~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
kstunta
[–]Infinitewisdom198478 points79 points80 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
You know what my solution is? Monk mode..
[–]MarzMonkey25 points26 points27 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
It's that or get the snip snip
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]MarzMonkey14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Ain't signing no damn birth certificate; fuck 'em.
[–]Vlad_the_imp_hailer21 points22 points23 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
You don’t have to. She just put you down as the father and presto!
[–]Haywood_Jablomie426 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why the fuck would you ever give a bitch your full name?
[–]Abdulilah2 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's when you just fuck off to another country.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarthSchadenfreude3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
People call it "the state" but what it really breaks down to is someone makes an unjust decision. I would, to be humane, would give that decision making person a choice: change your decision or everything they love dies.
I would realistically get arrested for that, but I wouldn't be in jail forever. Then when I get out, that decision making person comes home to find his or her entire family tied up, soaked in gasoline, and they get to watch everything they love die screaming.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]DarthSchadenfreude0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well, if you take the general attitude of those who write and enforce the laws that "ignorance of the law is no excuse", that essentially argues "ignorance is not innocence".
I say let that "ignorance is not innocence" cut both ways. I say if someone acts like a concentration camp guard, go after their family, because their family's ignorance is not innocence and the family is benefiting from their salary they receive for doing their unethical job, i.e. "ill-gotten gains".
[–]SpiderKnife1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This * 1000. What the men's rights movement doesn't understand is that they will never achieve their goals through the system. So personal, extralegal consequences need to be applied when men are treated unjustly.
[–]rfoconnor1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
In some cases that can and have.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SJHammer0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I believe its about 70% effective. Plenty of men have had kids while on testosterone
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SJHammer0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Both of those articles mention adding progestin to the testosterone...I'm not sure testosterone is 99% effective on its own. Ive seen similar articles that mention the mix. I completely see that it works, but I meant testosterone on its own might not be effective enough.
I definitely agree testosterone is great for men, especially men in their 40's and more.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MarzMonkey1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Luckily I'm in Canada, so despite the massive Divorce rape laws, even if a dumb chick cucks me; I'd be in the clear, because their kid would mean dirt to me;
http://parkercompany.ca/project/non-biological-parents-child-support-the-chartier-decision/
In Chartier, the Supreme Court listed a number of factors to help determine whether the step-parent stands in the place of a parent such that the step-parent will be responsible to pay child support. These factors include, but are not limited to the following: the opinion of the child as to the relationship; the representations of the step-parent as to the relationship; whether the child participates in the extended family in the same way as would a biological child; whether the step-parent provides financially for the child (depending on ability to pay); whether the step-parent disciplines the child; whether the step-parent represents to the child, the family, and the world, either implicitly or explicitly, that he or she is responsible as a parent to the child; and the nature or existence of the child’s relationship with the absent biologcial father/mother. The Supreme Court was clear in that the breakdown of the parent/child relationship after separation is not relevant in determining whether a person stands in the place of a parent.
In Chartier, the Supreme Court listed a number of factors to help determine whether the step-parent stands in the place of a parent such that the step-parent will be responsible to pay child support. These factors include, but are not limited to the following:
the opinion of the child as to the relationship; the representations of the step-parent as to the relationship; whether the child participates in the extended family in the same way as would a biological child; whether the step-parent provides financially for the child (depending on ability to pay); whether the step-parent disciplines the child;
whether the step-parent represents to the child, the family, and the world, either implicitly or explicitly, that he or she is responsible as a parent to the child; and
the nature or existence of the child’s relationship with the absent biologcial father/mother.
The Supreme Court was clear in that the breakdown of the parent/child relationship after separation is not relevant in determining whether a person stands in the place of a parent.
[–]Haywood_Jablomie420 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Best $750 I ever spent.
[–]JoeBender1 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Grey man/ Monk mode.
It's the only way to be sure.
[–]ConstantChinner32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
More effects of the Gynocracy.
[–]scriptx118 points19 points20 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Even first wave feminists realized this double standard was wrong. We need bumper stickers of this!
[–]flee_market23 points24 points25 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
First Wave feminists actually had something to fight for. Then they got it. Whether that was good for society as a whole is up for debate/personal opinion, but then the movement couldn't just die off after it accomplished its mission - too many people had their personal identities wrapped up in "struggling" against an "oppressor", so when that oppression disappeared, they had to invent some.
I almost feel bad for first wave feminists, because if they could be around today they would jack-slap the shit out of third wave feminists. No one ever could have imagined it would have gone this far.
[–]Magnar964 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I may be wrong here, my memory sucks but I'm sure I remember reading about a woman running infront of a horse drawn carriage in protest. All the feminazis do these days is get naked and screech.
[–]DEVOmay974 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
While I agree that the first wave feminism had some noble goals, such as voting rights, it doesn't change the fact that feminism has always been a cesspool of man hating. Look up the white feather campaign to see what I mean.
[–]ThanatopsisRex2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
These movements take on a life of their own. As you suggest, the investment made by individuals in their social standing, their careers, and the institutions that support them is too great to allow a little thing like achieving their aims deter them in their perpetual "fight".
[–]Farhandlir19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Soon enough there will be additional taxes on single men and childless men.
[+][deleted] 8 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]CrackingYs 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
So legally change your gender to female and then receive all that sweet sweet female privilege money.
[–]TakuanNoho 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or partner up with your new "gay" bro.
[–]WikiTextBot8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bachelor tax
A bachelor tax is a punitive tax imposed on unmarried men. Such measures historically would be instantiated as part of a moral panic due to the important status given to marriage at various times and places. As far back as Ancient Rome and more recently in the legislatures of New Jersey and Michigan, the supposed libertine or delinquent status of bachelor men was debated and taxes proposed as a solution. Still other locations would find reason to instantiate a bachelor tax for racial reasons (such as in South Africa), nationalistic reasons, to help cover welfare programs, or more simply as a pure revenue measure.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
[–]Farhandlir5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The Romans tried that and it led to the collapse of their civilization.
[–]genericusername1231 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"the supposed libertine or delinquent status of bachelor men was debated and taxes proposed as a solution"
[–]CardboardJesusWoW 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We've had that since the 60's. Feminism was never about equality.
[–]peacejudah 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who has kids these days?! Aren’t men aware of the traps yet?
[–]JohnPerera6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck the society.
[–]ConfidentHoverhander6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
There is nothing wrong with abortion by itself. Banning it creates more problems than it solves. A man should be able to sign up he doesn't want the child though and not be forced to pay. Althought it's still a bit of a slippery slope.
[–]Completehumangarbage2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I agree with this. If a man doesn't want to support a child, he should be able to opt out of doing so and lose all parental rights. The mother, knowing the decision made by the father and whether they'll have his financial support or not then decides whether or not to have the baby.
[–]iminsecureandannoyin1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s really stupid. We don’t need more single moms in this world. Abortions are a good thing in a way. And trust me, them having to go through an abortion will probably be enough that they keep their legs closed or get on birth control because it’s apparently a painful and traumatizing process.
[–]Red_pilledman3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Gynocentrism.
[–]canadianholler2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Op do you think a man should have to pay if it his?
[–]hrm08942 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This post just made me anti-abortion. Single mothers should serve as an example to all future men looking for a relationship that the mother makes terrible decisions (sleeping around). Fuck these hoes. Sucks for the kid, though, but I'd rather live with a shit life than not live at all.
I do still think abortion should be legal for niche cases, such as rape.
[–]VeniVidiDementi2 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If the kid keeps going to post-secondary, it's 23 years, not 18. :S
[–]thecorgisleeps0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honestly i think people who get abortions should be forced to become infirtle, where they can't have any babies And ban them from any adoption agencies.
If a woman is stupid enough to kill a baby for her own selfish desires she doesn't deserve to raise another one.
And the father deserves a say in abortion as well
[–]reaper5551 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Go see a hooker at least the appreciate the money
[–]Haywood_Jablomie421 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This. Remember, when women say "Her body, her choice" what they really mean is "Her body, her choice, his wallet".
[–]pwtfab1231 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is so correct ,fucking con artist to trick you into 18 yrs of your money the games is fucking rigged fuckers..
[–]ContreversialViews22-1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
best way to sort this problem out is by taking away women's rights
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Infinitewisdom198478 points79 points80 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarzMonkey25 points26 points27 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (11 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]MarzMonkey14 points15 points16 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vlad_the_imp_hailer21 points22 points23 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Haywood_Jablomie426 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Abdulilah2 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]DarthSchadenfreude3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]DarthSchadenfreude0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SpiderKnife1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rfoconnor1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]SJHammer0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]SJHammer0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]MarzMonkey1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Haywood_Jablomie420 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoeBender1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoeBender1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConstantChinner32 points33 points34 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scriptx118 points19 points20 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]flee_market23 points24 points25 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Magnar964 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DEVOmay974 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThanatopsisRex2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Farhandlir19 points20 points21 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]CrackingYs 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TakuanNoho 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Farhandlir5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]genericusername1231 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]CardboardJesusWoW 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]peacejudah 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JohnPerera6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ConfidentHoverhander6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Completehumangarbage2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]iminsecureandannoyin1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Red_pilledman3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]canadianholler2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hrm08942 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VeniVidiDementi2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thecorgisleeps0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reaper5551 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Haywood_Jablomie421 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pwtfab1231 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ContreversialViews22-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link