Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]datatroves 3 points4 points5 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]wallerdog 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]datatroves 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]datatroves 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]datatroves 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]-Baljeet-Tjinder-2 points [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link
What does this actually prove?
What feminist talking point is the unreliable 2006 study showing?
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 1 point2 points3 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[+]-Baljeet-Tjinder-1 points [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link
2006 forensics are notoriously unreliable, merely the time it was conducted isn’t the focus, it’s what’s being studied and the science at the time ect
And I’m still not really understanding the study, why was this talking point a thing in the first place? The study basically just shows that people like rough consensual sex idg what it achieves
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+]-Baljeet-Tjinder-1 points [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link
But why bring up a study like that in a Men’s Right subreddit? All it does is prove couples like rough sex
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]-Baljeet-Tjinder-1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
Eh, still at a loss why you posted it here, what does rough sex have to do with men’s rights
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]-Baljeet-Tjinder-2 points [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link
And it found out that genital injuries were the same for both
Injuries that most likely come from... drum roll... rough sex
And still, what does it have to do with men’s rights, you’re avoiding the question
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] -2 points-1 points0 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blutarg 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]-Cyber_Renaissance[S,🍰] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link