~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
ikhwan_arif
[–]ILoveJuices 115 points116 points117 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
It's truly sick that women try to isolate their sons from male influence.
[–]BigMawsmidget 40 points41 points42 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
All because they're bitter that they played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
Edit: word
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which will only increase now that traditional males are 'toxic'.
[–]coffeecup1988 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They are bitter that fathers are much better in raising children :)
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's right. And because of that, the sons go into crime. This man just saved his nephews from a lifetime of mistakes to a lifetime of potential success.
[–]aquaticscrotum6982 points83 points84 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It takes a man to raise a boy to be a man.
[–]Vrabo 46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women raise boys and men raise men.
[–]thxnwy29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Or a girl to be a woman.
Girls without father in the household on average start puberty earlier, more likely to be promiscuous, get pregnant in their early teens, etc. Fathers have a very important and positive influence on teenagers, boys or girls.
Truth!
[–]ssbmrai2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I was raised by the internet.
[–]tdh79245 points46 points47 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
It's clear than men's involvement makes the difference in society. Women don't have the mental capacity to understand that. If they would, we would see them on the streets cheering for men but instead they are protesting against them. The EXACT OPPOSITE of what they should be doing.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Spot on!
[–]7striker19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Amen to that
[–]saltycaramel-18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I get the same reaction from my nieces and nephews, they call me first. Don't listen to these guys calling you names. What you do for those kids is having a huge impact.
[–]-Radical_Edward15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What you did for these boys is commendable. They will never forget it, trust me. In the comment section they say that you are saving chad's children and permitting hypergamy of women. They are right but they are shortsighted and salty. What they forget is that soy boys are the principal cause of the matriarchy. By saving these boys and allowing them to turn into real men you weakened the matriarchy by denying them a soldier.
Good job, hope you get to have children of your own.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The point is not to be financially responsible for Chad's kid. Teaching random boys to be men is honorable. Paying for kids that aren't yours is dishonorable to yourself
Respect yourself, then other's will respect you. Don't marry a stepmom, don't marry at all.
[–]69odin4207 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Good job helping out family. This is in no way similar to getting cucked
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The guy did right by himself and his nephews.
[–]Motorola_Nova5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I can't help but feel these guys are still simping for their petulant sisters.
[–]Blissbynature23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's helping a kid get some male influence he needs and otherwise wouldn't get. That's a good thing.
[–]Sir_manalot13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They are.
If they didn't, the issues would stop.
The biggest issue with men today is the fact that we are swooping in to save Chad's spawn and remove responsibility from single mothers by saving her child.
This ultimately rewards and creates more single mothers and helps create more Chads (since they ultimately win and all the people helping single mothers lose).
We understand that single motherhood is a problem, but men just accept single motherhood as okay in the end. Probable because biology wants us to support Chad's spawn and create more Chads.
We would rather try to save Chad's spawn then stop single-motherhood really.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
It's not simping. He's not helping his sisters, he's helping his nephews. BIG DIFFERENCE. He's not paying for other's kids, he's teaching and mentoring boys on how to succeed in life. This is allowed and encouraged in MGTOW.
[–]Motorola_Nova-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm not sure that it is encouraged in MGTOW. I think that what you're describing is more on the traditional conservative side of things. "He should do the right thing." etc. How does the individual man benefit from spending his time and resources on a child that he has no biological investment in?
What is happening in the original post is that men are absorbing the negative impact that a women's' catastrophic choices have on the offspring she produces. From his intervention, the child benefits, the mother benefits, chad benefits, the state benefits <by not having to pick up the bill>, the man doesn't. He might get some satisfaction in knowing that he has been a positive force in the situation, but this is what men are conditioned to feel from a lifetime of gynocentric indoctrination. MGTOW is about breaking those chains.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Alright, you make a decent argument there.
Here's my argument. This man helped these boys by mentoring them to become successful. By doing so, he saved his nephews from getting into gangs and crime. I'm sure this man also red pilled his nephews with MGTOW philosophy and since he already has a good rapport with them, the nephews trust and believe that the Uncle has to say. In the long run, he also benefit from having contacts in various fields of industry that his nephews have entered. It's a win win for everyone.
Now, this man can choose to not help his nephews, sure. That's fine too. But nowhere does it say in MGTOW that, "Thou shalt not help boys from single mothers."
Again, no money was spent on the nephews (as far as I know). It's just mentoring, and guiding them to the right direction. Isn't that what we are doing here in this subreddit? Isn't this what MGTOW Youtubers are doing on Youtube? Isn't it better if we can avoid these nephews from being divorced-raped?
Yes it is.
[–]selfism_mike6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
So the beta uncle, excluded from breeding himself, gets to take care of chad's babies promoting exploitatory reproductive strategies.
This is not MGTOW, this is enabling lousy people to reproduce successfully. Pure simping.
[–]Sir_Koopaman4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm pretty sure beta vs chad doesn't apply when it comes to your relatives
[–]selfism_mike-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, it does. You are good enough to take care of the children of your siblings but not good enough to have your own. Where is the father in op's example?
My problem with this post is the virtue signalling and claiming taking care of other people's children (= responsibilities) is MGTOW. Do what you want but don't sell your ideals on how things should be as MGTOW.
[–]Brad-Chadblood2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Negative outlook. I’m an uncle and I love my nephew and nieces but seeing all the work my sister and brother in law have to deal with to raise them makes me not want to have my own kids. Being an uncle doesn’t make you a “beta, enabler, or a simp”
All I’m saying is let the guy be an uncle without labeling him a little bitch boy.
[–]selfism_mike1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And I am saying don't put on every stuff some guy is doing somewhere the MGTOW label. Taking care of your closer or extended family doesn't imply MGTOW. And virtue signalling how great of an uncle you are might be interpreted as a call back to the plantation. Again: has nothing to do with MGTOW.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
He's not paying for kids that aren't his. He's teaching boys how to be men. This is honorable. You can do that in MGTOW. You can help other men to help themselves to succeed. That is MGTOW
[–]selfism_mike0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
He is paying with his time. And forget about this "honorable" bullshit. "Honorable" drives men into wars, makes them marry useless women and is used to shame men into all possible types of constraints.
You can help other men to help themselves to succeed. That is MGTOW.
No, it is not! Going your own way does not imply being "honorable" or helping others. It just means to go your own way. What is this with people to get carried away into some pseudo-religious realm as soon as they found something they agree with? Over generalization and fanatism. If all of that is your way, then fine, but don't bully others to accept this as some guidance for them.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What do you think this entire subreddit is for? It's for helping other men helping themselves.
Now you can choose not to help other men, sure. But that doesn't mean that you can't help other men by teaching them about life and the real world.
There's nowhere in MGTOW that says you can't help boys - whether from a single mom, or from a 2 parent family - to achieve success.
[–]VitalMixofNutrients0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You can always adopt, and thats what the uncle did.
Celebrating taking care of other peoples kids as what a MGHOW should be doing is again plantation populating virtue signaling. MGTOW is not a religion to make the world a better place. If you want to be nice, be nice, but don't present this as a general recipe for going your own way.
[–]grumetito2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Humans are the only animal that speak, coock and males are ubti education of childs. It is fir a reason.
[–]NotLuceBree2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I saw this comment, I believe it's on one of Coach Greg Adams' videos.
People should check out his channel, he puts out great stuff on a consistent basis.
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It was actually taken on TFM's channel. But I subbed to Greg as well.
[–]NotLuceBree1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I stand corrected!
[–]NewLifex0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This sentence hit home so hard.
"Many of us MGTOW are childless brothers to single mothers"
My exact situation. I love my sister to death but she's had her fun and is now paying the price. She's dated every one from Pilots to Military men to an engineer from Garmin. I've seen her go through guys like they're going out of style.
She is now a single mom and has to work. Suddenly she has to work to support her kid. It's nice to see the realization that money doesn't grow on trees and it has value now.
I say it over and over, the piper always gets paid. Every thing has a price. I've seen this come full circle after this happening with my sister for the last 14 years. So for the dudes who haven't seen it first hand, it will happen. Your "princess" will eventually be called upon to pay her dues. It always comes.
[–]jp_mra0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
BLM is dedicated to destroying the family unit. Says so right on their webpage. https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/what-we-believe/
"We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered...We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work 'double shifts' so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work...We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and 'villages' that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."
I would like to add that they modified their wording from the original, it used to say something like 'children should be raised by villages of women' and that 'the black community must be led by the lesbian and trans community.'
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]ILoveJuices 115 points116 points117 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigMawsmidget 40 points41 points42 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]coffeecup1988 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aquaticscrotum6982 points83 points84 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vrabo 46 points47 points48 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thxnwy29 points30 points31 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ssbmrai2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tdh79245 points46 points47 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]7striker19 points20 points21 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]saltycaramel-18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Radical_Edward15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]69odin4207 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Motorola_Nova5 points6 points7 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blissbynature23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Motorola_Nova-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]selfism_mike6 points7 points8 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_Koopaman4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]selfism_mike-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Brad-Chadblood2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]selfism_mike1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]selfism_mike0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]VitalMixofNutrients0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]selfism_mike1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]grumetito2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NotLuceBree2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikhwan_arif[S] 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NotLuceBree1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NewLifex0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jp_mra0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link