Just out of curiosity, what stops the court to enforce a polygraph test for both the victim and the charged? Surely it shouldn't cost too much for a state to precede with such implementations? Regardless, in the case of false accusation, a lie, the so apparent "victim" on top of his/hers newly found false accusation charges, could be asked to pay the polygraph fees, same goes for the person who is being charged, if the case happens to be true, but of course, the state can pay for it all together regardless. I am not saying that polygraph tests will have a 100% accuracy, however I believe a good case can be made for them providing the higher chance and a possibility of truth. Should the government be lobbied to consider such a bill turned into a legislative statute law? I believe it could save a lot of time for false accusations, if DNA tests were not to be a possibility (due to time constraints), and many women will think twice before filing lawsuits, even if they did have sex but then later just "regret" it. When asked on a polygraph whether they thought they were raped, could paint a very different picture to that of what they and their attorney tries to do with convincing the courts. On top of that, it will really help the real rape victims, be it men or women.