article is a female serving shrine, though the comments.. "Tim" gets it and is amazing. i recommend reading all the comments. if he's here among us, thank you brother!

BukM1 · 2016-09-04T11:27:50+00:00

"When people complain of men not marrying (even they who are able), they forget how little women offer in exchange for all they get by marriage. Girls are seldom taught to be of any use whatever to a man, so that I am astonished only at the numbers of men who do marry! Many girls do not even try to be agreeable to look at, much less to live with. They forget how numerous they are, and the small absolute need men have of wives; but, nevertheless, men do still marry, and would oftener marry could they find mates — women who are either helpful to them, or amusing, or pleasing to their eye."

This should be on the fucking side bar, absolute 100% truth

Mojo_666 · 2016-09-04T10:56:10+00:00

Once upon a time, a prince proposed to a princess. The princess refused. The prince lived happily ever after. The end.

Tim is cool.

scorched_throwaway · 2016-09-04T09:04:16+00:00

to the downvote bot. /dev/null will getcha, eventually.

azureknightgx · 2016-09-04T11:37:10+00:00

the comments are fucking hilarious, the woman saying all men are boys and that finn guy saying that women are bringing stuff to the table outside of incessant bitching and whinging about how life is unfair.

JStheHammer · 2016-09-04T11:18:33+00:00

Tim is right

veetkoosh · 2016-09-04T15:49:09+00:00

Young men need to be taught that women are not their friends and are instead their competitors and adversaries – even within marriage.

I don't think there's a truth that's more fundamental to humanity (not to mention the health of males).

SnapshillBot · 2016-09-04T08:21:51+00:00

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

This Post - 1, 2, 3

^{I am a bot.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

scorched_throwaway · 2016-09-04T16:06:31+00:00

The comment by "Tim" is entertaining, but only partially correct, per example, I always find statements like the following to be rather humorous:

Where will it all end? It will end in socialism. Feminism is Marxism in panties – a socialist government being the end goal of progressives.

Now some of that -- the "end goal" and that "Feminism is Marxism" -- is entirely true.

What isn't true though is that that is where it will "end." It won't "end" there because -- despite Marx's bullshit claims, "socialism" is not some "last stage" of societal evolution, but rather simply a wholly perverse "inversion" of a society -- socialism/marxist "civilizations" (if they can even be called that unironically) are by definition self-destructive, they are an "UN-civilizational" movement -- they only survive for (historically speaking) relatively short times (usually less than one human lifespan), essentially only so long as it takes them to eat up the saved "seed corn" of the society that they take over, and so long as the infrastructure (both physical and social) of that civilization endures (as it slowly crumbles through neglect and abuse). Exactly how long that is depends on how much seed corn has been saved (and of how much other adjacent nations are willing to "gift" it), and how robust the infrastructure was.

Per example this:

Sweden is the future of the world.

Is nonsense. Sweden is currently in a transition; when it became socialist it already was (i.e. started off as) as both a very wealthy, "hard work ethic," and a "high trust" society -- each of those things has been steadily eroded and undermined during the past several decades of "socialism" -- the wealth has been squandered (and much of what ostensibly remains is merely "notational" wealth, that is an accounting illusion or fantasy, rather than real assets); the work ethic has been subverted, and the "trust" has essentially been destroyed... Sweden (like the other Nordic & European "socialist" states) has peaked and begun it's downward slide.

A better example of the "future of the world" (i.e. the future of so called "socialist" states) would be Venezuela; which is much further along the path and approaching full-blown collapse.

Another example would be Russia -- under Putin -- as an example of (one possible) societal reconstruction path that can/will take place in the aftermath of the socialist/marxist societal collapse (there are of course other possible post-socialist paths, most of them far worse).

KingOfYaks · 2016-09-04T17:52:03+00:00

Thanks for posting the link. I found it very entertaining, and in particular, the feminist point of view. Even as a guy who has never been burned by a woman (life long MGTOW, age 44) just hearing their arguments gets my hackles up! I just love it when I hear "We don't need no man!" because they may just get their wish soon. When shit hits the fan and all them men are dead or off to war, and there's nobody left in the homeland to pay attention to them, fix their car, take charge of emergencies and pay them child support and alimony... When big daddy government is holding on for dear life and putting all efforts toward things not related to single-mom welfare... Only then will we see them realize the truth. And here's the truth:

Through history women have sought the company of men to provide and protect. They'd sneak into the cave, and when noticed stick their ass in the air hoping that what they offered was sufficient. Today they hold a bunch of do-nothing jobs and think they're equal to men, but if you flew over New York and looked down at that horizon-to-horizon city, I dare you to point to anything built by a woman. Not one brick. Not one power pole, sewer, road, sky scraper... nothing. Yet they're down there 'working' in HR departments and answering phones. When society finally breaks down, either they will seek the protection and support of one of the few remaining men or they'll take themselves out of the gene pool-- Just another skull in the ditch. Hopefully I'm around long enough to see it unfold before my eyes. I'll only be a spectator though. Keep on moving ladies-- Nothing for you here.

Zombocom1911 · 2016-09-04T18:14:06+00:00

American society has become anti-male. Men are sensing the backlash and are consciously and unconsciously going “on strike.” They are dropping out of college, leaving the workforce and avoiding marriage and fatherhood at alarming rates. The trend is so pronounced that a number of books have been written about this “man-child” phenomenon, concluding that men have taken a vacation from responsibility simply because they can. But why should men participate in a system that seems to be increasingly stacked against them?

great writing.

FabiusMaximus99 · 2016-09-04T14:16:43+00:00

Why do you say this article is a "female serving shrine"? It shows data, then several perspectives on it. The title points to "Men going Galt", the opposite of a feminist analysis.

scorched_throwaway · 2016-09-04T17:39:58+00:00

The George Gilder book wasn't wrong, just early and likely put everyone in the same basket. From my view point, there are two classes forming the US: The have nothings and the haves. There are those who are ultra haves (ie: Rich), but for the most part, if two adults act appropriate in their spending habits, get an education or special skill set, it doesn't take much money to live a fairly comfortable life in most places in the US.

What I'm seeing in my Midwest area is that the rural, small city/town areas are becoming just like the inner city areas. Kids are being born out-of-wedlock, these guys aren't doing the "right thing" anymore and getting married. The economic situation is so bleak that many of these young people party and pain pills became a popular thing to take to get high. We now have many cities and towns with huge heroin problems. Numerous ODs, one region where 200ish people have contracted HIV due to shooting an opium based pain medicine.

One the flip side, I work with many young people who are college educated. About 1/4th-1/3rd of the small groups I end up working with will have serious relationships early in life, some hold overs from high school. About half or so will likely have had nothing during high school and depending on how they change, will either hookup for years (even if they want a relationship), date around and get some STRs, or some might find someone wanting an LTR. It could be a mix as well. About 1/4th of the guys seem to want to hook up, to them it is all about no feelings, 100% casual NSA, and quantity (quality depends on the guy). Lots of these NSA guys proudly claim that they don't see settling down until they are close to 30, and a few say they will never get married. The future of the country really depends on this group of guys. The educated, decent to high income earners, and what they do in terms of marriage and having kids. Even those who might have partied for two or three years in college and seriously talking marriage already with current LTRs. I do think there is some hope for this younger generation, they seem to be open more about sex, but they also seem to be rejecting the "you must be non-monogamous and promiscuous until your 30s" lifestyle that some people write about.

Those people in the dying rust belt cities and towns with addiction problems and having kids out-of-wedlock are causing issues with social services. The old money (UAW union wage) is quickly drying up or moving out. Will be interesting to see how this all plays out.

DarthExero · 2016-09-04T20:48:37+00:00

Feminists have long been asking for different gender roles for both men and women, however most of the gender roles they want for women are more or less just taking on the benefits of masculinity (a high paycheck) but any new gender roles for men need to go through their vetting process which determines if we are allowed to take on this gender role.

If I want to wear a dress and paint my nails yet still identify as a man, that is ok. If I want to go my own way and not have the role of seeking out a woman to protect and take care of, well that just makes me a child. That is not approved as our new gender roles.

And that whole MGTOW thing is the new gender role for men. Even if they don't know it. Men don't want to get married.

mgtow_bob · 2016-09-05T02:06:26+00:00

Ha, all I know, there's no women doing garbage collection. And a whole lot of other industries I can think of.

Comments