Here is the link, but I'll paste some of the highlights below.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/domestic-violence-industry/tough-new-domestic-violence-laws-proposed-for-britain/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=tough-new-domestic-violence-laws-proposed-for-britain

By the author (a british politician)

Infinitely more important than the feminist-inspired gender bias of the article, the proposed legislation will inevitably result in huge numbers of miscarriages of injustice against men. A few observations on the legislation, and predictions on how the police and the courts system will respond to it:

  1. A new area for false allegations is created. This will be a charter for malicious women (who haven’t been abused) to make false domestic abuse allegations – in effect, to abuse their partners, possibly not for the first time. In the vast majority of cases, who but the two people involved will know the truth? Which will the police and the courts believe?

  2. Most domestic abuse is reciprocal, but most people reporting the abuse will be women, as currently. Being the first partner to report the abuse, the woman will be more likely to be believed by the police, quite aside from the default presumption (never admitted publicly, of course) of the police that women are more likely than men to tell the truth.

  3. 70% of the victims of uni-directional domestic abuse (the victims ‘take it’ or exit the situation) are men. But we know from British Crime Survey statistics that men are far less likely than women to report abuse, often because they know that if they did so, their relationships would end, and it’s likely they’ll never see their children again. If after a prolonged series of attacks over time an exasperated man finally lost control and struck his partner, whose account of events would the police believe? The woman’s, inevitably. The police would point out that the man hadn’t reported being a victim of abuse to them previously, so his version of events couldn’t be trusted.

  4. The maximum prison term of 14 years is grotesquely high. A woman who kills her partner in cold blood – e.g. by plunging a kitchen knife into his chest while he slept – need only claim she’d ‘feared’ him, by way of mitigation. She need produce no evidence that she had any grounds to fear him. The charge will then automatically be downgraded from murder to manslaughter, and she’ll probably serve under five years with good behaviour. A man, by contrast, under the proposed domestic abuse legislation, could serve 14 years for domestic abuse. It’s utterly inconceivable that even in the most grotesque cases any woman would serve 14 years.

  5. As with other offences, men will be far more likely than women to be charged, regardless of the weight of evidence. They’ll be more likely to be convicted. They’ll be more likely to be incarcerated, and if they are, they’ll serve much longer sentences.

This is nothing less than a major intensification of the state-sponsored and state-enforced war against British men. The balance of power in intimate relationships between men and women already favours women strongly. It’s about to tilt women’s way yet further. Vast numbers of British women are going to exercise that additional power, and ruthlessly. Not only marriage (and the nuclear family with it) are dying. This legislation will in time prove to be a death sentence for unmarried couples’ relationships.

Something the author later said in the comments

Thanks kronk3. I once knew a woman who admitted having bashed a brick against her face and body before making a false allegation of abuse against her boyfriend, the mildest man on the planet. His brutal treatment at the hands of the police very nearly led to him committing suicide. Another night he woke up around midnight to find her poised over him with a carving knife in her hand, about to plunge it into his chest. The police had no interest in looking into the matter, and he belatedly ended the relationship. This all came back to me yesterday when I saw Spetsnaz’s amazing video on female psychopaths.

What is abuse?

I looked it up myself and the UK gov site (https://www.gov.uk/domestic-violence-and-abuse) seems to not have that much information yet. It does say that there is a new definition of abuse and that it is one of these 5 types:

  • psychological

  • physical

  • sexual

  • financial

  • emotional

If you try to get them to define what these terms entail you are instead redirected to the 'Ending violence against women and girls in the UK' policy.

The next most legitimate site is the NHS which does answer what the definitions are: http://www.domesticviolencelondon.nhs.uk/1-what-is-domestic-violence-/3-emotional-or-psychological-abuse.html

Emotional abuse includes verbal abuse such as yelling, name-calling, blaming and shaming

Urgh, thats typical men! to prison with you all!

Financial abuse makes the least sense, as surely its covered by fraud/theft and we don't need feminist laws?

Economic or financial abuse aims to limit a victim's ability to access help. Tactics may include controlling the finances; withholding money or credit cards; making someone unreasonably account for money spent/petrol used;

Basically this is the ultimate form of legally enforcing commitment on men without marriage. Being in a relationship is all it takes to blackmail for more resources. If you have lots of arguments and end up breaking up a LTR.... and she is emotional and angry at you, and has a list of things you didnt buy, credit cards you didnt give PINs to, that one time you shouted, those few times you were very dominant in bed without asking to be extra dominant (but she loved it and it was fine at the time/always has been).... guess whats going to happen to you.