I get it, a lot of women made accusations. He was only tried, however, for one allegation. It was “he said, she said.” The only evidence the prosecution had were other women from his past, which I find ridiculous since testimony about a woman’s past are actually illegal (re: claims of slut shaming). Additionally, a co-worker of the accuser claimed she discussed fabricating accusations for financial gain. What are everyone’s thoughts? It may be controversial to extend any form of support to him, but justice should be blind to social pressures...