TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Apparently climate change also discriminates based on gender.

BamYDK

February 9, 2018
19 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/lcp2gu3d58f01.jpg
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Apparently climate change also discriminates based on gender.
Author

BamYDK

Upvotes 19
Comments 12
Date February 9, 2018 5:44 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7wf59v/apparently_climate_change_also_discriminates/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/apparently-climate-change-also-discriminates-based.906242
https://theredarchive.com/post/906242

Comments

[–]Fortspucking 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism is always looking for new areas to set up shop.

[–]Lethn 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Look at the fucking posers, bet you they'll all start screeching they're getting sent death threats when people call them idiots for trying to turn climate change into a gender issue, they may put on tough poses for the photographs but they always resort to playing the victim when they get confronted.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Global warming was recognised as containing gender issues twenty years ago IIRC. You could check the latest IPCC assessment report for the consensus view. It is typically 5 years out of date but it is a very conservative process that creates it so it is useful for an idea of a baseline that all governments can accept.

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a 'gender issue' and then there's what feminists do where they deliberately try to make it out that women are exclusively the victims of anything and then proceed to shut out any talk of men affected by it.

You see this frequently in issues like domestic violence and rape, the constant mantra of feminists and people who support them is "Yes but statistics show women suffer the majority of violence". Does that justify shutting out men? No, it doesn't, not if you care about gender equality.

This kind of thing is purely the purview of bitter and angry rich white women looking to take out their bad experiences with men on the whole gender, which is ironic because that's what they always accuse their critics of, nothing more than self-projection on their part.

[–]darkrae 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tax is discriminatory. How can the government charge men and women the same tax rate if women earn less than men! /s

[–]KingRobotPrince 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's a few vague connections like women having to collect firewood in some developing countries and climate change meaning they have to walk further to get it which puts them in danger.

But these women are just using the plight of others to further their own cause.

[–]dontpet 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women do the bulk of consumer spending. While that is for the household it is also for other goods. Last time I saw this discussed I found out that women decide the bulk of the car purchases as well.

I haven't seen research about this issue but I'm pretty confident it is mostly women that decide the house need a new kitchen. And that we need a trip overseas for the holidays.

They built in gender parity to the Paris accord for carbon emission reductions. That was only in relation to getting more women into green energy roles because.... Diversity!

[–]tehfrog7292 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh man these people are garbage.

[–]JebberJabber -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

What a weird post. How could global warming not be gendered in its effects?

I have no idea which sex will be more affected but I'm glad to know people are planning ahead for it. They were already starting to think about it 20 years ago when I last followed global climate science.

Most people's activities are gendered, and some of those activities are much more affected by global warming than others.

If we ever decide to move on from our head-in-the-sand / "you first" strategy and actually do anything about global warming, those actions will also have gender differences in their effects too. And of course both sexes would claim to be disproportionately disadvantaged, and that supposed imbalance would occupy 90% of their minds.

The context of the picture has not been mentioned. UCL is University College of London, one of the worlds top universities. For the sort of people planning to spend their life wrestling with the many facets of this global catastrophe UCL is the sort of place they would train.
Recognising their need for networking and that their freedom to speak will later be limited at times*, they might well form a group called Students for Global Health and release some tweets like this.

*The extraordinary current level of censorship of government agencies being applied in the US might not be the pattern for the future, but it is nowhere near the farthest the pendulum can swing. I think HUD is still being allowed to set building standards to take account of the thermal expansion component of sea level rise, but only so long as they use blatant lies to hide the truth of what they are doing. I think they have to pass it off as "increased margin of safety". I didn't look into the details, it is too depressing.

[+]BamYDK1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

I stopped reading your post at ‘how can global warming not be gendered in its effects’.

It is an issue that affects every single being on this planet, regardless of gender. It is NOT a gender-specific issue, it’s a problem that requires cohesion, not segregation based upon genitalia.

Sure, it might affect genders in slightly different ways, but that pales in significance to the macro issue. The whole concept is utterly ridiculous, and is yet another example of feminism encroaching into areas where it is not relevant or needed.

[–]JebberJabber -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you read more you could base your opinions on reality not supposition.

You could learn whether anyone is suggesting segregation, and if not, what they are suggesting.
You could learn whether consideration of differential effects is being driven by a feminist agenda of interfering, empire-building, attention grabbing. Or is it just experts in the fields involved in adaptation doing what they do, working through the details so we can have predictions and plans? Who knows? Not you.

Tip: "I stopped reading at" will stop many people from bothering to reply to you. I guess a lot won't bother to read your comment either.

[–]BamYDK1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The cover photo for the event tells me all I need to know about ‘segregation’ and the agenda of it. A feminist will argue anything and you are the perfect example of said delusion I’m afraid.

Thanks for the tip. Now here’s one for you: Stop wasting your time incessantly commenting on a men’s rights subreddit in order to peddle your divisive agenda. The walls of text you write serve only to waste your own time, no-one reads nor cares what’s within.

I’ll leave you with this entirely true fact. Did you know that rain detrimentally affects men more than women? Men tend to have shorter hair, meaning they absorb up to 64% more moisture into their scalp, which can lead to a whole array of issues. Please feel free to join my upcoming event to discuss the devastating implications.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter