Disturbing: NY Court of Appeals OKs Hearsay as 'Substantial Evidence' in College Tribunal's Sex Assault Hearing

JamesIsWaffle · 2018-12-03T04:29:14+00:00

How Is this not illegal, like she didn’t ask him for consent either so she raped him as well? How the fuck does this work

Hadashi_blacksky · 2018-12-03T10:11:30+00:00

"I heard he was a WITCH!"

That kind of hear say?

bufedad · 2018-12-03T14:51:12+00:00

This will be appealed, and it will be overturned.

It has already been determined that you have a right to face your accuser.

andejoh · 2018-12-03T21:28:09+00:00

The decision was wrong IMO, but I don't believe that it is hearsay. Hearsay is when you hear something through a third party. Unless the police officer wasn't the person who interviewed her, it's not hearsay. It's first person, she told me. It's hearsay if it's she told my colleague. He still didn't have the opportunity to face his accuser. There's a reason why police don't pursue charges when a complainant doesn't want to pursue charges. He has no ability to compare her testimony to the detectives.

Title	Disturbing: NY Court of Appeals OKs Hearsay as 'Substantial Evidence' in College Tribunal's Sex Assault Hearing
Author	Title_IX_For_All
Upvotes	16
Comments	4
Date	December 3, 2018 4:07 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/a2kyy6/disturbing_ny_court_of_appeals_oks_hearsay_as/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/disturbing-ny-court-of-appeals-oks-hearsay-as.889008 https://theredarchive.com/post/889008

Comments