The second paragraph

RareForevernk · 2018-03-08T21:43:55+00:00

Tacit - understood or implied without being stated.

fly__away__ · 2018-03-08T22:12:05+00:00

I sat down in the barbershop and the guy just totally cut my hair!!!....!!!!...he just assumed that I “wanted it”. I have exposed him on twitter and Facebook and am suing him for his business. Yes means yes#METOO

SuspectedLumber · 2018-03-08T22:01:25+00:00

That's such bullshit... Every time I go into a barber shop to sit down and just tie my shoe laces and sit for a while, some idiot always starts cutting my hair and shaving me :(

crshdurmomlstngt · 2018-03-09T02:39:32+00:00

get dressed up
put on make-up plaster
go to bar
pester men into free drinks
beer goggles on, time to pick a lay
spent an hour grinding her ass on his dick on the dancefloor
go drunkingly shoulder to shoulder home with this dude
get fucked raw

2 days later, regret all these actions as the guy turned out to be uglier then expected, claim she was raped. The courts issue a verdict that she was raped. Guy goes to prison for 10 years.

AppreciateYa · 2018-03-08T23:24:02+00:00

[deleted]

Goateeki · 2018-03-08T23:26:14+00:00

Just so everyone is aware, consent as it is described here is not consent as the term is used in criminal law.

klim_milk · 2018-03-09T01:03:41+00:00

See, this is why I shave my own head. They just don't get muh consent.

Tassob · 2018-03-09T12:44:01+00:00

CONSENT: Requires a sound mind, critical thinking and reasoning. Good fucking luck fining ANY of those qualities in that thing you are thinking about sticking your dick in.

Blacks Law (5th)

CONSENT. A concurrence of wills. Voluntarily yielding the will to the proposition of another; acquiescence or compliance therewith. Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co., D.C.Minn., 26 F.Supp. 366, 371. Agreement; the act or result of coming into harmony or accord. Glantz v. Gabel, 66 Mont. 134, 212 P. 858, 860.

Consent is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing as in a balance the good or evil on each side. 1 Story, Eq.Jur. § 222; Lervick v. White Top Cabs, La.App., 10 So.2d 67, 73. It means voluntary agreement by a person in the possession and exercise of sufficient mentality to make an intelligent choice to do something proposed by another. People v. Kangiesser, 44 Cal. App. 345, 186 P. 388, 389. It supposes a physical power to act, a moral power of acting, and a serious, determined, and free use of these powers. Fonblanque, Eq. b. 1, c. 2, s. 1; New Jersey Mfrs' Casualty Ins. Co., 148 A. 790, 791, 106 N.J.L. 238. Consent is implied in every agreement. It is an act unclouded by fraud, duress, or sometimes even mistake. Heine v. Wright, 76 Cal.App. 338, 244 P. 955, 956.

There is a difference between consenting and submitting. Every consent involves a submission; but a mere submission does not necessarily involve consent. 9 Car. & P. 722.

"Consent" is an active acquiescence as distinguished from "assent," meaning a silent acquiescence. People v. Lowe, 205 N.Y.S. 77, 78, 209 App.Div. 498. "Consent" means an active circumstance of concurrence; "assent" is a passive act of concurrence before another does the act charged. Perryman v. State, 63 Ga.App. 819, 12 S.E.2d 388, 390. But the two terms may be used interchangeably. Bartlett v. Sundin, 169 N.Y.S. 391, 393, 182 App.Div. 117.

"Consent" is sometimes synonymous merely with "waiver." Dahlquist v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 52 Utah, 438, 174 P. 833, 844. See, also, Seegmiller v. Day, C.C.A.Ill., 249 F. 177, 178; Toledo Fence & Post Co. v. Lyons, C.C.A.Ohio, 290 F. 637, 640.

As used in the law of rape "consent" means consent of the will, and submission under the influence of fear or terror cannot amount to real consent. Hallmark v. State, 22 Okl. Cr. 422, 212 P. 322, 328. There must be an exercise of intelligence based on knowledge of its significance and moral quality and there must be a choice between resistance and assent. State v. Schwab, 109 Ohio St. 532, 143 N. E. 29, 31. And if woman resists to the point where further resistance would be useless or until her resistance is overcome by force or violence, submission thereafter is not "consent". People v. Mcllvain, 130 P.2d 131, 135, 55 Cal. App.2d 322.

ArtoriusXv · 2018-03-09T13:53:09+00:00

Bloody crazy world we live in. All I did was sit down on the loo with my pants down and I just started shitting! All on it's own, I was shite raped by my own arse! I demand reparations from... white guys and other guys! Let me not have to take actual responsibility!!!

crshdurmomlstngt · 2018-03-09T17:13:36+00:00

Reeeeeeee!!!!

"Yes, yes, dear. There is no way to avoid what happened after the fact, because now you woulr prefer to benefit from it.

You see, this here is a word, and it means something important, as far as the law is concerned."

In a fair world, this is a totally viable defence. Sucks that the world isn't fair...

The second paragraph

Comments

woah is this a new thing or wat

very ##confused

Title	The second paragraph
Author	jamesbond8181
Upvotes	194
Comments	23
Date	March 8, 2018 9:41 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/8319po/the_second_paragraph/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/the-second-paragraph.583985 https://theredarchive.com/post/583985