~ archived since 2018 ~

Child Support: Ladies let's get together

MRMRising

December 17, 2012

10 upvotes

/r/MensRights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xujioA36T98

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Child Support: Ladies let's get together
Author	MRMRising
Upvotes	10
Comments	3
Date	December 17, 2012 10:51 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/150o2q/child_support_ladies_lets_get_together/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/child-support-ladies-lets-get-together.1006353 https://theredarchive.com/post/1006353

Comments

[–]oneiorosgrip 4 points5 points6 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's like she has actually met my husband's ex, who worked harder to maintain the ability to be supported by two men (her ex-husband and her next husband) than to make any effort to support herself, played games with visitation and tried to alienate the kids from him. She caused no end of heartache for everyone around her, and got nothing out of it but a chronic sense of adversarial confrontation. The only difference from what she's said is that he didn't leave her... she left him, and then started playing all those games.

I think one way which could be effective in reducing women's ability to do these things would be if, when there is a decision to be made by a government agency or in court regarding disputes on custody, money, or property, the deciding party would be legally barred from knowing the genders of the petitioners.

The petitioners could be represented by computerized voices (even just using an old Macintosh with the "speak" program on it) instead of showing up in court. Both parties would be given the same voice. All other evidence and testimony presented would have to be sanitized of gender-references related to the petitioners. When the judge, magistrate, or case worker would make a decision, it would have to be based on the concrete facts of the case, and not on gender.

[–]ANEPICLIE 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]oneiorosgrip 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link