I think this article is biased towards women/mothers. https://zawn.substack.com/p/family-courts-and-child-custody-are "I know so many men who have fought for custody of their children. All of them have won at least joint custody. And in all cases, a strange thing happens after their win: They begin complaining that the custody system is biased—a system that worked to get them the outcome they wanted." This person must be a robot. Mothers always get the benefit of the doubt even when they are abusive while fathers lose. Here are my comments: "Do abusive mothers get custody more than men?" Statistically yes, most of the time "But I'm a mother and I still lost" Those are just some exceptions. They are everywhere. They don't change the overall statistics "I know many abusive fathers who won custody" Sexist courts do that too. They give abusive fathers the benefit of the doubt and mothers lose. But overall, fathers are biased against. Also, men may not do household stuff but they have to provide for the whole family. They have to pay for everything, the whole family, etc. Plus statistically, men work longer hours than women. This author is just trying to make fathers look bad. Also, this article also claims that "women are twice as likely to lose custody when they report abuse, even when the abuse is documented.". That's not true. When women report abuse, weather false or actual, they get believed but when a man does the same thing, they have to prove it. And this article says, "court law" is biased against women?". Seriously? What the hell is Zawn (the author) smoking? Whoever is defending the articles is disgusting