TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

A New Zealand judge has dismissed charges against a man who posted semi-naked pictures of his wife on Facebook. The judge decided there wasn't enough evidence to prove she had suffered harm and the case was dismissed.

Aidernz

January 31, 2017
29 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2017/01/dismissal-for-man-who-put-semi-nude-pics-of-ex-online.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A New Zealand judge has dismissed charges against a man who posted semi-naked pictures of his wife on Facebook. The judge decided there wasn't enough evidence to prove she had suffered harm and the case was dismissed.
Author

Aidernz

Upvotes 29
Comments 12
Date January 31, 2017 12:36 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5r7xg3/a_new_zealand_judge_has_dismissed_charges_against/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-new-zealand-judge-has-dismissed-charges-against.932943
https://theredarchive.com/post/932943

Comments

[–]mwobuddy 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a win for men. If women aren't getting jailed for it, neither should men.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Come on, this is a court room and not a court of public opinion.

You HAVE to show damages in some capacity other than just hurt feelings. If you didn't even take a day off of work, and there's no indication of reduced performance, or impacted social relationships, what can the judge do? If he rules solely on your feelings, then every last person filing one of these claims is going to be "distraught, upset, and suicidal" in short order.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unless it has caused mental trauma somehow her fucking feelings should have no influence on the case. At most, this is a privacy violation and the guy has posted these photographs of her without her permission. It's utterly ridiculous that a woman can now literally start a court case purely on the basis of hurt feelings, for fuck's sake.

[–]MazeMouse 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't know if there is any legal basis for it in New Zealand but the worst things I could think of is "invasion of privacy" or something like that.
Other than that, she has to prove any damage she has suffered and while that MAY be psychological damage you will need a psychologist to prove that is the case.

As always, no proof beyond "she said" is no proof.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly, there are many shrinks who are payable for this who themselves have a feminist chip on their shoulder and are likely to see the world through that bias. There's also shrinks that don't, thankfully, buuuuuut they may be a minority especially when it comes to female ones.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

About time. We've gone from a 'presumption of innocence' to a 'presumption of suffering' when it comes to legal cases.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I didn't read the article but..

"The judge has said the police didn't prove serious emotional stress of harm

holy shit, so emotional stress is something that's illegal if can be proven?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Welcome to a world where NPD, HPD and ASPD rule the roost!

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess its a shoot out of who cries foul first.

[–]Blarneystone2 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean it is still a shitty thing to do. I understand the judges stance and honestly as long as it showed nothing more than what a bikini would show it is a push. However I do think he should be removed from facebook by facebook and all his friends should disassociate with him

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The judge has said the police didn't prove serious emotional stress of harm and it's going to be difficult to prove that on a case by case basis."

That to me sounds like the judge believes the law is unwieldy and using this case to make that point.

The judge said more detailed and specific evidence from the defendant as to her reaction and feelings to the photos were needed.

So in future people trying to make a complaint under this law will rant extensively on youtube or their blogs about how hurt their feelings are.

[–]rg57 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A case actually dismissed because nobody suffered harm?

Wow. There's sanity in the world, after all.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter