This is so demonstrably false

Rural_Dictionary939

May 20, 2026

102 upvotes

/r/EverydayMisandry

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	This is so demonstrably false
Author	Rural_Dictionary939
Upvotes	102
Comments	14
Date	May 20, 2026 10:51 PM UTC (2 months ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1tj1wcq/this_is_so_demonstrably_false/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/this-is-so-demonstrably-false.1580855 https://theredarchive.com/post/1580855

[–]Tiny_Professional358 65 points66 points67 points 2 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]AfghanistanIsTaliban 15 points16 points17 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Atreigas 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ConcentrateNo2949 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Dry_Fact_4584 -17 points-16 points-15 points 2 months ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]One-Impress9145[🍰] 32 points33 points34 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]couldntyoujust1 33 points34 points35 points 2 months ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]Nicherix 8 points9 points10 points 2 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]DeliciousSTD 7 points8 points9 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]couldntyoujust1 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Be born to? No. Not being born at all because you were killed in tbe womb will always be worse than being "born in an unloving family." Nobody is forcing the child to do that either. Birth is a function of their mother's body, not a behavior on the part of the unborn child.

And statistically, the idea that unwanted children fare worse is not what the data shows. The child most likely to experience abuse by their parents are actually the children most wanted by their parents: adopted children. Meanwhile accidentally conceived or not, unwanted pregnancy or not, children parented by their biological parents fare the best.

If a woman wants a child and opts to seduce a random guy at a party to conceive one, then I think that's awful and should be roundly socially condemned and the guy shouldn't have to pay child support. I might even be convinced that such should be illegal since single mothers tend to be the parents who produce the worst outcomes.

In the meantime, abortion represents a feminine super-privilege she holds over men and children as a class and equality would demand that women not be given that privilege over all others.

[–]Nicherix 1 point2 points3 points 2 months ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Not being born at all because you were killed in tbe womb will always be worse than being "born in an unloving family."

Worse in what terms? On what mesure? Bringing an unwanted child to life benefits nobody. The Erth is critically overpopulated already, we don't need more peaple. If the parents aren't ready to take accountability to provide the child into life, it's morally right to kill it before it becomes a person.

The child most likely to experience abuse by their parents are actually the children most wanted by their parents: adopted children.

According to how hard it is to make child observation service let you adopt a child, your statement is just nonsense. Only the most reliable parents can adopt a child, while every drunkard bastard and coke addicted whore can just make a baby naturally and it'd be a lot of job to take the baby away from them.

No, the true equality demands that men have this privilege too, at least in form of paper abortions. I think it's fair enough, in case if surrogacy is legalized and included to medical enshurance.

[–]couldntyoujust1 -1 points0 points1 point 2 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Worse morally. The data simply does not bear out that being born of an unwanted pregnancy results in a bad life by any objective measure. Meanwhile, being adopted or fostered actually does increase the likelihood that the child will be abused because proportionally more abused children are abused by adoptive or foster parents - ostensibly parents who wanted them.

Secondly, the earth is nowhere near close to "overpopulated". This is a myth in virtually every sense of the word. We overproduce food in proportion to population, all of humanity could leave the rest of the planet empty living with a 5 square mile parcel each per family in a land-mass the size of texas. We've been told over and over that energy will run out and yet we keep finding more and more energy resources in the ground. Fracking and horizontal drilling is why gas prices dropped at the end of Obama's second term despite his policies causing them to increase by more than a dollar per gallon in the US. Potable water is a rapidly renewable resource. There's just no evidence for this supposed overpopulation. The problem moreso is ineffective distribution. People congregate in cities, local areas and political boundaries force people into crowded spaces despite the availability of more land, food distribution is often hindered by everything from geography to terrorism.

Thirdly, any abortion is not killing anyone before they become a person. That would require the destruction of sperm or egg. What is destroyed in an abortion is a person - a genetically and physiologically individual, living, human being. It is a fundamental moral atrocity to kill an unborn child.

You can call my observation of the abuse data "nonsense" but in fact it is not. The data is the data. A proportional majority of child abuse victims are abused by adoptive or foster parents. All it takes to remove a child from biological parents into the foster care system is a CPS worker who opines that such is the best course of action. The system actually incentivizes removals in a lot of cases.

Finally, as for paper abortions, it simply meets one atrocity with another and doesn't solve the problem. See, if a dad wants to step up and care for the child, the woman can deny the man that right to his child by having an abortion. Actually, she can even deny him that if she fails to get an abortion before time runs out. She can give birth to the child, and then drop that child off at any "safe harbor" for a closed adoption and the father does not have any right to stop her. Worse, he has no right and nobody has a duty to even notify him that she has become pregnant with his child, nor that she has given birth to the child. Paper abortions do not balance the scale.

[–]Nicherix 0 points1 point2 points 2 months ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Secondly, the earth is nowhere near close to "overpopulated". all of humanity could leave the rest of the planet empty living with a 5 square mile parcel each per family in a land-mass the size of texas.

You say like humans are the only species that needs area. Humans have already destroyed too much nature just for surviving, and the more population density the worse destructions.

What is destroyed in an abortion is a person

No, it's not. Foetus has no personality, no memory, no speaking, no thinking and no feelings. It's just a clod of flesh. There's nothing morally wrong in preventing it from turning into a human.

You can call my observation of the abuse data "nonsense" but in fact it is not. The data is the data.

So where's the data? You link to some data for severalth time but yet haven't shown those data. Seemingly you just made up your data.

if a dad wants to step up and care for the child, the woman can deny the man that right to his child by having an abortion

A dad cannot have rights for the child before the child exists. And no, it doesn't happen at the moment of conception.

She can give birth to the child, and then drop that child off at any "safe harbor" for a closed adoption and the father does not have any right to stop her.

That's gruesome of course but not related to the abortion issue.

Worse, he has no right and nobody has a duty to even notify him that she has become pregnant with his child, nor that she has given birth to the child.

Actually paper abortion is supposed to solve this problem too as every dad will get to know he's about to become a dad within first three months of pregnancy.

[–]enemy_of_misandry 24 points25 points26 points 2 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Comments