TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Lacy Green, Lena Dunham, Jane Fonda and dozens of 'progressive' celebrities vow to oppose Donald Trump

Sasha_

July 26, 2016
0 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/289266-dozens-of-celebrities-pledge-to-campaign-against-trump
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Lacy Green, Lena Dunham, Jane Fonda and dozens of 'progressive' celebrities vow to oppose Donald Trump
Author

Sasha_

Upvotes 0
Comments 19
Date July 26, 2016 11:34 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4urnuh/lacy_green_lena_dunham_jane_fonda_and_dozens_of/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/lacy-green-lena-dunham-jane-fonda-and-dozens-of.944886
https://theredarchive.com/post/944886
Top posts by Sasha_

Billboard sign in Manchester UK

3791 upvotes
January 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

Second billboard sign in Manchester UK

3265 upvotes
January 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

WHO says "It's time to check in on men's health" for International Men's Day 2018

2612 upvotes
November 21, 2018
/r/MensRights

Australian feminist Clementine “Kill All Men” Ford doxes 14 year old boy who told her online to “put a shotgun in your [own] mouth”.

2286 upvotes
May 12, 2020
/r/MensRights

How a father lives after getting divorce raped.

852 upvotes
May 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

UK Police Officer: "Now I look back I recall an incident where a man was fatally stabbed by his girlfriend - and I had not recognised this as a domestic crime. I hate to think how we probably arrested some men who were actually the victim because we didn't believe them..."

738 upvotes
September 26, 2013
/r/MensRights

Sceptics conference tells misandrist feminists not to bother them with complaints about an all-male panel: 'look, we tried OK?' (image)

685 upvotes
September 23, 2013
/r/MensRights

Feminist charity demands UK Govt. statistics authority change its methodology because it 'suggests men and women are equally affected by domestic violence."

622 upvotes
March 7, 2014
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]ThePigmanAgain 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Progressive" is just the Hollywood code word for neo-liberal and neo-conservative scum who hide their evil behind political correctness.

“I genuinely believe that if Trump wins and gets the nuclear codes there is an excellent possibility it will lead to the end of civilization,” Schwartz added."

And then he put on his tin-foil hat and ran screaming down the road. This is how insane the pro-establishment people are, they are claiming that a Trump presidency will be pretty much the end of the world as they know it.

Vote Trump -- The Hamster On His Head Needs The Attention.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't news everyone who knew these people knew they were going to oppose him.

[–]Ultramegasaurus 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Better support a corrupt war criminal

[–]AVAtistar 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lacy Green is not a celebrity.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh that's just fucking depressing, for those who don't know, the guy in the centre starred as Barney Stinson in How I met your mother. It's just so fucking sad seeing this happen. The only thing that could make this worse is if someone like Nathan Fillion or the guy who plays Sheldon Cooper in the big bang theory suddenly decided to hop on the douche wagon instead of just giving their opinion and not signing up to this hard left bollocks.

The only good thing about this is the more these types of celebrities come out and public figures start actively campaigning against trump and being total cunts about it the more it's going to have the exact opposite effect. We had exactly this same situation with the EU referendum where it was all these fuckers coming along and telling leave supporters what horrible people they are and every one of them was part of the establishment.

I don't use the term 'white knight' very often but this one finally managed to tick me off, these people aren't the white knights they think they are, they're just a bunch of out of touch scumbags trying to insult everybody else into voting a different way.

For those who want to know what this is the equivalent of, I'll post an example.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQs8E0juBUs

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/1/590x/Bob-Geldof-680759.jpg

I'm very much being reminded of this when I see the American elections, it feels more like the establishment vs the people whenever you see the debates and what these twats have to say about Donald Trump. The most ridiculous part is the way they attack his supporters, using pretty much the exact same tactics they used over here where they'd call everyone racists, claim they're all white, blah blah blah, you get the picture.

[–]AlwaysABride 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

the guy in the centre starred as Barney Stinson in How I met your mother.

Ummm.... that's Doogie Howser.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry yes, didn't know his name properly :P

[–]civilsaint 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whatever. Trump will shit on men's rights just as quick as Hillary if it will win them a vote.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Question; why list three women, when names like Neil Patrick Harris and Bryan Cranston are also among said celebrities? The article even notes that former Trump ghostwriter Tony Schwartz has joined the protest movement. That makes your title seem a bit clickbaity.

Next question; how is opposing Donald Trump a men's rights issue?

[–]Lethn 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Regardless of how you feel about Donald Trump, with absolute certainty a vote for Hilary Clinton is a vote against Men's Rights. As a demographic, I would rather be ignored completely by the government than deliberately targeted.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Absolute? You're pretty sure of yourself.

But what about all the other damage that Trump will do to the United States? International relations, tax law, banking, military, general civil liberty, LGBT discrimination and protection, immigration, education, police and local emergency services? Do you know what his effect will be on that? What about the Supreme Court? Can you imagine what kind of chaos could result from Trump appointing a judge to the SCotUS from his own pocket?

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I highly doubt that Trump could do anything worse than Hilary "Oops I've deleted my emails containing classified information on an insecure server" Clinton, if she's like that with classified intel what is she going to be like with everything else?

Also, I can actually list specifics about why I think Hilary Clinton would be a monumental fuck up, can you do the same to Donald Trump? There are quite a few reasons why he'd do shitty things if he gets into power that I know of, but I want you to specifically explain why his policies would lead to the disaster you're claiming.

Why? Because whenever I see people attacking Trump, mainly on the left, just like with how the attack anybody else they disagree with they never go into actual specifics. Like with your claims about LGBT discrimination, do you have any actual evidence of policy or his attitude towards them that indicates he'd behave in such a way towards gays?

Also, if the American system is still any good, there will be plenty of ways to block any attempts by Trump to try and mess with the supreme court because the left will be absolutely livid at a Trump presidency. One of the good things about the election system they have is there are all kinds of checks and balances precisely designed to prevent a president running rampant on their own without any oversight.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I want you to specifically explain why his policies would lead to the disaster you're claiming.

I can sum it up with "after all of his blustering, most Americans don't even know what his campaign platform is".

Where does he stand on LGBT discrimination? Where does he stand on military matters? What is his position on foreign relations with belligerent nations? What is his plan for international amnesty and peaceful relations with UN and NATO powers?

How does he plan to address the education system in America that is failing young boys? How does he plan to address the justice system that fails everyone? What does he plan to do about health care for people who are too poor for private insurance but not poor enough for subsidized health care?

That's the problem. I have no idea where he stands on any of this because he's been treating the election season like a reality show.

Granted, I don't have an answer to all of those questions in relation to Hillary Clinton either, but she has worked in government for the last ten years and America hasn't collapsed completely. When she left the Senate, it wasn't on fire. When she worked as Secretary of State, she didn't cause any wars or disasters. Okay, some email thing happened. It wouldn't be the first time that someone in their late 60s failed to understand how the Internet works.

Like with your claims about LGBT discrimination, do you have any actual evidence of policy or his attitude towards them that indicates he'd behave in such a way towards gays?

I dunno, why don't you #AskTheGays?

Jokes aside, he's been both a bit supportive sometimes and really homophobic sometimes. So, kinda terrified of what to expect.

I think I saw it best explained through analogy on Twitter, of all places. Someone accused Clinton of being corrupt, and defended Trump as merely being "unqualified" as a leader, to which the reply was, Would you rather your pilot be corrupt, or unqualified?

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

When she worked as Secretary of State, she didn't cause any wars or disasters.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/16/hillary-clinton-responsibility-embassy-attack

How does he plan to address the education system in America that is failing young boys?

Annoyingly, education is one of the issues I agree with him on, Trump has actually decided on a policy of abolishing common core education, which I completely agree with and it's pretty easy to look this stuff up, it's on his website. I agree that he does a lot of granstanding but it should be up to voters to research their candidates properly rather than just blindly believing everything on television.

He's playing the media because he knows exactly how it works and he's using their own system against them.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Taking responsibility for a security breach is a far cry from being responsible for a war. And I have no idea why you're linking The Guardian, the feministiest thing to be online and still call itself news. But, we all make mistakes.

Trump has actually decided on a policy of abolishing common core education

What? Standardized education is a bad thing? How? I went to his website and his stance on education is summed up in a 51-second video where he just says he's going to get rid of the Common Core standards and "make education a priority". What does that mean?

Now, having been to his website, it's clear that his positions are so vague that even he doesn't know what he's going to do!

Law Enforcement: He wants to give them more authority, and more respect. How?

Second Amendment: He wants to solidify the Second Amendment. "I won't let them take away our guns!" How does he plan to address the dozens of mass shootings in the United States, or the gun murders committed by Americans, against other Americans? Give them rocket launchers? Hard to tell, especially when his video on the topic is just 29 seconds long!

Political Correctness: I'm not sure, but I think he wants to somehow get rid of politically correct language? What does that mean?

Illegal Immigration: Oh, he's still calling for a wall at the Mexican border. I'm assuming he doesn't realize that Mexico and the United States share shorelines with the Pacific Ocean. And what does he plan to do about Cuban refugees who sneak in on boats to Florida? Or Chinese illegals smuggled into California's harbours? Does he also plan to build a wall to prevent Canadians from coming south?

Unification: He says he will "unify the country". How?

Military: "I will make our military so big, so powerful, so strong, that nobody and I mean nobody is gonna mess with us." For a businessman, he is failing at Economics 101. You don't build the world's largest army for defense. You build the world's largest army in order to go to war, because the only way a military can be a profitable venture is if you can use said military to secure resources at least as valuable as the expenditure of said military force. This is the same man who said America should have never gone to Iraq.

Jobs: He claims that he will be "the greatest jobs-producing President that God ever created". Powerful stuff. But how will he do that?

The Economy: He says he has a great tax plan (which involves simplifying the tax code and reducing income taxes) that will somehow reduce the 19 trillion-dollar debt. How? Lower taxes means less government revenue. If that's the case, who is going to pay all those soldiers he is planning to have in his biggest army ever? How is he going to enact his plan to tighten immigration control? Who will pay for the Muslim Registry?

Essentially, I actually know less now about Trump's campaign platform than I did before going to his website!

[–]omegaphallic -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Celebs are allowed to have opinions, and I don't blame them for opposing Trump. I oppose both Trump and Hillary.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The point is that these are influential people and they are using their influence for ill.

[–]omegaphallic -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Its a lose-lose proposition and they have a right to their opinions.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They may have a right to their opinions, but because they have influence they also have an obligation to make sure those opinions aren't shit.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter