Cosmo article: Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm — and Why That's a Bad Thing

RPangerandacceptance · 2018-08-13T15:11:45+00:00

Let me summarize. We hate men so much that even when they are eating our snatch for our pleasure, the fact that they enjoy seeing us enjoy ourselves pisses us off.

It’s laughable that they call this horseshit a “study”

MGTOW-Balance · 2018-08-13T15:19:31+00:00

oh fuck, this man hating shit is relentless!! as if women don't get feminine achievement points when the man cums hard. females love knowing they "drove the man crazy with lust"

but yet a man can't get the same satisfaction by making a woman cum? on TOP of the fact that he's doing the majority of the work?

damn cosmo once again you've earn it #FuckYouToo

DangZagnut · 2018-08-13T15:35:50+00:00

Everything about this article is medically retarded.

It's not enough that men are already having more orgasms than women.

Already the lies start. Women can have far more orgasms than men, because there's no refractory period between them like a man. Anyone that's wasted time with a woman with vibrator knows you can squeeze a half dozen out of them. They sure as hell can't do that.

To make matters worse, a new study published in the Journal of Sex Research found — aside from deriving pleasure from their own orgasms, obviously — men also derive a specific sort of masculine pleasure from making female partners orgasm. The researchers in the study, Sara Chadwick and Sari van Anders, refer to this incredibly predictable phenomenon as a "masculinity achievement." I'm not exactly sure what that means, but I imagine a "masculinity achievement" looks something like Super Mario punching a coin out of one of those floating boxes in the video game.

Why do you care why it's happening? Just more man hating? Just checking.

The study gathered 810 men to read a story where they had to imagine an "attractive woman" either did or did not orgasm during sex with them. Each man was then asked to rate their sexual esteem and the extent to which they'd feel "masculine" after experiencing the scenario. The results are what you'd expect: Men felt more masculine and felt high self esteem when they imagined a woman orgasmed during sex with them. "These results suggest that women's orgasms do function — at least in part — as a masculinity achievement for men," researchers wrote.

So pseudo-science. I think they're over thinking this. You are supposed to waste time "pleasuring' the woman or she will cunt and bitch and nag and reee and cunt and bitch and nag and reee and cunt and bitch and nag and reee so you waste time fingerbinging them, going down on them, or vibing them to shut them the fuck up.

Let's be clear — there's nothing wrong with feeling good about making your partner feel good (in this case, orgasming). It's nice to bring pleasure to your partner! But the researchers point out a sexist flaw in the masculinity boost thing.

Clearly their is something wrong. It's wrong think. If it's sexist what happens when two gays do it? Or two dykes? Are they being misogynists?

"Despite increasing focus on women's orgasms, research indicated that the increased attention to women's orgasms may also serve men's sexuality, complicating conceptualizations of women's orgasms as women-centric," researchers wrote.

Oh noes! A man might like wasting time giving his bitch a 'gasm (to shut her the fuck up). The horrors!

In a separate statement from Chadwick and van Anders, they explained why it's a bad thing for men to gain masculinity points for bringing female partners to orgasm. "One reason is that it might pressure some heterosexual men to feel like they have to 'give' women orgasms, as if orgasm is something men pulled out of a hat and presented to women," they wrote. "This ties into cultural ideas of women as passive recipients of whatever men give them."

Yes, if you have any positive ego from giving an orgasm, that's bad. That's why I make sure when a chick sucks me off, I don't orgasm, I think of baseball, then berate her for being horrible at it, and she should feel bad for being a sexual failure. What the fuck is wrong with these feminists man haters?

Do you think they'll realize that most men aren't even thinking about the woman they're fucking but instead, are thinking of someone they're actually attracted to?

They also mention another sexist orgasm trope: women feeling pressured to fake orgasms in order to appease a male partner, or in their words, "to protect men's feelings." For women who have sex with male partners, the pressure to orgasm is a relatable feeling. Hence all the faking that we know is going down in hetero bedrooms all over the country.

Mostly they fake orgasms because they're bored.

Listen bull dyke feminist cunts. You started this shit. You bitched and moaned about men not "taking care of your needs" and "being selfish", so now men waste all this bullshit time shutting you up, and now you're bitching about that.

This is just like during an argument, even if you agree with her, she'll accuse you of having a "tone of voice", you know, like a bitching cunt.

If you have to fake it, then shut the fuck up about it. Your orgasms are not important to anything to do with sex. As feminism states, you're all holes to masturbate inside. That's it. No more. No less. Back to the factory, comrade.

The researchers draw a fairly frightening conclusion from the research findings. When women's orgasms begin to serve as a masculinity achievement for male partners, the orgasms cease to be about women's liberation or sexual pleasure. They just become another opportunity for men to flex, or "shore up their sense of masculinity."

Frightening!? Really? Why the fuck do you care? You're getting to orgasm, rather than your "needs" being ignored. You should be happy anyone is wasting time with you whatsoever. Who gives a shit? If you're sucking my cock or suck starting my balls, I don't give a fuck what you're thinking about. You validate nothing in my life.

"These men, therefore, were more likely to view women's orgasms as a notch on the bedpost of their manliness," Chadwick and van Anders wrote in the statement. They end their note with an encouragement for men to think of orgasms less as achievements to be unlocked, and truly view them for what they are: tiny little pleasure explosions that should be enjoyed — frequently — by female partners.

Again, so what? Women do that with blowjobs. Women are far more worried about lack of sexual ability that guys, because women a) never take responsibility for anything, and b) when they fail, they can't handle the rejection of a bad sexual experience. You suck at sex, since you primarily lie there and do nothing at all, then stop bitching.

In fact stop you bitching, whining, cutting, ree-ing, and all your other fucking stupid shit. Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

rationalthought314 · 2018-08-13T16:40:32+00:00

Men felt more masculine and felt high self esteem when they imagined a woman orgasmed during sex with them.

so? Women complain about guys pumping them and rolling over to sleep 2 minutes later and now this bitch Hannah Smothers (really?) complains about men who feel masculine for making a woman orgasm? You don't make them cum, they complain. You make them cum, they complain.

I think what is underlying here is that many women resent it when their beta partner makes them cum because that's for chad/tyrone. They don't want the beta to think they have any power over her which is why she will often lie there waiting for it to be over in order to crush his spirits.

Delita_Wasnt_Wrong · 2018-08-13T16:18:03+00:00

How is a woman’s orgasm tied to women’s liberation? Men aren’t stopping them from masturbating. Every single thing is about female empowerment now, it’s retarded.

2018-08-13T15:01:20+00:00

Why would I be happy if I scored a touchdown or met my sales targets. Trust me, the carp more if they don't finish.

silive · 2018-08-13T16:09:35+00:00

"Cosmopolitan" should really be renamed "Feminazi". Some truth in advertisement would not hurt at all, methinks....

Llodarr · 2018-08-13T16:54:11+00:00

Discussing an article from Cosmo is akin to debating quantum mechanics with a toddler.

aholf_ditler_1889 · 2018-08-13T15:50:08+00:00

Not reding the article because I value my mental well being

AmbitiousTank · 2018-08-13T16:51:45+00:00

Wow, so according to that article feeling a sence of acheivement after giving her an orgasm is bad?

Fuck that! Let her do her own work than!

ABrokenBeing · 2018-08-13T17:25:47+00:00

No more orgasms while the males are present!

These crazy bitches just out there trying to ruin it for the women too lol

MenGoingTOWin · 2018-08-13T21:12:39+00:00

Is this what "Gender Studies" science is?

Here's what they did: They got 800 some men together and told them one of two stories. In one story, they made the girl cum, in the other they didn't. Then they asked them if they felt more manly and successful if they had made the girl cum. Most men said yes because they accomplished hte goal in the story they were told.

From this the female Gender Studies "scientists" infer that men get a masculinity hit, which he therefore oppressed the women by enjoying the fact that he made her cum in the story.

Wow. This sounds like they finally had to provide some "study" for their 200,000 $ in grant money and they just winged something in 15 minutes which says nothing because it is based in tautology.

crawlwalkruuu · 2018-08-13T21:34:36+00:00

Uhh yeah you should feel like more of a man if youre giving bitches orgasms, that means youre doing your fucking job right.

I-am-the-lul · 2018-08-13T21:47:50+00:00

Why do women hate seeing men happy so much?

Zombocom1911 · 2018-08-13T22:54:08+00:00

its bad because they are losing control of their ability to manipulate, plot and scheme, for that brief moment, females can never allow that

kikkamokkeli · 2018-08-13T23:10:17+00:00

The study gathered 810 men to read a story where they had to imagine an "attractive woman" either did or did not orgasm during sex with them. Each man was then asked to rate their sexual esteem and the extent to which they'd feel "masculine" after experiencing the scenario.

Every single magazine, and in later times the MSM has been headlining for 40 years how women can't get off. Now when men are actually learning to get women off, women are the victims of that? Just incomprehensible. FU.

Sandbagicus · 2018-08-13T20:27:58+00:00

This 'study' is bullshit. I bet that 99% of women having an orgasm could not care less what the man is thinking during her O. They're just happy to be getting off.

AllahHatesFags · 2018-08-13T20:33:32+00:00

Cosmo should have been shut down decades ago. That rag is cancer.

satanssockpuppet · 2018-08-13T20:43:15+00:00

It's a garbage magazine catering to garbage people. Those Cosmo "sex tips" make porn seem realistic in comparison.

Cosmo article: Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm — and Why That's a Bad Thing

Comments

Only when we end the orgasim, in all its forms, will we have a perfect society!

Title	Cosmo article: Why Guys Get Turned on When You Orgasm — and Why That's a Bad Thing
Author	evilandrzej
Upvotes	76
Comments	24
Date	August 13, 2018 2:56 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/96yywm/cosmo_article_why_guys_get_turned_on_when_you/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/cosmo-article-why-guys-get-turned-on-when-you.510364 https://theredarchive.com/post/510364