New puritanism at work in refusals to show film The Red Pill

HeForeverBleeds · 2017-04-18T22:35:19+00:00

Parroting the dogma of feminist academics who admit they haven’t seen The Red Pill, the USU board justified its decision by arguing the film promotes “sexual violence”.

This is very telling, and makes it blatantly obvious that feminists as a whole give zero shits about the discrimination that males face, no matter how much some might say that feminism helps men, too, when they preemptively label anything addressing male's issues as misogyny and promoting violence

Of course none of them have actually seen the film. They have to turn a blind eye to the evidence and examples of the myriad of areas where males are discriminated against, because recognizing the reality of it dismantles their whole foundation that is based on the notion of male privilege

2017-04-18T23:04:12+00:00

if anything it is against sexual violence since it is condemning MGM, FGM and spousal abuse of any kind.

TibsKirk · 2017-04-18T22:50:27+00:00

Anyone know why they turned on Germaine Greer? Let me guess: It had nothing to do with her book The Beautiful Boy, which borders on pedo or is outright pedo. That's probably OK for them. But, if she said a man cannot be a woman, then she got crucified.

Does my guess come close to reality?

Ugh... while reading I clicked back here to comment, and now the article is behind a pay wall. Can somebody archive it please?

thrway_1000 · 2017-04-19T18:11:39+00:00

https://archive.is/VMbUM

Title	New puritanism at work in refusals to show film The Red Pill
Author	PeterWrightMGTOW
Upvotes	7
Comments	5
Date	April 18, 2017 9:54 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/66602n/new_puritanism_at_work_in_refusals_to_show_film/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/new-puritanism-at-work-in-refusals-to-show-film.925336 https://theredarchive.com/post/925336

Comments