 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
LOL at believing the story an amoral budget airline like EasyJet sold you. "be an issue" - if she actually did anything other than debate the probably-religious-nutcases that voiced the initial complaints they'd make that statement more concrete.
Now they just chose to appease some customers over the other. That's what it sounds like to me. Shades of United Airlines a while ago in terms of framing customers.
[–]oddball3139 11 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]threehugging1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
You're making a false analogy between nakedness and see through shirts. The layer of fabric makes the difference. If you dont wanna deal with it that sounds like a you problem to me
[–]oddball3139 11 points12 points13 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes, it is. You can't objectively rationalize why it isn't. Conforming without question to some irrational social norms is why our society is going to shit.
[–]oddball3139 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lesbefriendly 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MouthSpiders 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ClapBackRat 63 points64 points65 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CuntSniffer9001 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Osmiac 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]banelicious 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WolfMafiaArise 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]WolfMafiaArise 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kaz22475 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs 7 points8 points9 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gabwinone 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]EatingQrow -9 points-8 points-7 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs 1 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brawl_Noob 8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]EatingQrow 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs 0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]EatingQrow 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditiz4pussies 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bubblegrubs -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xd-Retardia 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]hugtreesnaked1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
She had a shirt on. A man wouldn’t be kicked off for wearing a translucent shirt.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]gabwinone 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hugtreesnaked1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
First off, I’ve seen many a guy in the airport/on an airplane with a mesh sports jersey, saw some nip too! And nobody cared. Second, sexual assault is unwanted sexual contact. most of the women I know have experienced it at least once, have a little empathy. You’re making ridiculous and insulting statements here, but you knew that already. Sorry someone hurt you. Several men and two women have sexually assaulted me, wouldn’t wish that on you even with your wackado views on women. one was my cousin and it was over the course of two years when I was 5th to 6th grade, you want to know what the police said? “Oh well this here is a he-said-she-said matter, they are all underage (he was 17 and 9 months) so we can’t do anything.” The system is broken it doesn’t help anyone but the rich.
Women wearing what they feel comfortable in is not hurting anyone.
[–]gabwinone 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yaagle1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I dont think that the problem here as many say is or should be her see-through top, and I know this is going to be a little off topic, but bear with me. Lets imagine that that woman is transgender for a moment and that she went from male to female by treatments, clinical operations... etc. Now she looks as much femenine as a woman can, but isnt her nipples truly the nipples of a biologically born male? In our society there is no problem with men showing their nipples, and to my concern the structure of a nipple at least from a looking standpoint is the same for men as it is for women, only that women naturally can develop breasts. So why the distintion? Now, about the alleged disruptive behavior, thats a whole different thing, although they dont specify whats so disruptive about her but idk
[–]nate_hoodsie[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gabwinone 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PeterFalksEye 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Defendprivacy 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (16 children) | Copy Link
Imagine how pathetic you are as a person if you complain about someone in a see-through top. To which you'll probably reply, stop white knighting because men wouldn't be allowed to wear a see through pants either (although perhaps the analogy would be a shirt which would be perfectly allowed, but let's go with pants). Then you're fighting a double standard by imposing the wrong on the side that still has some liberty.
We should be fighting for people to dress however they want on a plane as long as there's a layer between skin and air and it doesn't incite violence, yet we choose to attack the woman because "we wouldn't be allowed to do it either". That's a logical failure this sub keeps making peroodically.
People need to stop getting so offended by everything. How you gonna get so mad you vocalize your complaints publically at someones nipple being visible under their clothing? It's just pathetic in my opinion. Live and let live. Who is she hurting by wearing that? Allah? We don't even know whether that corporate story by EasyJet holds. I'd wager it was either some stuck up frustrated old person in business class and/or some moral high horse religious family complaining about it and the crew choosing to appease them over the girl.
[–]AskMeAboutMyPronoun1 points [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
There are times and places for a see-through top. A plane isn’t one of them.
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
Why not? Why can you not wear that in an airplane? That's just an irrational conservative attitude talking. I'm all for rational arguments why it wouldn't be okay but I can't think of any..
[–]ericader 11 points12 points13 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]glitterbiscuitsx -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]gabwinone 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]glitterbiscuitsx -2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gabwinone 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redditiz4pussies 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
WoNt SoMeBoDy THiNk Of ThE ChIlDrEn
You're the one sexualizing a nipple my friend. There's a huge dufference with primary sexual organs
[–]oddball3139 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Maybe because primary reproductive organs are to a much larger extent dangerous (in terms of rape) and/or unhygienic to expose, both for the owner and for surrounding people?
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]threehugging -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iconoficons -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link