Hello there fellow brothers
I've seen many claims which state that men "age like whine" while women "age like milk" all my life. Not only have I heard this saying in the Manosphere but just in my general everyday life.
These sayings sound asnine but they are always reoccuring and through anecdotal experience I believe that they are true, just not in the way we think they are true.
You see, both men and women age and regardless of gender, looks after aging depends on a lot of lifestyle choices such as if one drinked/smoked alot, quality of sleep over the years and diet.
However, it is well known that a womans look is how most people determine her sexual market value; where as men can be judged on his looks but it's more of a mixture of his looks + social & financial status. These statements can be proven scientifically actually. To add to these statements though, through my obersvations, it seems a man can lack in 2 of these categories while having an abundance in 1 of them and still be deemed attractive.
What this means is that both men and women age "the same" (for the most part, there are exceptions) but when a woman ages it is more "devistating" because that was (typically) all her sexual market value where as what a man lacked in looks, he can make up with social and financial status.
Please let me know your guys' thoughts and opinions.
[–]gtowerthrowaway16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jadlkfjlakdsf2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GimmeYourJuices2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gtowerthrowaway2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nzt342 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kriskros180 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GimmeYourJuices0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]strongandhappy0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link