In the last several months alone, multiple controversies involving academic censorship have emerged. Earlier this year, a paper by Theodore Hill, a professor emeritus of mathematics at the Georgia Institute of Technology, wrote about the “greater male variability hypothesis,” which posits that men are more variable than women along a number of traits, including intelligence, translating to a greater number of men at the high and low extremes.
After the paper was accepted in one journal and subsequently rescinded due to feminist scholars’ fears that it would be used to justify sexism, Dr. Hill got the paper published in another journal online, only to have it disappear from its website shortly thereafter. He was told the decision was not due to the paper’s scientific methods but its political implications.
In August, another controversy erupted when PLOS ONE published a study by physician Lisa Littman. She wrote about rapid-onset gender dysphoria, a growing phenomenon of girls who, out of the blue, announce they are transgender. Due to backlash from transgender activists, Brown University pulled the study’s corresponding press release, and PLOS ONE said the study had been placed under review. Considering that it underwent peer review prior to being published and other experts in the field would have scrutinized it for its methodology and content, the decision was unheard of.
With academics avoiding entire areas of research as a result, knowledge currently being produced is constrained, replaced by beliefs that are pleasant-sounding but biased, or downright nonsensical. The recent “grievance studies” investigation, led by academics Peter Boghossian, James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose, laid bare how bad the problem has become. The trio managed to get seven fake papers – ranging from topics like rape culture in dog parks to straight men using phallic sex toys to increase their feminist attitudes – accepted in high-ranking humanities journals.
[–]Docbear6439 points40 points41 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot23 points24 points25 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
I disagree with that, there's probably a few obviously but the vast majority don't. I can also find and point to people justifying all manner of things in the name of religion. That doesn't mean being religious causes them though.
If anything I'm worried that the only reason you think all sorts of things aren't happening is because people are scared of religious punishment.
[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RecQuery0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]DanThe__Man0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RecQuery1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DanThe__Man0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Ignoring you reducing this to the absurd. How exactly do you know that cavemen weren't spiritual or religious? There's a lot of evidence they were, cave paintings, idols, ritual cutting, ritual burial, etc.
Ignoring the fact that women are far more religious than men. I can come up with some ridiculous religious examples of bad behaviour and will if you insist, but what's the point.
I don't care if someone is religious or spiritual -- with the exception of religions that actively preach violence or are practiced via violence -- be either or both of those. Just leave me alone to do my thing, don't try to restrict what others can do -- censorship, etc -- and don't try to shove your religion on people who don't want it and don't come up with disingenuous arguments to try and pull people on to your own plantation.
[–]DanThe__Man0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RecQuery2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sleepyshaver4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MuchIndependence[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarthSchadenfreude0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]crshdurmomlstngt-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blissbynature13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CcyCV5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]OkPhilosophy1 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HC_ButtCex1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SwoopDaWooo1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RocknR0IIa1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]The_Frag_Man0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link