If our ancestors would have been infected by feminism, most likely we wouldn't have been born at all

2016-09-03T01:13:38+00:00

Wow! They had 14 people in thier study?

girlwriteswhat · 2016-09-03T13:58:08+00:00

Isn't it interesting how they seem to feel that, out of all the species on the planet, only humans could not possibly have a biological drive toward replicating their genes? It's the most amazing thing, when you think about it.

Every other species, from paramecia to mountain gorillas, have an innate impulse toward replicating themselves, and are provided with a set of basic biological wetware to assist them in this--everything from a sex drive and the pleasant sensations involved in sex, to the suckling/rooting reflex of newborns, to the bonding hormones released during sex and breastfeeding, to the mood-boosting chemicals in semen, which show up in women's bloodstreams within 45 minutes of them having unprotected sex, to the hormonal changes in human males that occur upon discovering their female partner is pregnant.

Yet to these feminists, women's natural desire to have children (which can certainly vary in individuals, as well as vary in terms of timing) is merely a collusion between the social constructs of heterosexism and patriarchy.

That women who are masculinized (likely by hormonal influences in the womb) might be more likely to lack this natural desire or its biological facilitators than hormonally typical women, that could never be a product of biology, either. It's all "patriarchy"...

How on earth can ANYONE take this stuff seriously?

feedmecarrots · 2016-09-03T06:13:39+00:00

What kind of sick mind writes in that manner? To answer the question posed in the title, it takes a lot of wealth to support feminism. I couldn't happen until the twentieth century.

BDMR_lurker · 2016-09-02T23:40:59+00:00

Female-bodied people? Pregnant people?

Seesh, these ill-brained people use 'people' like the Soviets used 'comrade' in '80s movies.

Except for 'lesbians', which should probably be expended into 'female-bodied, masculine-behavioured, homosexed people'.

lazydonovan · 2016-09-02T23:20:57+00:00

If that had happened, we'd have spared the universe of Feminism. I think we can call it a wash.

AtemAndrew · 2016-09-03T12:36:44+00:00

Well, yes, 'female-bodied people' AKA biological females are, biologically, the only gender capable of reproduction by way of having the child, as opposed to the biological male's capability of impregnanting said woman. That's generally how it works.

MRA-automatron-2kb · 2016-09-03T18:20:12+00:00

When women badger men to settle down and have a baby

and it's still the fault of the patriarchy.

2016-09-04T21:36:14+00:00

That was a nice buzzword salad. Didn't taste very good though

Title	If our ancestors would have been infected by feminism, most likely we wouldn't have been born at all
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	18
Comments	11
Date	September 2, 2016 10:57 PM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/50w0qp/if_our_ancestors_would_have_been_infected_by/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/if-our-ancestors-would-have-been-infected-by.942378 https://theredarchive.com/post/942378

Comments