(This is something I plan to submit to Return of Kings after I revise and add sources. Figured I'd submit to Already Red to see what you guys think and if it would even be worth submitting to RoK. You guys are basically my test audience, since TRP is pretty much drowned out with noise.)

Edit: I forgot to mention what inspired me to write this. Some retard bluepiller on Reddit who wants to be a cop and is going to end up either very corrupt or very cynical. http://redditlog.com/snapshots/111161

I should be your enemy. Technically, I am. I am already trained by the military and have completed training in a police academy. My classmates are already going on to careers in law enforcement. I opted to instead finish my degree, and may even cause more harm by joining the FBI or the NSA. For all intents and purposes, I am the bad guy, for I will soon be the enforcer for the progressive nightmare that is stripping our freedoms by one piece of legislation at a time.

However, the truth can be denied for only so long. Just as military service is causing the eyes of everyone who serves to be forcefully ripped open, one can only remain blind for so long when faced with the legal realities of what an officer is required to enforce. Police officers and military face an even higher rate of divorce (70%), and deal with the realities of domestic violence at a nearly daily rate. This is what I learned that makes blindness inexcusable.

Female victims of domestic violence will lash out against her white knights.

We all know the same old story that is constantly beat into our heads about Bad Men and Sad Wives(tm), so I don't need to rehash. However, in learning to be a police officer, when we went over domestic violence, our instructor (a divorcee, mind you), told us how after subduing the man, we need to then treat the woman with just as much suspicion. As facts and FBI crime statistics have proven, after the abuser has been subdued, the victim is very likely to violently lash out at police officers. Why is this? Many reasons, such as the usual explanation of Stockholm Syndrome and the simple fact that he is the breadwinner. Either way, many, many training scenarios involve the wife of the abuser taking a weapon and attacking the officer, sometimes resulting in the officer's death.

Most Men who beat their wives are not sociopaths and hold deep trauma.

Same with the story of Bad Men and Sad Wives, the men who tend towards abuse are deeply broken individuals. We've all heard how abusive fathers make abusive sons, but as we look deeper into the past of such men, we find that it's about a 50/50 shot that the son will follow the sins of the father (I should know). Instead we find that only a minority of abusive men are monstrous sociopaths who enjoy hurting their wives, while the majority are instead men who suffer deep abandonment issues due to being raised by an abusive or negligent single mother. That's right, more often than having an abusive father, the men who are most likely to grow up to be wife beaters are the men who grew up without a father.

So, who continues the abuse?

The most uncomfortable finding that the FBI has discovered (and likes to suppress) is that men who abused a wife or girlfriend, after suffering their legal punishment and getting psychiatric help they need, do not often go on to abuse the next woman. However, the woman who was abused, will go on to her next boyfriend or husband, and will find herself in the exact same cycle once more.

Just as interesting, is the amount of women who refuse to leave the abusive husband. Around 70% of battered women will NOT leave the relationship. They will continue a vicious cycle over and over again. This is one reason why many policemen become extremely cynical.

The Office of Special Investigations actually had an accurate method to determine false rape claims.

This was something I had learned in my own police academy. One of my instructors was a 20 year Air Force veteran and 18 year Deputy Sheriff. He had spent most of his Air Force career in the OSI (basically, the Army and Air Force's version of NCIS, for those not familiar) and most of his time as a county cop as a homicide and vice detective. During his time in the Air Force, he told us about how the OSI had developed a method that could determine false rape reports with 95% accuracy. As expected, a feminist senator caught wind of it and immediately shut it down (I guess we should've seen that coming). Since then, some agencies have been using that method and succeeding in outing false rape accusations.

(Still trying to find the data needed. Since Obama got re-elected, getting FBI crime statistics is a lot harder than it used to be, any help would be appreciated.)

Edit: This is very rough draft. Critiques are welcome.

Edit 4/1/2014: To all those interested in the method used to determine false rape accusations; I am currently contacting my academy class and trying to get in contact with my instructor to find out the details. I remember that the OSI was really pissed off about losing this method because it was good for more than just false rape accusations. Trust me, if I can get that information, I will be posting the methods on TRP and here on a post all its own.