When somebody tells you not not denote persons of characteristic c by name n, what has really happened is that cs have come to be seen as bad or deplorable or ridiculous, or generally capable of attracting opprobrium.

It is thought, wrongly, that by giving cs a new name, n1, say, they will no longer attract the opprobrium attached to n. This is true initially, but only initially. In the fullness of time, the opprobrium directed towards cs comes to attach to n1. It is therefore necessary to scorn all those using n1 as instruments of the dark forces of all that is evil, predatory, inhuman, and inimical to peace, justice and tranquility.

Instead, we must now denote cs with new name n2. And so the cycle begins again. To break it, we need to remove the opprobrium from what is denoted. No amount of re-notation will change what is denoted, or ultimately, what value is attached to it.

What does this have to do with anything? I'll leave that as an exercise for the thoughtful.