New Study: Australia Rejects Circumcision as a Preventative for HIV

fondueguy · 2011-12-03T14:17:37+00:00

New Study

When the hell would we cut girls as a pathetic substitute for a condom anyways?

I wouldn't care even if it did provide a small protection. The fact that we consider it for boys is disturbing.

the_raptor · 2011-12-03T08:11:53+00:00

Finally. I was getting sick of the pro-circumcision brigade (which contained a high proportion of women) using the minor preventative effect shown in those studies to back mass circumcision.

There other favourite argument was that circumcised men would be less sensitive and so therefore would last longer during sex. Which was blown out of the water by a study which said circumcised men had rougher sex to achieve the same level of stimulation as un-circumcised men, and that women preferred the less rough sex.

julian88888888 · 2011-12-03T03:29:35+00:00

holy crap that was an intimating amount of text. Can anyone give me a brief summary, other than the headline?

TL:DR

tl:dr

Title	New Study: Australia Rejects Circumcision as a Preventative for HIV
Author	memymineown
Upvotes	55
Comments	9
Date	December 2, 2011 11:51 PM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/my58o/new_study_australia_rejects_circumcision_as_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/new-study-australia-rejects-circumcision-as-a.1031041 https://theredarchive.com/post/1031041

Comments