Rule 3: Always give the puck to a little girl, you monster

Last season, there was a situation involving the Capitals' Brett Connolly in which he tapped the glass with his stick toward where a little blonde girl named Keelan Moxley was standing.

He tossed a puck over the glass, an adult grabbed it ... and handed it to a little boy next to her. He did it again, tossed the puck, an adult grabbed it ... and handed it to another little boy next to her. So Connolly did it a third time, and finally this puck was Plinko'd down to Keelan. This was rude, sexist and, worst of all from an NHL perspective, demographically disadvantageous. You were very close to making Keelan Moxley a new NBA fan, sir. That said ...

were very close to making Keelan Moxley a new NBA fan, sir. That said ...

Rule 3a: Or maybe prey on the good nature of NHL players

As one of my favorite hockey cynics Alan May of NBC Sports Washington noted at the time, "That father orchestrated that, because only the cute little girl was going to get it and he made sure all three of his kids got a puck." A risky scheme to be sure, and one that undoubtedly runs the risk of public shaming, but hard to argue with the results. I mean, Keelan Moxley went on to attend playoff games, including a Cup Final game, and meet players. Diabolical. (Side note: This wasn't actually her dad, but I'm still calling this theorem tested and approved.)

So basically its sexist if you DON'T give the puck to a little girl but its not sexist if only a little girl gets a puck?

IDK how women who like hockey could see a guy giving a little boy a puck (instead of a girl) and boycott the sport for that....

Just seems weird and it was a big story

whole article is here