~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
ExplosivePumkin
[–]Rottinghere 119 points120 points121 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Weird. It almost seems as if there's an agenda at work here...
[–]nosafeword1000 34 points35 points36 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
It's 100% manipulation.
[–]AmazingAdminAnus 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Google is ABSOLUTELY manipulating search results to push an agenda, it is known, factual, definitely not a conspiracy. They're also tracking you everywhere.
I highly recommend that google users switch to DuckDuckGo for a search engine. Also the android DuckDuckGo web browser will block google's tracking. Seriously - google will track your private browsing on all browsers, they're incredibly invasive basically stalking your every move,. DuckDuckGo provides a massive "fuck you" to google.
[–]bfte2 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Isn't DDG pretty much the same? Try searching for "white couple" or "European history people".
[–]SnooDrawings4726 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also search for “white inventors”... I have no idea how people can’t recognize not only the agenda against men, but more specifically the agenda against straight, white, men... it’s so blatantly obvious it’s not even funny
[–]LFGoodgames 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
DDG is basically a gateway to Google. It uses Google's search engine API, with the only difference being that DDG's IP, DNS requests, fingerprint and cookies get tracked by Google instead. Not yours.
In reality, It's the same as if you would've set up a VPN, configured your browser to reject cookies in private browsing alongside with masking your useragent, canvas/audio/WebRtc fingerprint, disabled Java and 3rd party XSS and used DNS over HTTPS.
If Googling was a sexual act, DuckDuckGo would be a condom for your browsex. But one is better off mastering the art of universal safe browsing.
[–]Kram22598 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Womanipulation*
[–]RosemanButcher 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Including results for "magenta at work"
[–]Curious_Oogway 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I can confirm, it really happened. What a crap!
DuckDuckGo gave a fair result.
[–]ahmadswalihck 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's more about making money than an agenda. Do you think the average man would be interested in reading "Men-led Businesses are more profitable than those..."
[–]MGTOWayoflife 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A whistle blower already exposed Google. His name was Zach Bothies.
https://youtu.be/g1VeElBAeas
[–]SufferableKant 67 points68 points69 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Greetings, Citizen.
It has come to our attention that you have been attempting to discover and consume harmful and or problematic materials which have not yet been reviewed and sanitised for general public consumption.
An Equality and Diversity Enforcement Squad has been dispatched to your location to assist you in attending your Re-Education Session, which we have automatically booked for your convenience.
As this is your first offence, we are offering you an exclusive time-limited 10% discount token off the call-out fee, the transportation costs, classroom cost, Covid-19 hygiene costs, textbook materials, administration costs, and repatriation taxes. Your voucher will be activated once redeemed via an exchange of Social Credit History points.
Remember, we are all in this together. Let us help you by providing guidance as to the correct thoughts to hold, for Justice, Truth, and The Greater Good.
[–]breakingthebarriers 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It will be this way soon unfortunately. Women have internalized this type of thinking already. Still, they’ll just use it as a vetting mechanism and only be attracted to the men that engage in “wrongthink” and don’t follow along. Women won’t even need to go to court when they’re ready to monkey-branch. They’ll simply report his “wrongthink” and move on.
[–]nosafeword1000 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women have internalized this type of thinking already.
Yeah, I hear a lot of "stick it to men" attitude. I don't mind a bit of joking around but what's being said by women these days is dead cold.
If you're not chad or tyrone any sort of confidence you exhibit may be taken as aGgReSsIoN.
[–]U-94 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
We have always been at war with East Asia.
[–]anongogogo 37 points38 points39 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women led companies are better for employees.
How is this any good when they can metoo you AHAHAHAHAH Fuck goocuck and their pussy worship. They're just a brainwashing machine.
[–]Ody_ssey 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Companies with majority female staff don't make progress.
[–]SiliconeGiant 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They do go through a tremendous amount of tissue though.
[–]Ody_ssey 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Like as?
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
almost like if corporate media is biased and manipulate the results...
[–]roflcopt0rz_returns 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck goolag.
[–]egieasemota 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not surprised. I was writing a short report on Native American history and was searching for the wars they fought amongst their tribes. e.g Comanche vs Shawnee. On google, it only showed The genocide of Native Americans by Americans. I had to to use DuckDuckGo for it.
[–]lestrxb 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I just searched the same thing to see for myself, and even after clicking "show results for men-led businesses only", it still shows all the women results. Wow.
[–]SnooDrawings4726 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Now do yourself a favor and search for “white couples” “white inventors” etc... it’s so blatantly obvious
[–]ubeogesh 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I had some doubt about "men-led business" because this kind of phrase is most likely used when they compare it to the women-led business so it makes sense results are inclusive.
But this has no reason...
[–]ffyouredditffyou 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's the agenda my friend.
[–]Atesz763 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Google is sexist confirmed
[–]SilentQ2 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Click "search only for men-led businesses"
Same results.
[–]badaboomxx 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That is why I do not use google for searches
[–]GynocentrismCanSMA 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm getting there.
It's been a long time since it was any good.
[–]NameGiver0 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy fuck this is real. If you click the link that confirms you meant “men led” it still shows you women-led results. And if you add “-women” it still shows women-led results.
Use DuckDuckGo.
[–]CensorshipForLosers 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you identify as a woman, is your business then women-led?
[–]lord_of_memezz 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I use DuckDuckGo.com for all my searching, never have an issue
[–]MGTOWayoflife 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
When you search for white businesses guess what you get?
[–]flowingwisdom12 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
😂😂 what did you expect from Google?
[–]GynocentrismCanSMA 12 points13 points14 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
To give the results for the fucking words I type in?
[–]Legs2Big_0 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They don’t even hire or keep people, who have proven their competency, with different viewpoints in their company. They’re beyond done.
[–]alienmuseum 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
If they're so great at doing business, then why not start their own business and CRUSH those male-dominated industries? CRUSH the patriarchy with your own raw talents and business know-how, ladies! Do it!
Or maybe they can't and that's why they try to get politicians to pass law to force men to let them into their companies.
[–]SnooDrawings4726 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because women aren’t capable of making decisions... they don’t even know what they want to eat on a daily basis, let alone making complex risky business decisions for a billion dollar company
[–]DeathtotheCavalry 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
including results for bankrupt businesses.
[–]migoloco 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
-intext:women-led
You're welcome.
[–]kimikokso157 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Gender equality"
[–]Roastots 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
I am pretty sure this is a joke but some comments have me wondering.
It's the same with words like man-whore, male teacher, male nurse, etc. Since our schema for businesspeople is men, we only differentiate businesses by sex when they are ran by women? Kinda obvious, right, but I forgot the name of this kind of word and threw out the source book, if anyone can help me out...
That being said, yeah, corporations are just being fucking manipulative in their support for human rights. Grosses me out.
[–]Curious_Oogway 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not really, all the alternate word you suggested, gave me the relevant results on google, except for the men-lead business.
[–]NameGiver0 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It’s not a joke... I mean clown world and all but it’s not a joke.
[–]Roastots 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Ok then the conclusion isnt really thought-out? Men-led business is not a word. Implicitly gendered nouns (whatever they call them) say more about condoned gender roles than anything. I mean, I could be wrong, but yeah. Also where did you two get the same idea? How can we criticize feminists for having offense-tinted glasses when we post this shit (sorry)?
Do businessmen need a a special space? Do they wanna coin this phrase because they are "so invisible," inaccessible to aspiring young men? Are they jelly of minorities for how easy they can be considered different just by attaining some power? Wut.
[–]SnooDrawings4726 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Search for “white inventors” you’ll see for yourself it’s not a joke... there’s an orchestrated agenda against men, but more specifically, straight white men
[–]Legs2Big_0 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I use Google’s search bar as a last resort at work. I’ll have you know that the search results have been tampered with on every search service to promote that womanist horseshite, though. 🖐🤖
[–]logicAndFury 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Use duck duck go or other privacy focused search engines.
I use this now. It's not perfect but it's better than Google.
[–]yourcarlosdanger 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Man the harpoons
[–]iuyt432 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Great now I know which businesses to hate
this shit is real
btw if I click "search only for men-led businesses" in it, the results are the same!
[–]Arcansis 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What’s most fucked about this is that it automatically includes results for women led businesses, and when you click on search only for men-led businesses the search results don’t change much.
[–]ShinichiHaku2 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Search for wahman businesses Blacklist anything there on the basis of incompetence and mismanagement Begin screening the rest individually
Search for wahman businesses
Blacklist anything there on the basis of incompetence and mismanagement
Begin screening the rest individually
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Rottinghere 119 points120 points121 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]nosafeword1000 34 points35 points36 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]AmazingAdminAnus 24 points25 points26 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]bfte2 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SnooDrawings4726 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LFGoodgames 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kram22598 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RosemanButcher 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Curious_Oogway 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ahmadswalihck 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOWayoflife 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SufferableKant 67 points68 points69 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]breakingthebarriers 12 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]nosafeword1000 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]U-94 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anongogogo 37 points38 points39 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ody_ssey 26 points27 points28 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SiliconeGiant 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Ody_ssey 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]roflcopt0rz_returns 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]egieasemota 18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lestrxb 14 points15 points16 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SnooDrawings4726 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ubeogesh 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ffyouredditffyou 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Atesz763 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SilentQ2 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]badaboomxx 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GynocentrismCanSMA 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NameGiver0 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CensorshipForLosers 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]lord_of_memezz 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOWayoflife 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]flowingwisdom12 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]GynocentrismCanSMA 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Legs2Big_0 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]alienmuseum 4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SnooDrawings4726 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DeathtotheCavalry 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]migoloco 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kimikokso157 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Roastots 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Curious_Oogway 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NameGiver0 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Roastots 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SnooDrawings4726 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Legs2Big_0 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]logicAndFury 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MGTOWayoflife 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]yourcarlosdanger 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]iuyt432 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ubeogesh 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arcansis 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ShinichiHaku2 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link