TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

jessi387 Archive

View 69 posts and 2,845 comments by jessi387 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1672

Healthjessi387/r/MensRights18/02/21 02:10 AM
1410

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights31/03/21 10:53 PM
646

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights03/04/25 10:24 PM
636

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights17/10/21 03:20 PM
268

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights10/04/24 06:00 AM
227

Healthjessi387/r/MensRights20/07/22 09:50 PM
216

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights06/08/22 06:47 PM
215

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights28/09/24 09:55 PM
213

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:08 PM
137

social issuesjessi387/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/23 12:09 AM
130

articlejessi387/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 12:33 PM
123

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:03 AM
119

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights27/02/24 07:14 AM
108

Legal Rightsjessi387/r/MensRights09/01/21 09:29 PM
99

Legal Rightsjessi387/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:38 PM
93

Activism/Supportjessi387/r/MensRights19/12/21 03:35 PM
85

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights28/09/23 09:01 PM
81

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights05/10/24 12:11 AM
78

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights20/09/21 04:17 PM
75

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights30/04/24 08:00 PM
74

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:41 AM
72

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights21/07/23 05:56 PM
72

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights28/07/21 10:05 PM
70

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights25/12/24 06:53 AM
67

Anti-MRMjessi387/r/MensRights09/09/25 05:46 PM
66

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:17 PM
61

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights03/10/23 10:08 PM
58

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:35 PM
56

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights31/12/25 07:52 PM
56

Activism/Supportjessi387/r/MensRights02/01/21 10:41 PM
52

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:41 PM
48

mental healthjessi387/r/MensRights19/07/24 12:17 AM
48

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:42 PM
46

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:55 AM
45

discussionjessi387/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/23 02:32 AM
44

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights24/05/24 01:07 AM
38

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights24/08/24 04:32 AM
35

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:41 PM
32

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights03/12/24 08:27 PM
31

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:31 PM
31

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights03/01/25 07:01 PM
30

Activism/Supportjessi387/r/MensRights12/02/21 12:48 PM
24

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights15/11/24 08:23 AM
23

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights01/06/22 06:40 PM
23

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights01/11/20 08:33 PM
20

Discussionjessi387/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 05:51 PM
19

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights27/09/21 12:27 AM
18

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:01 PM
17

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights11/05/22 05:16 PM
16

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights28/02/24 05:39 AM
13

Healthjessi387/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:20 PM
12

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights09/04/24 10:28 PM
12

mediajessi387/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/24 05:53 PM
10

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights09/07/24 12:35 AM
9

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights24/10/22 12:05 AM
9

Healthjessi387/r/MensRights04/01/23 10:25 PM
7

Legal Rightsjessi387/r/MensRights03/02/24 01:35 AM
7

Feminismjessi387/r/MensRights24/01/24 10:14 PM
5

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights23/09/22 01:44 AM
3

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights07/05/22 11:05 PM
2

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:19 PM
2

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:02 PM
1

discussionjessi387/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/12/22 10:02 PM
1

Social Issuesjessi387/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:44 PM
1

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights28/07/21 02:39 AM
1

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights04/04/21 03:09 AM
1

Edu./Occu.jessi387/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:37 AM
1

Discriminationjessi387/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:34 PM
0

Generaljessi387/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:08 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,845 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
17

It’s quite the opposite
/r/MensRights24/07/26 07:23 PM
51

If you’re willing to go down the rabbit hole, you’ll find there are a lot more presuppositions that you have that are also false. Work place discrimination, academic discrimination, unfair public policy, government spending, social stigmas, and the mother of them all….. family court.
/r/MensRights24/07/26 03:38 AM
4

Pretty reasonable take.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 02:05 AM
19

I disagree. If you want someone far ahead of their time, who is also a Progressive, look at Warren Farrell. Truly a pioneer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 09:41 PM
15

Are you familiar with the work of Warren Farrell ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 09:40 PM
12

Ya. Sadly I agree. I want to be clear, the approach to these issues should be bi-partisan. But people like reeves highlight the problems with the left trying to “help men”. They seem to ignore all the things they have done to create the current state of affairs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 09:35 PM
16

Thank you for taking the time to read. It’s important to recognize how even well meaning, but misguided efforts can miss the mark
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/26 08:01 PM
145

His OWN daughter…..
/r/MensRights18/07/26 09:23 PM
2

Good one am I right ?
/r/MensRights16/07/26 08:22 PM
18

A man who doesn’t grow up,take responsibility for his life, blames everyone else for his failures, gets mad at their lack of success with the opposite sex, probably can’t hold down a job without people picking up his slack, is really dependent on others…… so basically a woman.
/r/MensRights16/07/26 07:50 PM
22

What country are you from
/r/MensRights16/07/26 05:37 AM
33

Also consider the fact that males are over represented among the high iq elite. It’s not like those opportunities are forked over to random people evenly distributed among the population
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:33 PM
10

Were the managers female ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 03:48 PM
3

If you want what an actual patriarchy is, look up the work of Daniel Amneus. His book the garbage generation, and the case for father custody, are great examples https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=CfVkau\_NrmJHIyfV
/r/MensRights09/07/26 06:18 PM
18

In relative terms not absolute terms The competition pool they are playing in is far below even u15 boys. Remind me what they get payed again
/r/MensRights08/07/26 11:37 PM
99

Only a third ? Only some situations ?
/r/MensRights06/07/26 12:35 AM
7

You need to inform yourself a lot more about who those people are.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:45 AM
13

And the retaliation will only get worse.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 11:01 PM
127

And rather than addressing the social inequities that created this guy, we will see more “ policy to protect women “ which only birth more depraved individuals like this who feel marginalized and will lash out. The cycle continues
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:21 PM
6

Yuuuup
/r/MensRights22/06/26 12:36 AM
16

Completely disagree. Many of them know…. They just don’t care. It’s only when they realize they will inevitably suffer that they wake up. Just look at the convo around college enrolment. No one gave a shit, until they realized they aren’t enough men for women to marry.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:47 PM
1

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights21/06/26 02:29 PM
1

Read the misandry bubble, and its follow up .
/r/MensRights18/06/26 06:55 AM
3

Was this a book he wrote ?
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:13 PM
8

What book is this from
/r/MensRights15/06/26 07:05 PM
1

The suspense is killing me
/r/MensRights13/06/26 04:38 PM
25

Ya … that’s our problem. We don’t have women in our life….. gotchya
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 04:53 AM
2

I agree with everything you said. I was trying to clarify your stance so there was no ambiguous interpretation on my part. I agree that the system from top to bottom discriminates against boys and men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 09:00 PM
2

Okay. Fair definition. I’m also Canadian, and was watching to see how this turned out. When you say their focus was more on anti-feminism, than on men, can you elaborate on that ? Do you mean they are actually attempting to dismantle the impact feminism has had on our system? Or do you mean they treat anti-feminism with a cause for concern ? As if they are worrried about rising sentiments about anti-feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 08:19 PM
7

Can you define for me what you mean by anti-feminism in this context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/26 07:56 PM
2

*rob henderson*
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:31 PM
-4

Oh man, the dialogue around this subject is getting spicy 😋
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:41 PM
23

So ….. they should just not react ? They should just take it ?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:33 PM
0

So you do believe in the idea of a chaperone ?
/r/MensRights30/05/26 02:41 PM
22

You are a paragon of the problem we are facing, and thus a hurdle to any and all progress. People like you create more problems than they are worth. A recent ceo fired his all female HR team because of how little utility they offered. I hope eventually more people realize the same is true for you
/r/MensRights30/05/26 07:00 AM
14

No it doesn’t. It’s regarding meetings. You are not going to be in your boss’ office very often. Unless it is to address certain matters. As mentioned earlier, that’s what emails are for. In person meetings with your boss are rare, and thus a chaperone is not an inconvenience . It would ensure the protection of her boss, if you can’t understand this , then you’re just being willfully ignorant
/r/MensRights30/05/26 06:51 AM
22

It’s a comparison between two situations in which a chaperone prevents there from being any misconduct on either party’s side
/r/MensRights30/05/26 05:58 AM
77

It’s funny because women have demanded that a female chaperone be present during sensitive medical procedures. How is that any different
/r/MensRights30/05/26 04:27 AM
5

What next man breathing ?
/r/MensRights28/05/26 09:23 PM
3

These are what mental gymnastics look like . Redefining the definition of words to suit your personal interests
/r/MensRights26/05/26 03:45 PM
3

What profession are you
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:46 AM
13

That’s very interesting
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:42 AM
5

They ruin every field they enter
/r/MensRights18/05/26 06:43 AM
278

It’s the same everywhere they go
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:55 PM
201

Becoming ??? Holy shit this guy is slow. They have been “becoming anti-male” for 40 years
/r/MensRights11/05/26 04:13 AM
32

I told you so I told you so I told you….
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/26 02:44 PM
2

Well i agree with you whole heartedly about how this push for inclusion of women is both unfair and a catastrophe. I didn’t mention anything about “ overcoming historical discrimination “ And yes I agree with you that for a lucky elite few, they will not be affected by this massive push for women in certain positions. The rest of us are facing quite the problem. It is a good sign that someone like this is speaking up though, so we shouldn’t be dismissive
/r/MensRights08/05/26 07:39 PM
8

Ya exactly. This was the same thing with Asians at Harvard. They arbitrarily decided to keep them around 15% , so people wouldn’t bat an eye. Then after the Supreme Court ruling, the numbers jumped to over 30%, and then 40% a few years later .
/r/MensRights08/05/26 05:17 PM
15

Your probably a person who espouses beliefs that their group deserves sympathy for their grievances… ironic isn’t it ?
/r/MensRights08/05/26 02:52 PM
25

Also run to men for help the most
/r/MensRights07/05/26 05:57 PM
42

Remember when I said that people like Richard reeves and Scott Galloway were controlled opposition ? Not looking so kooky now .
/r/MensRights07/05/26 03:32 AM
1

So you must clearly see the issue with women being involved so they can commandeer something. Which is the purpose of vetting. This person does not at all seem to me to care. They are just here to meet the prerequisites of their degree. If you wanted to actually bring attention to male victims of domestic violence. Like I said Donald Dutton is an expert.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 01:49 AM
3

I would also like to point out what happened with Movember. If you’re not familiar I would HIGHLY recommend looking it up. It serves as an example of what happens when they show up to “help”
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:41 PM
4

With all due respect, this person is in all likely good not here to help. They are using USA to advance their interests. If they actually cared, as I mentioned they would have a male researcher not her. Donald Dutton has done fantastic work on this issue. We should be bringing his work to light rather than wasting our time with this
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:34 PM
5

You obviously don’t understand our reservations, which is why I had to point it out for you. I think you’re just here for us to help you get your degree, not to leverage the education system to help us. Big difference . And further contributing to the inequality in higher education
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:04 PM
5

I’m just going to be blunt with you. This should be viewed with an enormous amount of suspicion. Women come here all the time pretending to “help” only to stab us in the back. I , and I think many others would prefer a male researcher. If you have an issue with that, then perhaps you have to ask yourself what your intentions were to begin with .
/r/MensRights06/05/26 05:34 PM
1

Re you male or female ?
/r/MensRights06/05/26 05:03 PM
1

As we are finding out the hard way
/r/MensRights06/05/26 03:49 PM
5

No they were not taken from a different land and sold into slavery,that’s exactly my point. Not of that happened to them and yet they ended up in a similar state of immiseration . The common denominator being fatherless homes caused by government welfare programs. You see what I mean ?
/r/MensRights05/05/26 01:53 PM
2

I just wanted to touch on a couple other points you made. Yes, im aware Jim Crowe was only in the south, but so were 90% of black Americans, which is why I implied most were living under it. You mentioned I should consider not viewing blacks as a monolith. I’ll give you my personal experience here, I grew up in an extremely multicultural neighbourhood, and was one of only a handful of “white” kids at my school. Most of us had immigrant parents. Trust me, we are viewed as just as much of a monoli…
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:58 AM
11

Look up the white underclass in England. You see shocking similarities. It can happen to any group. I’m white and I grew up without my father so I know this all too well from personal experience.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:49 AM
22

They were living under Jim Crowe laws, and thus were essentially not equal citizens. Inspite of that, they did not have the rates of fatherlessness we see today, or the rates of crime, and incarceration. If you want a parallel with the races swapped, look at the white underclass in England. Also on government assistance and similar patterns of fatherlessness and thus crime emerge.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 02:34 AM
41

Ya . This is just going to further exacerbate the resource misallocation to women that the “misandry bubble” talks about. Check out Karen Straughn’s video “fempocolypse”
/r/MensRights04/05/26 08:09 PM
79

This is essential what welfare already does. Just look at what happened to the black community. This would be a disaster
/r/MensRights04/05/26 07:59 PM
19

Whoever you suppress something it metastasizes
/r/MensRights03/05/26 05:48 AM
36

This is just another way to expand the definition of sexual assault to that more men are found guilty which will allow more women to exploit men
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:07 PM
4

What level of education ?
/r/MensRights30/04/26 02:50 PM
17

Personally I hate how many women you see at the gym now.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 12:31 AM
203

These girls don’t view you as a friend. They view you as a pet. And when their pet doesn’t behave, they get punished
/r/MensRights28/04/26 04:13 PM
3

So basically they are just parroting the talking points we came up with 5 years ago…… you know… after calling us misogynists ….
/r/MensRights28/04/26 04:05 PM
1

No way
/r/MensRights26/04/26 04:35 AM
3

Well that’s kinda what I was trying to do , ina. Tongue in cheek way. But I guess bluntness has its benefits too
/r/MensRights24/04/26 04:03 AM
1

Ya I know I was being facetious
/r/MensRights24/04/26 03:56 AM
31

I thought they were for autonomy ?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 09:28 PM
8

Not my pig, not my farm .
/r/MensRights23/04/26 02:24 AM
22

By all means. Go hang out with each other
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:49 PM
24

Here’s an easy way to prove that’s not true. Men avoid female dominated spaces like the plague
/r/MensRights22/04/26 04:17 PM
4

I have no idea why anyone would say no
/r/MensRights20/04/26 09:45 PM
4

Good news. I really hope the advisory committee is exclusively male
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:24 PM
1

I’m specifically referring to people who are becoming “influencers” . The timing of it is far too convenient.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:44 PM
0

Personally, I think other than maybe the honey badgers, they are all frauds, we just haven’t there is a saying that is relevant here : time reveals all the hidden details. I think k more will come out about these people in the near future, that will show what their intentions truly were : grifting. My reason for believing this, is the timing is very convenient. Just as some of these issues are seeing the light of day, a bunch of women are coming out of the woodwork to support the ? A little susp…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 03:47 AM
4

Personally, I think other than maybe the honey badgers, they are all frauds, we just haven’t uncovered it yet
/r/MensRights16/04/26 02:49 AM
11

Care to elaborate
/r/MensRights10/04/26 04:32 PM
15

Wow, I’m surprised
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 09:54 PM
208

And what ….. when men kill themselves, women have nothing to do with it ? Cuz if this is a precedent they want to set, there’s a lot of women who should be going to jail.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 04:20 PM
1

The point I am making is one of logistics. It would be impossible in a choatic situation to lock up hoarders of men. But women would voluntarily use their home as refuge.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 11:24 PM
2

I’ll answer for you since you dodged the question… they lock up the women, to protect them. This is what happens when the taliban first took over in Afghanistan. So basically curfews get instated , against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 11:09 PM
1

Okay let’s take your first example. How do you think people , in a chaotic environment, would react to mass r*pe, as you put it ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 10:41 PM
1

You’ve missed the point entirely. Look at what happens when a society descends into chaos or civil war.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 10:08 PM
6

Ironically the justification for keeping women out of prisons was that they are not “safe”. Well who exactly are they not safe from in FEMALE prisons …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 10:07 PM
13

It would actually be much more practical to impose a curfew on women for their safety. So feminists should be careful with this line of reasoning
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 03:17 PM
1

https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=18fqwFjerrMXTxqA Worth a listen
/r/MensRights06/04/26 10:29 PM
11

1920, was when mother custody became the legal norm
/r/MensRights06/04/26 10:28 PM
37

I would frame it as a mother-custody crisis.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 07:54 PM
2

The analogy used by Daniel Amneus is mutilated beggars
/r/MensRights04/04/26 07:38 PM
19

Or labor, or money, or favors, or listening to their problems.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 06:42 PM
95

It’s also ironic because men pay for it much more, so why would women be the ones to decide if it’s worth it? Also, aren’t most GP’s women now ? How could it be medical misogyny ? Wouldn’t it be the fault of women that wait times are so long ?
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:33 PM
8

Wow… that didn’t take long. Once again, you cannot have any conversation about someone with European ancestry without resorting to calling them a nazi or insinuating they are racist. Holy shit. I suppose we should just continue ignoring the plight or working class white boys, because it makes you uncomfortable. Because we should be colourblind, meanwhile literally everyone else can talk specially about their ethnic struggles .
/r/MensRights23/03/26 09:47 PM
6

You clearly have not been following. There are constant talk about how “ white women” treat “ men of colour” , and there is always a specific focus on black men and other minorities. If they can discuss their unique issues let’s say, then white men should be able to as well. Before you could call that a holistic view
/r/MensRights23/03/26 09:39 PM
15

People make posts about ethnic minority men all the time. This is even more true of the left wing mens rights sub. Why can’t men of European ancestry talk about their specific grievances or disadvantages ? White males specifically as a demographic are already the least likely group to go to college when born working class ? Does that sound like a river to you ? Perhaps you need change some of your preconceived notions about this topic
/r/MensRights23/03/26 09:19 PM
68

So this is what they’re worried about ? Radicalization. What about the myriad of social ills that they’re going through ? The discrimination they face ? This is akin to when they tried to preach peaceful conversion to homosexuals . That we should lovingly guide them toward heterosexuality, and how through god they can overcome their sins…. The fact that people can’t see the parallels is shocking
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/26 03:53 AM
1

https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=4BszVv7kkqDp_Dvc This video summarizes his views from two of his books. Both of which I have read
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/26 05:22 AM
7

If you really want to understand a more accurate polarity of men’s rights, it’s Daniel Amneus and Warren Farrell . To use an analogy, if Warren Farrell is Martin Luther king, Daniel Amneus is Malcolm x. A bit crude, but I think it fits. Warren Farrell even commented on Daniel Amneus’ books saying the were importnat to read even if we don’t fully agree with his perspective
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/26 09:45 PM
3

As someone aptly characterized them… they are the Richard Reeves of subreddits
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:01 AM
463

This is just gas lighting. They know men carry enormous utility, so they use shame as a tactic to exploit us. If we’re useless, then they should just do everything without us. Instead they seem peculiarly pbsessed with trying to make us to stuff for you.
/r/MensRights17/03/26 03:52 PM
63

You should be far more concerned with the men’s movement being hijacked by feminist men who are pretending to be allies but are in fact, “ controlled opposition”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:30 PM
1

Are you being sarcastic
/r/MensRights15/03/26 03:21 PM
5

Yes. Boys that go to all boys schools get better grades.
/r/MensRights15/03/26 02:52 PM
2

I guess I would wish them the best of luck then. Don’t come running back to us if things don’t work out
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 04:55 AM
2

Some of the comments you have made, really show how ideologically possessed you are, and I don’t think there’s any getting through to you. You have kind of inadvertently admitted that women are not exactly doing as well on the emotional front as you’d like to think considering they are overrepresented among those prescribed anti-depressants. So there doing great, but they’re on anti-depressants ? Also this correlates with their “liberation” . So, shouldn’t they be getting happier ? And obviously…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 04:37 AM
1

That’s not quite true, but feel free to research it more . Women happiness has also been plummeting since the 1970’s, to the point where it is actually now below men’s for the first time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 04:14 AM
1

I’m referring to the claim that single women are “ better off” . Having a higher suicide rate and rate of homelessness doesn’t seem that much better off. Referring to the desire to be in a relationship is a different discussion altogether
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/26 04:01 AM
12

This is a little naive. Very few women support us. The number areegrowing only because societal trends are shifting, not the other way around. You should be wary of people who claim to be our allies. Just look at what happened to Movember.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 04:04 AM
17

Maybe it’s a good thing they’re gunna get their own uber drivers…. That way, we don’t have to deal with them anymore
/r/MensRights12/03/26 03:54 AM
7

Hat a joke
/r/MensRights11/03/26 06:04 PM
5

Read: The War on Boys, CH Sommers. Good starting point, but it’s not the whole picture
/r/MensRights10/03/26 06:10 PM
4

God bless their hearts
/r/MensRights08/03/26 11:05 PM
6

Start with Karen Straughn . She has a YouTube channel
/r/MensRights08/03/26 10:09 PM
19

I’m currently serving and bartending for one right now LOL. Company pays for everything, and only women benefit . It’s ridiculous
/r/MensRights06/03/26 06:08 PM
40

Well maybe we should get a rape survivor and a murder surviv-…… oh ya , that doesn’t exist
/r/MensRights04/03/26 05:29 AM
2

Which is why I think it’s probable that there might exist some enclave where it is organized and minors are involved
/r/MensRights03/03/26 04:41 AM
11

So everyone is freaking out about Epstein island, which they should, as it’s quite disturbing. There have even been people claiming that it is an inherent flaw of me to be sexually perverted…. Yet all I can think, is that it’s only a matter of time before they find some sort of female equivalent for rich women.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 07:28 PM
102

No shit lol
/r/MensRights01/03/26 05:51 AM
6

It depends on what they’re actually going to do. Misguided people trying to help often make the problem worse. What they should be doing is addressing the root causes, not treating the symptoms
/r/MensRights27/02/26 08:21 PM
42

Once again shifting the burden onto the boys themselves not the people responsible for educating them
/r/MensRights23/02/26 07:54 PM
1

Kind of like animal farm
/r/MensRights23/02/26 07:48 PM
96

They are trying to indoctrinate subservience as early as possible
/r/MensRights22/02/26 05:12 AM
3

Sorry, I didn’t quite understand
/r/MensRights22/02/26 04:38 AM
37

Its funny how their response to people waking up to their propaganda, is to try and create more propaganda
/r/MensRights21/02/26 09:51 PM
79

Sounds like she’s trying to wind you up to be exploited
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:53 PM
2

The gender equity employment act was passed in Canada in 1980. That’s the moment it became legal to discriminate against us in the law
/r/MensRights19/02/26 05:36 AM
151

This is nothing new. The fact that some women are talking about it, is a sign that it’s becoming hard to ignore
/r/MensRights18/02/26 10:02 PM
12

Once again…. The lefties completely miss the mark . It’s also ironic coming from a guy who never got married and never had kids .
/r/MensRights18/02/26 06:56 PM
27

Perhaps it’s a small sign of progress that people who would have reduced us even 5 years ago, are now appearing to be willing to be to acknowledge what we’ve been saying
/r/MensRights17/02/26 08:42 PM
57

Have been for about 40 years
/r/MensRights16/02/26 08:25 PM
26

Just listen to some of the music that is also played
/r/MensRights13/02/26 08:07 PM
25

Women love the benefits of patriarchy. They just hate the reciprocal obligation - Daniel Amneus
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:50 PM
3

His description of how societies have always privileged women over men is accurate regardless of whatever his other political beliefs are
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:02 PM
1

Clearly it’s not the most efficient, considering how badly males are undercharging in our society. It is merely a lazy solution that benefits the higher ups in education, not the students.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:55 AM
4

Yes. That way the school can tailor a curriculum more specifically to the needs of their students. Boys and girls are different enough that they require different learning styles. Go look up the work of CH Sommers, she points out how boys who go to all boys schools get much better grades than their coed peers
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:47 AM
3

No , go look it up. Public schools used to be segregated between boys and girls.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:43 AM
11

Yes people certainly do. The all boys schools are constantly pressured to admit girls. Also, the majority of public schools, are coed. Single sex schools used to be the norm, now they are increasingly becoming a luxury for the wealthy who can afford private schools.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 06:40 AM
20

It’s also ironic, because I would think if we are so awful and wicked that they should be happy we have a place to ourselves where we will never bother them. But apparently not . They wand to get into every single place we occupy
/r/MensRights11/02/26 04:58 AM
94

When men ask for gender segregated schools for both genders, it’s called gender apartheid. Yet when they get them, exclusively for females, no one bats an eye
/r/MensRights11/02/26 03:17 AM
33

Go read “the privileged sex” by Martin van crevald. It’s quite the opposite. Men were treated horrible in insane asylums when they were run by the church . It’s only when medical professionals took over and revamped these institutions that they became more about “caring, and healing” that women suddenly flocked to them. When the “ mentally ill” were viewed as mostly male, lobotomies and straight jackets were the tools of choice. Once it became majority women, talk therapy became the preferred me…
/r/MensRights10/02/26 10:30 PM
200

Two seconds later …. “ uhhh women are under no obligation to help men with anything …” I think it’s obvious who broke the social contract
/r/MensRights09/02/26 11:02 PM
17

This is a violation of human rights
/r/MensRights09/02/26 03:58 AM
8

Well, if they don’t choose to do them, no one would and those necessary services would not get done. Women certainly wouldn’t . It’s a pretty shitty argument. Nurses are a n important job in our society. Mostly women. Do we disregard their complaints because “ they chose that job” ? Well no, because someone has to do it
/r/MensRights04/02/26 02:30 AM
1

“ that’s a hate crime !”
/r/MensRights29/01/26 06:50 PM
10

Yes I can clearly see the. I used to post in this sub all the time. I understand your logic. My point is that it shows how dramatic they are, that something which is obviously a superficial trait, is treated as if it were a life debilitating crises. And yes, I’m obviously aware men experience it much more which makes it ironic. But you do see what I’m saying don’t do you ?
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:59 AM
173

Listen. I understand losing your hair ca be traumatic… but a disability ? There are people who can’t walk, see, hear, speak….. my goodness
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:37 AM
29

SHOCKER….
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:22 AM
6

I think the mods have been infiltrated ….
/r/MensRights26/01/26 04:10 AM
56

The people who demand the most privacy, respect yours the least .
/r/MensRights25/01/26 06:47 PM
9

Exactly. This phrase has always bothered me. Like, children are more emotional than adults, would someone describe them as emotionally intelligent? Controlling your emotions requires intelligence, which ironically is what men are accused of doing to a detriment.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 06:08 PM
1

I’m not a fan of intersectionality for other reasons. Mostly that many of the things it presupposes are actually false. But that’s a whole other conversation. What you’re suggesting is the male/female dichotomy in intersectionality is not useful, and when grafted onto certain racial issues it undermines them more?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 11:41 PM
1

Sorry, can you clarify a bit for me. Perhaps with an example
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/26 11:10 PM
4

Read Daniel Amneus’ work. He has a pretty good collection of
/r/MensRights11/01/26 04:22 PM
1

It always seems to good to be true
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:09 AM
18

I find it very convenient that suddenly when the pendulum is starting to swing, and society is starting to talk about boys, that data like this would emerge. Despite whatever subjective feelings people may report , boys are still vastly over represented among social ills: homelessness, suicide, physical abuse, prison. I’m sorry the girls “feel” like they have it so bad, but boys clearly have it worse.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:06 PM
1

It’s ironic because we are always accused of being “traditionalists” and wanting “ women to get back in the kitchen”. In reality traditionalism is something society keeps in standby for women, in case they get tired of whatever their other roles are, they then live off of the labor of a man.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 08:53 AM
1

Exactly. Preemptive measures exist for a reason, as well as cost of entry to institutions to prevent free-riding or worse, internal sabotage
/r/MensRights03/01/26 11:21 AM
5

I’m not advocating for “purity”. Look up what happened to Movember, as a clear example of how some bad actors can show up pretending to help, but have their own nefarious intentions at heart.
/r/MensRights01/01/26 12:44 AM
10

Movember* with an m. As in the organization. If you don’t know what happened, then I’d highly suggest looking it up.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:13 PM
14

The point I’m making is that we should be prepared for people to flock to this movement who are not sincere. Many will be women. Do not be head over heels because you think this signifies change. These people could be bad actors. If you want a microcosm of what I’m talking about, look at what happened with Movember.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 09:04 PM
1

Fair point, but you get what I mean when I use the word programmed.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:26 PM
13

We are all evolutionarily programmed. It is the biology that dictates our behaviour. Men are “programmed” to find certain behaviours attractive, or to jockey for status. That is an example of what I mean by that word.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 08:08 PM
8

Why is it that everywhere they go , all they do is complain, and make rules for how we should behave. And yet they never hold themselves to the same standard?
/r/MensRights26/12/25 10:28 PM
1

You might want to look at female prisons if you think that savagery is exclusively a male phenomenon. It’s an interesting microcosm of what a female only space can look like. The point I made in my earlier comment clearly went right over your head.
/r/MensRights23/12/25 08:54 AM
1

You’ve just figured out the privilege of being the scarcer reproductive resource. I suppose you’d rather trade places ? I thought not.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 10:19 PM
2

I’m not familiar with the war on drugs. I have heard about it, but I’m Canadian, and from what I recall it was a mostly American phenomenon.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 07:33 PM
53

All these attempts to label boys as incels, toxics masculinity, and trying to correct misogyny, and fix the boys themselves are all similar attempts to what was done historically to try and “fix” gay people. That’s what they have Ben trying to do to men over the past 40 years, and they been especially ramping it up in the past decades.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 05:45 PM
93

As a gay person, you should know better than anyone, that when you suppress something. It metastasizes. This society wide attempt to “erase the man inside” is akin to when society tried to suppress and erase homosexuality…. How did that go ? Ya….
/r/MensRights20/12/25 05:24 PM
268

I love how this is their concern when it comes to boys. Crushing the potential misogynist inside. Forgot the fact that they are struggling, and failing. Let’s turn them into good little second class citizens who are subservient to women.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 12:31 AM
2

I didn’t say everything in this sub has it wrong. But I do feel there is too much of that, and those guys come up here often enough, that I used them as examples. Christina Hoff Sommers , Warren Farrell, and obviously the Tinmen are good of examples of lefties who correctly address the problem that men face in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 06:07 AM
2

So it would be a lot to unpack right now, but I can give just a few examples that might shed light into what I mean. People like Richard reeves and more recently Scott Galloway have become prominent figures among leftists who speak about men’s problems and they tend to miss the mark. They are paragons of what I’m talking about. They focus too much on trying to fit men into these already existing political frameworks, rather than acknowledging that they are not working for men and have actually c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/12/25 03:50 AM
1

I’m not usually a fan of this sub because I think there is a lot of ideological obfuscating, which diverts things away from men specifically, But this is a very good and insightful post
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/25 05:10 AM
13

Lmaooo so they basically admit that that’s exactly why they wanted the asymmetry, so they could falsely accuse you.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 06:03 AM
80

It’s ironic because when we mention what about us, they reply by saying “ why should I respect someone if they didn’t earn it”. Yet they try to force these boys at a young age to do that very same thing. These people are bullies who are demanding subservience, not respect, and they target the young because they are defenceless
/r/MensRights13/12/25 03:47 PM
1

I’m sorry, can you elaborate on what you mean by riding coattails ?
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:58 PM
11

Ya your take makes far more sense. Our hyper feminized culture and education system has created a vacuum that these people are unfortunately filling. I hoped this would be a wake up call for society, but instead they seem intent on continued suppression , which will only make things worse.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:29 PM
11

And life insurance
/r/MensRights12/12/25 07:57 AM
12

I hate this country.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 03:58 PM
68

When you’re right, you’re wrong. When you’re wrong you’re wrong. When they’re right they’re right, when they’re wrong, they’re right. Sounds familiar
/r/MensRights09/12/25 12:34 AM
248

It always makes me laugh when they think they are the ones who are silenced
/r/MensRights08/12/25 10:40 PM
30

Don’t worry, there will be another article next week about how traditionally masculine men are the problem and women are independent now
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:59 PM
155

Almost like couverture never ended. Somehow they are “emancipated” and yet they are still your responsibility.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:34 AM
73

It’s ironic because then they’ll complain about a men’s only group, or why aren’t you inviting you’re female colleagues to something
/r/MensRights29/11/25 07:43 PM
19

Men murdering women already received a significantly longer sentence than a woman killing man. The presumption of equality before the law was never truly upheld in this context and now it is codified policy. Whenever someone talks about legal subjugation of women in certain third world countries, this is evidence that where they have jurisprudence , they would do the exact same thing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 06:19 PM
3

And this is the crux of this issue. Harassment and violence are not the same thing. And conflating these two things isn’t helpful. Violence is physical , and harassment is not necessarily
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 03:53 PM
3

I agree with the first half of what you said, not the second. What you’re describing softens the reality of violence if you expand it to include other behaviours, which there are already words for.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 09:36 AM
4

Just like I mentioned in my previous comment, then you obfuscating the purpose of the word. And in this case, they are doing so intentionally for political purposes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 09:02 AM
4

As per the standard definition of the word, violence is physical. Not emotional, not verbal, not psychological. It is physical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 08:51 AM
13

They’re underrepresented in the private sector because they’re over represented in the public sector …. It’s really that simple
/r/MensRights27/11/25 07:27 AM
2

https://youtu.be/btA_0xbwsdc?si=tPceaBwuo-PLkpAt You might enjoy this video as I think it is an apt description of what you are talking about
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 03:22 AM
12

Well as I mentioned before, that is an effective way to obfuscate reality for political purposes. The other thing they intentionally leave out is that most death threats are aimed at men, not women. So by the logic you pointed out about preemptive concern, it is misdirected to focus on women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/25 03:08 AM
17

I mean it’s only fair given the lifestyle he’s accustomed to ….. obvious sarcasm *
/r/MensRights26/11/25 10:03 PM
9

Those are things that would constitute harassment , which I agree can be very bad.Violence is very much physical by definition, unless of course you are going to charge the definition, which the just obscures what we are talking about even more. This is exactly what feminists have done with many other words, which is expand the definition to include absolutely everything, as means to advance their political agenda.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 08:24 PM
8

How can “violence” be digital ? Pretty laughable
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 06:38 PM
37

How can “violence” be digital ? If you think that’s possible, you don’t know the reality of violence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/25 03:28 PM
69

So I’m actually curious about this. I definitely think the subject of workplace discrimination is under discussed, even here. But I’m a bit surprised that the AI’s show this kind of bias. This must be something that the developers intentionally placed in it ?
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:13 AM
1

My apologies I thought you were saying I was the one putting on that facade.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:32 PM
1

I’m not sure if you’re referring to me or not. I don’t frequent the sub you mentioned at all, so I’m not sure why your brought that up. And I haven’t made any comments around integrity or ethics…. When I was referring to idealists, I was referring to you and how I’ve known many people who have said the same thing only to be shocked when the right moment comes
/r/MensRights25/11/25 09:14 PM
4

cough Rob Henderson cough
/r/MensRights25/11/25 07:20 PM
13

Daniel Amneus’ books have lots of quotes from feminists that are perfect examples of misandry
/r/MensRights25/11/25 05:15 AM
56

Ya, can confirm
/r/MensRights22/11/25 06:23 AM
10

Every idealist is inevitably mugged by reality. Your time will come
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:22 AM
10

Well here’s a thought experiment for you. Men and boys today are in a position where they need help, and women aren’t exactly lining up . You see? Instead all you get the feminist rhetoric that you need to solve your own problems and that women have no obligation to you. Also ironic is these are the same people that say you should lay down your life for women and provide for them, and protect them. LOL. What I want you to see is that if even for a second you think that you will receive any recip…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:10 AM
10

Ya I can see that.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 10:53 PM
48

I disagree . This is why we don’t need male elementary teachers. The women made their choice, they want the bear. Maybe they should be the ones to die for the consequences of their actions
/r/MensRights21/11/25 06:56 PM
72

Wars have been happening across all sorts or regions and different times, which would by definition not be exclusive to white men. The other thing as that war is fought to preserve the life of the community , meaning women and children. If it weren’t for men fighting them, then those women who apparently are so opposed to war would just be consumed into the invading tribe as sex slaves, or worse killed. So it’s men who are putting their lives on the line for the protection of their female kin
/r/MensRights21/11/25 05:07 PM
16

It’s obviously done on purpose to denigrate things
/r/MensRights19/11/25 08:31 PM
68

Human slavery right here
/r/MensRights14/11/25 03:47 AM
3

This is in fact the norm. Some people call it “stealth alimony”. It was the intent of these feminists right from the beginning , to use children as mutilated beggars, so women could extract resources from their ex-husbands, with no intent it ever ending up in the hands of children.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:31 PM
54

I can’t count how many times a woman has told me “ cuz you’re a man !”. And it’s always in reference to her perception of how easy I have things. Funny how the litany of statistics related to social ills never come up though….
/r/MensRights12/11/25 04:42 AM
108

The people who constantly demand privacy, have no respect for anyone else’s
/r/MensRights10/11/25 01:48 AM
22

I honestly don’t understand the point of this
/r/MensRights09/11/25 08:26 PM
10

Personally, I much prefer if I could request a male doctor, male nurse, male driver, you name it. But for some reason the group of people who advocates this stuff exclusively for themselves, always seems to shut it down for others. While also, demanding to enter into those same spaces, occupied by the same people they claim to be trying to get away from ? You do see that right ?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:52 PM
11

Exactly. The vetting, even in this sub should be much more stringent. This should serve as an example of why they should not be trusted.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 03:46 PM
311

This is exactly why we don’t want them “helping”
/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:57 AM
110

The real question is how many other men have suffered because of things like this, but have been powerless to do anything about it
/r/MensRights02/11/25 04:51 AM
72

I hope he wins
/r/MensRights02/11/25 04:42 AM
73

“ why aren’t men going to school..” “ why aren’t men working ..”
/r/MensRights01/11/25 03:32 AM
139

You mean the group of people who get more scholarships, more job placements, better healthcare, have more social services, work less hours, have more parental rights, and spend more of their spouses money are struggling ? ….. gee… wonder how the other guys are doing
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:18 PM
6

Ya exactly…. That’s what we’re trying to do, until they shut it down
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:30 PM
8

Exactly …. I would think that if we’re so awful they’d be happy to see us be on our own amongst ourselves.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:27 PM
16

It’s funny that whenever we demand male only spaces, they are shutdown as sexist, even thought they’ll have little to no effect on women. It is labelled gender apartheid. Meanwhile, they advocate for female only at our expense, without creating an option for us. You could in theory have seperate cars for men and women, but this is just asking for coed, plus female only. They really have no consideration for us as humans
/r/MensRights27/10/25 08:29 PM
97

What they should be doing is shaming women for dissolving these unions and creating single parent households
/r/MensRights27/10/25 03:36 PM
1

Ya that’s why people “say” that. The reality is men are the primary victims, but women end up with some collateral damage
/r/MensRights27/10/25 04:53 AM
18

What’s ironic, is that those surviving women and children end up in squalor, or dependent on government aid. So…. By letting men die/fall through the cracks, women and children end up sinking pretty fast. Go look into the results of the Rwanda genocide
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:52 AM
29

This is why they are viewed with suspicion. They infiltrate destroy from within.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 07:23 PM
7

I’d love to hear more people like you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/25 07:21 AM
2

We all make mistakes
/r/MensRights19/10/25 05:05 AM
82

You mean …… exactly what women have done ?
/r/MensRights19/10/25 04:16 AM
6

Did you even read my comment ? I’m referring to the fact that this sub is not right wing.
/r/MensRights19/10/25 03:38 AM
11

It’s not. The lefts man hatred obviously outweighs that of the right, but literally every other comment on post about how the left hates men is always “ya, but the right hates men too” Unfortunately, men are politically stranded
/r/MensRights18/10/25 06:01 PM
9

Well…. It was nice knowing him
/r/MensRights18/10/25 05:02 AM
29

This guy started in what was essentially a propaganda piece, that vilified young boys as criminals, and now he is telling fathers how they should communicate with their sons? Sounds like more finger wagging and gaslighting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 06:21 PM
6

Feminists call themselves advocates of gender equality. They clearly only care about women. Therefore men rights advocates should only focus on men. If they were to drop the facade, I think more people would be less inclined to support them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 11:38 PM
4

Ya I agree
/r/MensRights10/10/25 07:13 PM
7

Perhaps a shift in the zeitgeist
/r/MensRights10/10/25 06:12 PM
72

I wholeheartedly support her decision
/r/MensRights10/10/25 05:02 PM
29

Both the left and the right have been blowing smoke up women’s asses for over a generation now. To describe them as shitting on women is completely out of touch with reality. The left btw have endorse insane rhetoric about men for decades now.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 05:28 AM
30

I personally don’t find her facially attractive at all. But hey, I guess everybody has a type. That said, her appearance should give no weight to her opinions.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 03:22 AM
25

I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. But I don’t exactly think she’s attractive
/r/MensRights07/10/25 03:18 AM
20

She’s not exactly the most attractive woman herself, so she shouldn’t really be mocking someone else’s appearance
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:29 AM
26

I swear it feels like every month is like women’s studies month or something
/r/MensRights01/10/25 12:13 AM
7

Your post history in this sub is extremely gunocentric
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:52 AM
61

I’m just letting you know, that you’ll probably eventually end up on there too. You’ll one day do something one of your female colleagues won’t like, and they will treat you the same as the rest of them. Don’t think that because you’re gay, you’ll somehow be spared.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:37 AM
5

The problem is already obvious. There will be many fallacious claims of domestic violence in order to obtain the children.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 05:23 AM
75

It’s kind of ironic, that women have said , that in fact mother custody is actually oppressive, and an instrument of the patriarchy….. and in fact when a bill is passed for shared parenting, whose opposed to it …… it’s women…..
/r/MensRights29/09/25 05:55 PM
32

It’s funny cuz then they say the problem with men’s health is they don’t go to the doctor …. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t .
/r/MensRights27/09/25 06:19 PM
34

The sad reality for many of these older women, is that their pickings are even slimmer. Young women are the most sought after group in the dating market because of the fertility. Next comes middle aged men, usually because of the status and resources they have acquired. Young men usually come next, because they still have their youth/looks, potentially status through their family ties, and future potential. In dead last comes older women sadly. They have no reproductive capacity, and most men do…
/r/MensRights25/09/25 07:33 AM
18

This guy doesn’t care. He just ignores any evidence to the contrary.
/r/MensRights21/09/25 05:56 AM
15

In a couple decades the problem will be quite the opposite. There will be an excess of childless women who aren’t contributing enough in taxing and are a drain on the system. They take more than they put in. These people should be careful what they wish for, but they might get it, caveat being , it will be them.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 03:51 PM
28

Yup. “Breeding grounds for sexism” is only a concern for boys only. They get a free pass for their bigotry.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 05:45 AM
28

Maybe he should exclusively hang out with women. Until he eventually realizes they’re not perfect either
/r/MensRights17/09/25 05:49 PM
3

Kevin Kelly writes about tech. He wrote a book called “the inevitable” . he says that in the future every child will have their entire genome sequenced at birth.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:23 PM
7

I liked reading your response. I wasn’t a fan of his, but I never believed he deserved to die. And the fact that he was killed during a debate on a college campus, is a paragon for what the left has become. Seeing people rejoice this, makes me sick. And people should just keep in mind, that you should pay attention to how people treat their enemies, because once they redefine you from friend to enemy, that’s the treatment you’ll get.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 03:42 AM
2

EXACTLY…. There some dummies, even here, that think he is bringing this issue into the public eye LOL. No….. the growing number of men withdrawing are brining attention to this, and stealing the spotlight.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:33 PM
3

Exactly…. People say ohh he’s brining attention to the issue in a palatable way …. Bullshit, he’s trying to commandeer the movement to suppress any real action. Take what happened after the 2024 election. After the realized young men voted for trump, people were wondering why , and then they call him in to ask what should be done…… instead, they could’ve asked tons of different people who have useful ideas, but he takes centre stage .
/r/MensRights10/09/25 03:37 PM
0

Well we have our own filter too, it’s called our eyes….
/r/MensRights10/09/25 02:55 PM
5

Well, you might want to consider this events are actually statistically rare, although traumatic to hear about. Secondly, most Everyman who committed a violent crime, robbery, or abused someone, even rapist, were men who were raised by a single mother. It’s shocking how it is the root cause of so many of these problems. Third, one of the biggest reasons there is not as much reciprocal violence ( there is obviously but it is not near parody) because women are not as physically capable. Domestic v…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:34 AM
7

He realizes that the feminist machinery will not continue to operate without men turning the gears…. Check Out The Misandry Bubble if you haven’t already. Reeves fits the description of the lefty effeminate men who support the feminist vanguard
/r/MensRights09/09/25 08:02 PM
5

Your last paragraph is the perfect description of this guy
/r/MensRights09/09/25 07:58 PM
6

Women will always find any little reason to criticize you and blow it out of proportion. It’s not what you did… it’s how you made them “feel” . This is childish, and leads to the degradation of institutions. As more talented people leave and industry, it begins to decline.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 06:05 PM
77

Secretly it always has been
/r/MensRights08/09/25 08:29 PM
139

Isn’t it a coincidence that they are always boys ….
/r/MensRights08/09/25 03:43 AM
1

As pointed out in the Misandry Bubble, the pendulum that has swung in the favor of women for the past 100 years, will now start swinging in the other direction, post 2020. Alfred Adler, a renowned psychologist for his time, actually wrote in his book “ Understanding Human Nature”, written in 1920, that if only we invested more in the education of women, perhaps they could match, even exceed the academic achievements of men. Oh how times have changed. That was 100 years ago, and now we are seeing…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 07:13 AM
13

They wonder why people avoid women
/r/MensRights07/09/25 04:36 AM
9

“ why are men not going to college…” Like are you kidding me?
/r/MensRights07/09/25 04:23 AM
7

Ya, I definitely see this as a possibility
/r/MensRights05/09/25 06:27 PM
14

Why is it always assumed men are trying to get women pregnant on purpose? As if it couldn’t possibly be women who behave irresponsibly , and deceptively ?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 08:46 PM
2

This is a very good take
/r/MensRights03/09/25 05:15 AM
64

Yet another example of what I said before. The first thing women do once they get any political leverage is discriminate against men
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:35 AM
16

I saw a post about a girl who was angry that her date wanted to split the bill. …. “Well he asked me out so he should have to pay…” LOL. And maybe he decided you weren’t worth it…. I suppose if you accepted him paying, that consensus means he deserves sex right ? LOL. This is the definition of entitlement
/r/MensRights01/09/25 12:27 AM
29

Honestly, Im just gunna be frank with you, the fact that your a female makes me believe this is complete bs or a trap
/r/MensRights30/08/25 04:28 AM
1

Btw … don’t you see what an enormous set of mental gymnastics you just did ? You’ve been arguing that taking care of children is a huge burden… and that this falls solely on women. And yet, when I tell you that it used to be the opposite, that men used to be primarily responsible for children in divorce, suddenly it’s a position of power ? Do you not see that ? So it’s a burden when women get them, but it’s a luxury when men do ? If women don’t want to take care of kids, why do they pressure the…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:41 AM
1

It never ceases to amaze me the amount of deflections people engage in. Rather than just acknowledging that yes there was a time when fathers got custody, and that today women have unfairly stacked the legal system in their favor, it becomes something out of their control, it wasn’t their fault, they had “no rights”. When men get custody, it’s their fault, when women get custody it’s men’s fault. Ya pretty much. When addressing sole mother custody people will say “it’s the patriarchy!” , “it’s a…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:35 AM
1

No, this is false. Even when the factor for socioeconomic status this is true. Poor single dads outperform poor single moms…. While also not receiving child support or alimony. And no, mom gets custody most of the time because it is the default setting of the legal system. It has only started to slowly change post- 2020. Feminists began pressure the courts to change these laws in 1870, and by 1920, sole mother custody was the norm. Prior to 1870, father custody was the default setting for the le…
/r/MensRights29/08/25 01:24 AM
81

I have an idea ! I say we help women….. no seriously… I say we give them more special scholarships, more funding, more job placements, more special programs, more policy directed at their needs. And you know what ? Let’s punish men some more ! More jail time, more layoffs, more neglect….. I mean, it’s what we’ve been doing for 40 years…. Maybe if we double down and do it some more, it’ll help? Right ?!
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:03 AM
1

If you look at the outcomes between single mothers and single fathers, fathers have better outcomes for children…. Soo clearly they do a better job than mothers .
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:55 AM
1

He actively denies that men face ANY discrimination. He has done this multiple times. He denies feminists have played any role in this… even though he unintentionally points it out. He refuses to consider gender segregated schools as an option…. Even though that is what we KNOW works. He completely dismisses CH Sommers book “The War on Boys” , without even addressing anything she wrote in it. And what’s his solution to these problems….. holding boys back a year ….. are you fffing kidding me ??? …
/r/MensRights28/08/25 04:52 AM
6

Yup …. You know who shows up to comandeer it
/r/MensRights26/08/25 04:47 PM
7

Karen Straughn made a video about this a decade ago
/r/MensRights26/08/25 03:17 PM
3

Signed
/r/MensRights26/08/25 03:57 AM
16

Honestly, I can’t stand this guy, and everyone who thinks he will actually benefit the well being of men is completely delusional. Controlled opposition is the best descriptor of this doorknob. I’m sorry you can’t see it. All he will do is help advance the feminist agenda under the guise of “helping men” Do not be fooled
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:14 AM
11

He’s a moron and I can’t stand how people just eat up his word vomit. Everything he says is just more feminism and seeks to further severe women. I honestly think a person must be completely retarded to think he is actually an ally. On the subject of gender segregated schools, this is obviously the solution in the short term, and the fact that he dismisses it should be the final red flag.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 04:11 AM
26

Wherever women have jurisprudence
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:36 AM
3

Rob Henderson has also shared such sentiments. And yet he has been invited to speak at conferences about the problems men and boys face
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:39 PM
21

I actually saw that post LOL. You can’t even have an opinion among men anymore. I know for a fact , one of the mods is a female, and I’m sure she had something to do with it . Once again, this is why people gatekeep
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:59 AM
9

What a joke. Remember when a female student refused to share a change room with a male student who was trans? She was lauded as a hero ..
/r/MensRights19/08/25 04:24 AM
10

Once we eliminate the male role, it’s only a matter of time before we go back to our more basal mode of being, the ghetto the Stone Age, and the barnyard. Just look at how the black community is doing since the erasure of the role of the male/father. Not exactly a paradise is it. This is a really good testament to the sentiments that are rampant throughout academia, that is infesting itself in the minds of its graduates. Rob Henderson who has spoken about events regarding men’s issues even perpe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 08:23 PM
1

So fishing for crimes to inflate statistics, so they can perpetuate their phoney narrative at the expense of their own safety and national security ?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 05:44 AM
40

Meanwhile they completely ignore grooming gangs by foreigners ….
/r/MensRights15/08/25 09:50 PM
2

Karen Straughn does a very good job of summarizing many of the arguments presented here. https://youtu.be/vp8tToFv-bA?si=JZxxj6b4MK3wvjBH
/r/MensRights15/08/25 04:35 AM
76

There’s so much irony here, I don’t have words
/r/MensRights07/08/25 07:53 PM
2

I’m not building bureaucracy, far from it. I’m saying these factions are very different from one another. It also sounds like you’re in quite a predicament considering what you went through . I hope you get through it.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 11:05 PM
2

Don’t you feel that is conflating a lot of different groups who have completely different perspectives on things, and different priorities ? Isn’t it a bit of a reductive way to look at the current issue ? I mean just off the bat, MGTOW, and red-pill are completely different and contradictory. One has sworn off women completely, and the other is about traditional advice to get a girlfriend, or sex . I don’t think lumping all these groups together is an accurate way to represent their views.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 10:07 PM
2

Can you define for me what exactly is considered the “manosphere”
/r/MensRights06/08/25 09:11 PM
8

Yes this is a very accurate description of the problem
/r/MensRights05/08/25 05:45 PM
2

Yes which is why the claim that he is controlled opposition isn’t all that ridiculous
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:33 PM
3

Go look at some of the replies this guy gave me . His logic is that why would someone who worked on this issues from 25+ years ago be given any credence. I don’t have words to describe such incoherent thinking… These are the types who like Richard reeves.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 11:01 PM
11

I suppose we should just stay silent forever about who is doing us harm
/r/MensRights03/08/25 10:51 PM
5

As you can see, Reeves is not very popular in this sub, and it’s pretty obvious why. And yes I did point to at least one major reason that Reeves is wrong about. He actively denies that there is any such thing as discrimination against boys in school. I’m sure you deny this as well. If you actually think, that Reeves is going to have a long term positive impact on boys and men, you are mistaken. I remember, when I first heard of this guy, I had my hopes up. After reading his content, and watchin…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:32 PM
3

This guy is exaaaactly the kind of guy who would support Richard reeves….
/r/MensRights03/08/25 02:21 PM
5

If you’d read her book, you’d see that the problems boys are facing today are EXACTLY the same in the school system. That’s exactly why she’s relevant. People don’t want to listen because it’s not politically convenient for them. I would think that if your conviction that reeves is the only guy with the answers is so strong, then wouldn’t you be willing to stress test them by reading something else that may offer different insight ? Of concourse, not , you’d rather just stay with a parochial vie…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 02:12 PM
7

As I mentioned before, Warren Farrell, and Ch Sommers were in what you referred to as the problem stream and policy stream LOOOONG before Reeves was…. Sommers wrote her book back in 2000. I suggest you give it a read. She suggests much more useful solutions in the short term for this problem. All have been ignored. She also document exactly how feminists ( who she used to align herself with) are actively making this problem much worse and are doing so on purpose. So when you say things suggestin…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 07:52 AM
85

Btw… feminists didn’t solve their issues on their own… they got an enormous amount of funding from wealthy men and government subsidy( men’s tax dollars). Go look at women’s sports as another example of their siphoning of resources
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/25 07:40 AM
10

No those are not his main views. That is what has become undeniable , and a lot of other people who have been more honest about it. CH Sommers, Warren Farrell, are a couple. A lot of people here refer to Reeves as controlled opposition and rightfully so. He is just a. Puppet repeat the same feminist talking points, but under the guise of helping men. He is just meant to divert attention and resources away from any actually momentum meant to help men. If you genuinely care about the well being of…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 06:52 AM
16

This is so well put. I absolutely hate when this guy gets posted here. He literally just parrots all the same feminist talking points, but some people are stupid enough to think it is progress. I sometimes wonder how much they are paying this guy.. All this energy that has been generated after people voted for trump as a backlash, will be nullified if it is channeled through him. What a waste.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 05:52 AM
6

Did you even read what I said ? The only reason this shift started was because they voted for trump which sent shockwaves through the Democrats. Otherwise we would still be waiting around for people to take action. Unfortunately that’s what it takes. Your second paragraph to me is irredeemable and exactly what I mean by you should inform yourself more.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 05:16 AM
129

If you have ever wondered why there is any apprehension about letting women into a space, just look at what happens when you give them any leverage.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 04:42 AM
6

Oh yes I’m aware that now a few politicians have tried adding mens problems to their post form …. Why is that ?? Oh YA ! Cuz they LOST the election. They Lost because young men voted against them. They lashed out and now EVERYONE has to acknowledge them…. If they just continued to behave like good little boys we would still be ignoring them. By voting for trump, people woke up. And your assertion that republicans are trying tos end women back home is really just a testament that you don’t know w…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:53 AM
5

That one I haven’t. I have seen his Ted talk, him on Chris Williamson, and on the thetinman. I doubt his views have changed much
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:49 AM
5

Feel free to continue waiting patiently for progress and change that’s never gunna come from people who don’t really care.
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:45 AM
12

Denying that discrimination against boys exist, is a horrendous error . It is one of the main reasons they suffer. Second, if you think feminists have nothing to do with this, you are so far out to lunch that I can’t help you. Third, he doesn’t address ANY of the root causes of these problems: fatherless ness, often caused by bias courts and irresponsible mothers, criminal justice system bias, and then how much further boys get hurt by the preferential treatment that gets heaped onto women. Noth…
/r/MensRights03/08/25 03:42 AM
16

His book was terrible, and his talks are terrible. I’ve seen him speak. He also DENIES there is any such thing as discrimination against boys…. Even though there is plenty of evidence. How is exactly can you trust someone who is this dishonest ?
/r/MensRights03/08/25 02:46 AM
15

Exactly . I have said this front eh f***ing start. He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He is hijaking the conversation to divert attention away from any real solutions
/r/MensRights03/08/25 02:27 AM
60

Btw…. Richard Reeves is the guy who actively denies discrimination against boys in the school system exists…. And he actively denies feminism has played any role in problems men face ….
/r/MensRights02/08/25 08:29 PM
4

Daniel Amneus. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=oWU8CTBGi0unJTjb
/r/MensRights02/08/25 02:51 PM
22

Just keep quiet while they continue to make you a second class citizen…. Great advice …
/r/MensRights02/08/25 04:13 AM
1

This is what I was talking about in a post I made a while back about skepticism regarding men in primary teaching. I warned that they will be used “ as an arm of the feminist movement”
/r/MensRights01/08/25 04:16 PM
14

remember when Richard Reeves said there is NO evidence of discrimination ? LOL
/r/MensRights28/07/25 02:38 PM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/AWDTSGisToxic/s/smFl50Eomh Btw… in regards to what you said.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 08:49 PM
3

Ya … the devil doesn’t want to be exposed ? Kind of like why these women tried to remain anonymous ? LOL Trust me I don’t date. But slowly is coming to an end the era of anonymous false accusations.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 03:22 PM
4

You basically just show everyone what a bigot you are. And you also just completely denying the false accusations that people were making. I’ll say it again because you don’t seem to understand, doxxing is illegal. But you seem to think you’re above the law.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 03:19 PM
58

“False accusations don’t ruin lives” Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if this leads to another lawsuit, and perhaps changes the conversation about how we should treat people who are proven not guilty
/r/MensRights27/07/25 03:12 PM
3

No you guys hate us coming together which is why you shut down everything we do. And you also conveniently ignored the illegal behaviour women were engaging in.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:44 AM
4

You know that’s not true. People were posting addresses, personal pictures , making derogatory remarks, doxxing people. And yet it still stood. Yours should have been shut down a long time ago.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:37 AM
6

LOL. Try again, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary
/r/MensRights27/07/25 05:13 AM
2

So you are admitting that you think we are subhuman ?
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:18 PM
1

Your comment proves what I’m talking about. You think we are subhuman
/r/MensRights26/07/25 02:14 PM
115

It’s ironic because some girls have responded by saying “ what are you afraid to hide ?” , well clearly this applies to them as well
/r/MensRights24/07/25 09:26 PM
64

All you ever hear is how if women ran the world , things would be more fair, and yet every time we see them rise to a position of authority, the first thing they do it give themselves further preferential treatment
/r/MensRights24/07/25 02:52 PM
22

40 % of accusations are false according to head of the DA in manhattan. But you can see why men want to avoid you. Female drivers for females, and male drivers for males. Problem solved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 11:11 PM
37

The same is true for certain minority groups. And if that’s your logic, you should understand why give. The prevalence of false accusations, men would not want to serve a woman
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 11:02 PM
61

If you felt unsafe around someone, you’d stay away from them, not demand access into every space they occupy in society. You also would be prying into their personal lives to gossip about them. Men feel unsafe around women which is why they are avoiding them
/r/MensRights23/07/25 09:16 PM
44

This is proof that the only acceptable bigotry is against males. On a racial or religious front this wouldn’t fly
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/25 08:32 PM
29

What would need to be done to make this happen
/r/MensRights23/07/25 02:42 AM
118

Is it actually possible to get this removed ?
/r/MensRights22/07/25 10:16 PM
34

Yes I agree. I’ve been saying this to people and yet they don’t listen. He has done some things that are inadvertently good for men. Cutting a lot of the DEI stuff, and putting the DOE on the chopping block. But the point was voting for Trump was a duck you to Democrats. It’s a reflection of their own failings.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 06:20 PM
82

He’s not. Accountability would have been acknowledging his part in this, which he did not do.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:39 PM
64

Fat chance…. Trump winning signalled a paradigm shift. Democrats will lose if they continue to ignore men
/r/MensRights22/07/25 05:18 PM
278

This guy is the biggest culprit. He also denied a White House council on men and boys.
/r/MensRights22/07/25 04:11 PM
29

Martin van crevald touches on this in his book the privileged sex. He talks about how women are never reprimanded and if they ever are it’s a gentle slap on the wrist that involves speaking to another woman ( counselling ) .
/r/MensRights21/07/25 11:47 PM
7

So it’s suggesting that part of the contraction is NOT due to ai displacing tech jobs, but actually more tech jobs have opened up ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/25 07:25 PM
37

Honestly, compared to the myriad of problems that men have, I think not getting asked out isn’t all that big a deal
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:32 PM
1

I could be mistaken. He’d be the guy to ask. But I recall a post he made talking about it
/r/MensRights18/07/25 08:05 PM
12

Isn’t she the girl who grifted her way into this space and then falsely accused the tinmen of harrassment ?
/r/MensRights18/07/25 07:46 PM
-2

They’re not
/r/MensRights18/07/25 02:36 AM
2

My point is it just adapts to what is politically expedient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:15 PM
7

Don’t kid yourself, there are plenty of left wing feminists. And even those early feminists flip flopped their opinion when it was convention for them. Betty Friedan was a perfect example of this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 06:04 PM
38

Feminism isn’t exactly right wing. It’s bipartisan. They use whoever they can for their political expedience
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/25 05:45 AM
8

Well no that would cross biological boundaries. Nobody wants to raise kids that aren’t theirs lol. Between both biological parents, the parent with the greater earning potential, is better equipped to give them a higher standard of living. That’s the logic. Also, researchers have factored for socio-economic status, and poor single parents still have the same gaps in outcome. Single dads who are poor still win. What’s shocking is that where the difference is biggest is in psychological disturbanc…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 03:11 AM
8

I was raised by a single mother, so I have an inside scoop LOL And btw, your point about socio economic status, is exactly why kids should be put in their custody as due to their larger paycheque, they will be better able to provision for them. There are also different parenting styles that men employ, that improve children’s lives in a way that men don’t. Your argument is basically to factor out every single variable that makes a difference. That would only leave a tiny number of women who are …
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:31 AM
16

Kids that are raised by their father are much better off. Go read “The Case for Father Custody” by Daniel Amneus. Shared custody actually creates an unstable environment, and incentivizes divorce more than father custody does.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 02:10 AM
25

Best interests of the child would mean putting them in the custody of their biological father, where they are the safest, mostly likely climb the socio economic ladder, and most likely to avoid the social ills cause by mother custody
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:10 AM
7

I think there are a lot of presuppositions that you believe that are false, and I can’t possibly go into them. Regarding accidental pregnancy, this is almost always due to behaving irresponsibly. You have the birth control pill, the morning after pill, and you can give the child up for adoption. Motherhood, even without abortion, is a choice. Fatherhood is not. Unless you practice celibacy, which apparently isn’t fair to demand of women, and so it shouldn’t be fair to demand of men. Many men did…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 01:22 AM
9

Well here’s where I disagree with you. It’s that men do give women sympathy. Society has bent over backwards for them for over 50 years. Where we have shown them that men also struggle we have been met with complete apathy. Just because someone feels a certain why doesn’t mean it is factually correct. Google the women are wonderful effect. This shows how women discriminate against men much more than men do against women. It also discredits their claim that if women were in charge, things would b…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 09:09 PM
3

There is some truth to what your saying in that there is always opposite to a group that might be suffering although you did not pick the best examples. There will always be people saying to pick yourself up by your bootstraps no matter how insurmountable the odds are. Taking responsibility despite the how unlikely the odds are. So in that sense you are right. But you’d probably also concede that it is not entirely justified, that a lot of other people would suggest making changes to improve the…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 07:54 PM
5

Exactly…. Just like Richard reeves
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:54 PM
2

Lmaoooo this made me LOL . What an analogy. A quote from a show I liked , Archer, “ karate ? The Dane Cook of martial arts” I guess now may saying will be …. You mean the Richard reeves of ??
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:54 PM
15

You’ll blame anyone but yourselves
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:11 PM
104

Heat a joke…. Feminist have pushed these boys to be very angry and they retreat into online spaces only to then be berated by feminists yet again
/r/MensRights15/07/25 04:13 AM
77

One step closer to totalitarianism
/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:39 AM
5

What industry
/r/MensRights13/07/25 10:09 PM
53

Hey probably got rid of you and promoted her to avoid any legal trouble.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 09:52 PM
6

Read the work of Daniel Amneus. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=R9vR1isqDo6D528I Read his books The garbage generation The case for father custody
/r/MensRights12/07/25 08:09 AM
12

Just to add some perspective, let us not forget that harvards soccer team had their season cancelled a few years ago, because they were rating the girls …. Well wtf is this ? Is it not the same thing on a much larger scale ?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 07:00 AM
7

Itd be interesting to find out
/r/MensRights10/07/25 05:18 AM
21

I meant the security
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:20 PM
82

I’m amazed they did anything about this
/r/MensRights09/07/25 08:40 PM
47

They are invisible
/r/MensRights09/07/25 07:24 PM
9

Unless he’s going to address how they are discriminated against, unfair funding, gender specific scholarships, then anything he says will mean nothing
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:23 AM
9

It was always a pretence
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:07 AM
55

This is very similar to how adhd over diagnosis lead to the drugging of boys for the crime of exhibiting normal male behaviour
/r/MensRights08/07/25 03:16 AM
87

This will create far more misogynists than you can imagine
/r/MensRights08/07/25 03:13 AM
16

Exactly. Whenever you suppress sometthing it metastasizes. Any sooner and sooner, the definition of misogyny will become even more ambiguous this indicted more and more innocent people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/25 03:11 AM
108

This is another example of suppression. The more they suppress the more “angry men” they will create.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/25 04:43 AM
27

I’m actually shocked that there were any ramifications for this
/r/MensRights06/07/25 08:03 AM
89

Ya this is inappropriate and a violation of your privacy. Check out a website called medical patient modesty, and perhaps write to them to have your story shared.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 05:30 PM
18

“The War Against Boys” - CH Sommers
/r/MensRights04/07/25 07:47 PM
1

Congratulations
/r/MensRights04/07/25 05:34 AM
22

A key take away here is when an “influencer” like Andrew Tate says things that can be perceived as negative about women, we sound the alarm for fear how of it may effect them. When a woman writes songs like this, there isn’t the slightest bit of concern for how the well being of society’s boys and men may suffer
/r/MensRights04/07/25 04:00 AM
15

That word doesn’t mean anything anymore
/r/MensRights03/07/25 09:44 PM
8

When you actually look at the founders of this ideology, and its political movement, I don’t know that you be so keen to support the few people you see as good apples.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/25 07:22 AM
70

You support feminism, because you think it’s an egalitarian philosophy, it is not. Do more research
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/07/25 03:30 AM
5

It’s funny because the complaint about an imaginary gap of about 30%, but are in complete denial about the very real data that show they benefit from a gap of 20%
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:02 AM
4

This has been the case for decades.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:00 AM
61

It’s ironic how, it’s considered emotional labour for them, when they talk about their problems and go through feelings , but it’s somehow also emotional labor for them when we talk about our problems and go through emotional distress( mankeeping) …🤔. Somethings not adding up here lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/25 09:27 PM
154

The claim that women live under constant tyranny and existential threat is pretty laughable. Whenever catastrophe strikes they are the first to be secured and provisioned for
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 03:40 PM
5

He’s an idiot . His claims are bogus, and he actively denies the root of the problem
/r/MensRights27/06/25 02:50 PM
48

Feminism is not compatible with any sort of male advocacy. People like you would be better off calling yourself an egalitarian
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/25 04:20 AM
23

I always find it funny how women blame men for war, yet so much of the US involvement in the Middle East was done with the intnet of spreading feminist ideology
/r/MensRights26/06/25 10:18 PM
11

Human doing vs human being
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:34 PM
6

Of course that’s the language they would use to obfuscate the reality of it. Men die by every disease more than women, shouldn’t they have their own facilities to focus on their own needs? Of course that’s at the bottom of the priority list, and yet they wonder why men don’t go to the doctor more
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:33 PM
50

An issue that does affect women more ?? Ya… there a litany of data to disprove her claim. And this just disproves the myth that women have no power and that it is “men who set up the system” . Clearly here a woman, with an opportunity to acknowledge these things but instead puts them by the wayside.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/25 04:23 AM
1

Just to further discredit this nonesense, and for anyone else who would like to look up the CDC’s definition of “sexual violence”… the include unwanted sexting…. You read that right. Text messages are sexual VIOLENCE. Are you kidding me ? No wonder these numbers are so inflated . It’s about as credible as the wage gap myth. Further proving my point about the credence of this book
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:47 AM
1

Btw, this has already been addressed in the video I mentioned. They just fiddle with the definition of rape to get that 1/4 number.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:37 AM
1

Classic rebuttal, yet when you guys suffer at your own hands no one ever seems to point it out. You should see what goes on in women’s prisons LOL
/r/MensRights26/06/25 03:36 AM
19

Dissenters will be silenced
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:57 AM
1

That’s also my favourite statistic because it’s completely fabricated . The actual number is 1/50 https://youtu.be/lNsJ1DhqQ-s?si=68XsPjrA8CML_1OC It’s also funny how we have specific laws protecting women from such disdainful actions yet none for those who lie, and destroy the lives of innocent men. Btw, if you want to know who is actually most at risk of rape, its men who end up in US federal prisons
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:30 AM
12

Care to share ? I have an idea give what Heather MacDonald said in this podcast. https://youtu.be/ZpJyvhOGea4?si=eumzlDqLaqSRDjuD
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:05 AM
91

Schrödinger’s feminist
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:45 AM
85

Funny little side note. In undergrad we had to do an assignment, on a group of people who may be excluded from therapy. I asked to pick men, and was told no, they are a “privileged group” pick someone else …. LOL the irony
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:39 AM
209

Loool haven’t people been saying for decades that “girls mature quicker “ now suddenly brain development is an excuse for their crimes ?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 12:24 AM
5

He covers it in the book. Much of what we believe today is a complete falsehood. Even the discourse about voting rights.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:26 PM
6

If you’re referring to escaping a physical catastrophe, then you’re actually right but it serves my point. They could not escape safely on their own due to their own physical short comings. When men prioritize themselves, the ladies didn’t fair very well. When people didn’t care to offer your protection, suddenly you didn’t do so well on your own.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:25 PM
7

When presented with evidence contrary to people’s beliefs, ignorant people just bury their heads in the sand.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:18 PM
6

Say you haven’t read the book, or any history for that matter, without saying it directly. He dispels all these myths if you care to know the truth but I doubt you do. Women have always been first in line for safety and provision. Sorry to burst your bubble of delusion .
/r/MensRights25/06/25 10:14 PM
30

It’s only when it affects them that they care
/r/MensRights25/06/25 02:54 PM
38

It’s always just about getting more and more privileges at men’s expense
/r/MensRights24/06/25 04:33 PM
1

Social media is also filled to excess with man bashing. To deny this would be absurd also. Fatherlessness is an insult to women…… This is beyond narcissism. To suggest that you’re the ones truly suffering from this. Do you think if anyone other than yourself. Also… why does fatherlessness occur ? Perhaps because of the changes feminists have made to the legal system. Starting in 1870. Prior to that father custody was automatic and mandatory. Almost no kid grew up without a dad.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 03:26 AM
3

I find posts like this indicative as to what people think of us. Rather than coming here to contribute to the conversation about how society treats men and fatherhood, people come here to dump more of their problems on us. My slogan is “ the only time people come knocking at our door is when they have a problem for us to solve” You should look into how the legal system a feminists have engineered a situation which basically guarantees sole and automatic mother custody following divorce before yo…
/r/MensRights24/06/25 01:12 AM
11

majority
/r/MensRights24/06/25 01:08 AM
3

Legal reform has to come first. Read the work of Daniel Amneus
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/25 08:23 PM
16

Welcome to Canada where selling sex is legal but purchasing it is not
/r/MensRights23/06/25 02:46 PM
82

I’m completely apathetic to them now. Even my own family members. I have cut a lot of them off. Then actively support the negativity that goes our way. Why should I care about them ? Recommended reading : The Privileged Sex , Martin Van Crevald
/r/MensRights23/06/25 04:51 AM
1

Is homosexuality toxic ? Is being what you innately are toxic ? ? Like Jesus Christ man
/r/MensRights22/06/25 08:15 PM
66

Taking a picture of a guy sleeping is probably the creepiest thing you can do
/r/MensRights21/06/25 04:20 AM
95

Look this won’t be popular, but this “female loneliness” problem was caused by the male loneliness one. Whatever happens to males, will eventually have an effect on women. Go read the misandry bubble by Imran Khan ( pseudonym)he talks about due to the growing societal misandry, more men will sequester themselves which will eventually leave women on their own. The situation that is now starting to effect women is the cause of what we have been doing to men for decades. The sad part is that as a r…
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:43 AM
5

This is the classic , “ we can only focus on men, once we’ve taken care of women”
/r/MensRights20/06/25 05:38 PM
4

You should be far more worried about the discrimination against boys in education, higher education, the workplace, government funding, the legal system, and policies that are being passed to further exacerbate the problem. All of it is directed negatively against males. If videos like this are your priority, then I can’t change your mind, but I think you’re deeply misguided. There are far bigger fish to fry. Post like this also fall into the category of “people only knocking at our door when th…
/r/MensRights20/06/25 04:59 PM
3

So now women objectifying themselves is a problem for MRA’s. So the goal of MRA’s should not be to focus on the problems that affect men, but on how men ought to perceive and treat women ?? Are you serious ? As if there aren’t enough people talking about this .
/r/MensRights20/06/25 04:18 PM
1

Well time will reveal all the hidden details
/r/MensRights18/06/25 10:23 PM
1

Well I hope I’m wrong, but I think you’ll be surprised
/r/MensRights18/06/25 10:12 PM
10

Wherever you give them a micro phone, they do the same thing
/r/MensRights18/06/25 03:16 PM
9

I don’t even have words for this. So it’s emotional labor when they go through emotions and complain to us. But when we go through emotions and complain to them it’s man keeping ? So they complain when they feel things, then they complain when we feel things ? All they do is whine constantly .
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:50 PM
7

It’s funny how the zeitgeist has shifted since trump got elected. The same people who denied men have any probelms at all, are suddenly telling us what all the solutions are….. hilarious
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:20 PM
7

For more enlightening rhetoric, I refer you to Daniel Amneus . I think his books are must reads. The Case for Father Custody -The Garbage Generation https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=ux-2DX3jDVxD9wPa
/r/MensRights16/06/25 08:13 PM
6

You might want to look into the work of Daniel Amneus. I think he is one of the most important figures that people have never heard of
/r/MensRights16/06/25 03:13 PM
43

These are perfect examples of what the woman’s “movement” has become. Male hate is entrenched in it, and yet they wonder why a younger generation of men are turning away from them. What I found funny about the “ no uterus no opinion” is that they seem happy to decide what the man should be doing with his money, and that invariable means giving it to her for a decision she has unilateral power over. No uterus no opinion, and yet the person who has no opinion must take all the financial responsibi…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 02:50 PM
86

Every year lol
/r/MensRights16/06/25 05:23 AM
3

Does this article propose any changes that have to be made ?
/r/MensRights16/06/25 03:48 AM
5

And of course the programmers who added this feature are men …
/r/MensRights15/06/25 09:42 PM
3

This made me laugh 😂
/r/MensRights15/06/25 04:08 AM
23

Some of the most aggressive affirmative action in the west
/r/MensRights14/06/25 08:35 PM
1

It’s where the rich send their kids for reason. All girls schools and all boys schools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/25 02:55 PM
57

I saw an ad for bumble that was promoting the idea of not being shy and making a move. The video in the background was of a woman saying how much fun she was having dating and she got to try all these new things and go to all these new places. Ya I’ll bet that does sound fun, especially when someone else is paying for it HA
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:25 AM
86

Pay attention to how people treat their enemies, because once they redefine you from friend to enemy, that’s the treatment you’ll receive. Believe it or not, women were not always allies of the lgbt movement. Just consider that things can certainly change again.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 03:56 AM
5

Exactly …. “Well they’re just leaving, that’s their fault”. Ya and that says everything about women , not us. They vote with their feet, and they run away from places that are not operating in their best interests.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:08 PM
5

This is why you don’t do that
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:05 PM
30

A small dent in the zeitgeist. Hopefully many more to come
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/25 04:19 AM
23

A funny symptom of how they are waking up even in this leftist shithole is how I saw a post on a law school subreddit, where a guy is shocked to find out that not all law professors grade “blindly”….. shocker… gee wonder whose getting special brownie points 🤔
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:55 PM
1

Sorry for my lousy spelling
/r/MensRights10/06/25 10:02 PM
3

Daniel Amneus, the case for father custody. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=pwcWmAQLHEXbZwsi
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:57 PM
1

May I suggest a book ?
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:51 PM
4

I made this point to another commenter in a different post. My point was don’t be fooled.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 08:18 PM
2

I understand the idea as an easier way to get the ball rolling. What I meant is that custody is far more important than time off. If this works as a useful Segway, than great, but I wanted to point out what really matters
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:25 PM
9

There focus should be on improving father CUSTODY first. In my humble opinion
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:15 PM
1

Are you being sarcastic ?
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:31 PM
14

This totally subverts the root of the problem. The more research you do on nearly every issue, all roads lead back to what Erin Pizzey calls the evil empire.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:39 PM
2

That’s a more dismal conclusion than I was suggesting
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:20 PM
3

This is also my point. Why would you want help from the people that already have been hurting you ?
/r/MensRights10/06/25 03:03 PM
2

Im talking before university as there are none available, other than some for women only. Im Canadian . Everyone i have met who had wealthy parents have sent their kids to single sex private schools, and all of them have illustrious careers. Ask yourself. As a parent, would you sacrifice your child’s wellbeing just for status? As CH Sommers talks about in her book, single sex schools actually prevent gender stereotyping and prevent kids from picking career paths and subjects based on their sex. …
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:25 AM
6

All boys private schools and all girls private schools are the choice of the wealthy, and a choice that increasingly only they have. Tell me, why would rich parents who have the choice to send their sons and daughters ANYWHERE, send them to single sex schools ? Obviously because they are the best choice for their children. But that was not a solution even mentioned in the book I was thinking of. I do believe it will inevitably be adopted though. Probably only in 40years
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:05 AM
83

“Why don’t men go to the doctor more often??” 🙃🙃
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:00 AM
3

If you’d like, I would recommend a book that has a much more effective solution that has proven itself across time and cultures. It is a panacea to almost all the misandry in society. But only if you’re interested . I’m promise, I personally have nothing to gain from showing you. I wish someone had shown me sooner
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:48 AM
8

I get this type of answer a lot around here, and I get it. I used to be more optimistic , but I’ve just seem to many patterns unfold over and over again. I’d love it if this works don’t get me wrong, and I understand how skepticism comes off as pessimistic. But we also have to be realistic. To phrase it less harshly, my motto is “ let’s wait and see” . Time reveals all the hidden details.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:46 AM
5

If you want something that is much more proactive, gender segregated education is a much better and easier solution to a lot of this, however no one seems to want to touch that idea with a ten foot pole. CH Sommer talks about this in her book “the war against boys” Even just putting these measures into place now, won’t actually make a dent in our culture until a least a decade later . There is a lag between policy and social change .
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:44 AM
16

I never mentioned the goodness of her heart. Yes this is a good sign that the ball is STARTING to roll, however it is by no means a miracle solution to any of these problems. That would truly be naive . Plus there will be tons of resistance along the way, both explicit and implicit.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:41 AM
24

I think we’ll only start seeing real progress in another decade at least. Probably two. I think she is just using this as platform to get elected considering it became obvious to everyone why trump won the election. My point is politicians can talk a good game, but until you actually see things change, you shouldn’t hold your breath.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:31 AM
66

It’s more platitudes with no follow through. I’m not buying the shtick
/r/MensRights10/06/25 01:02 AM
1

I find it pretty ironic. Two generations ago, pride was viewed as disgusting. Now it has been fully embraced for 1 generation. You are also now seeing the beginning of mens problems becoming the focal point of attention. It is also disdain. Two generations from now everyone will say “ I’ve always supported men, and men’s mental health. Who would ever oppose it?” Ha! It’s also pretty funny that they overlap on the same month. And while one has now peaked, the other is beginning to rise. Perhaps a…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 11:41 PM
31

If they can’t debate you they insult you
/r/MensRights09/06/25 09:10 PM
24

Pay attention to how people treat their enemies, because once they redefine you from friend to enemy, you’ll get the same treatment
/r/MensRights09/06/25 05:11 PM
46

I love how they casually sneak in that holding them back a year is an acceptable solution despite the fact this is purely speculative. CH Sommers has already proposed better solutions, gender segregated classrooms. I see this as much more effective than holding someone back a year. The undertone certainly is still bent in the favor of feminists. “Shutting the labels in their rooms angrily” . Ya as if women would want to participate in such a society if the roles were reversed
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/06/25 08:27 PM
3

What exactly does this change ?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:29 PM
4

Pretty soon , they won’t have much of our sympathy left
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:06 PM
27

Shouldn’t be surprised
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:32 AM
1

Maybe everyone else should as well ? LOL . You know like the people around the men who are exhibiting these symptoms
/r/MalePsychology06/06/25 05:10 PM
12

Thanks for your help
/r/MensRights06/06/25 01:00 AM
10

Thanks for your help
/r/MensRights06/06/25 01:00 AM
5

You are wrong. Idk about small towns, but in major cities this is actually more common than people think.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 03:47 AM
21

Lmaooo women rate men all the time, I don’t see anyone telling them to stop. First thing a girl does after introducing her boyfriend to her friends is ask them what they think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 02:58 PM
41

It’s hilarious how they don’t connect the dots between the preferential treatment they give girls, and the fact that boys fall behind
/r/MensRights04/06/25 03:14 AM
41

Body count verifier ?
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:50 PM
41

Nothing could be further form the truth statistically
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:34 AM
5

Custody and child support are completely different. If he has custody, why is he paying child support ? Once the child is under his provision he should not be garnishing his pay check for someone else
/r/MensRights31/05/25 03:15 PM
5

Yup. I work as a server in a different country. I see tons of single Ukrainian women who come and giggling and order drinks, having the time of their lives. The male kin probably aren’t so lucky
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:51 PM
57

I have been waiting for them to wake up for 20 years…. I’m not holding my breathe
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/05/25 04:36 AM
7

Can we put a stop to posts like this ?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 10:57 PM
2

Yes. I’m not claiming to have answers in the short term. But maybe with the right resources you could come up with them. There is a saying , if someone points out a problem, they are probably right, but if someone says they have the solution, they are probably wrong LOL. My suggestion ? Read the books.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 09:39 PM
2

I agree we are a long way away from progress, and believe it or not, informing yourself is half the battle. Action without Knowledge can actually make things worse.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:56 PM
17

If you are sincere, then I will point you in the right direction. Before anyone attempts to fix a problem, they must understand the problem. Here are a set of books to read: The War Against Boys - CH Sommers The Boy Crisis - Warren Farrell
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:49 PM
2

Read “the case for father custody “ by Daniel Amneus
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:13 PM
1

Name checks out
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 09:22 PM
1

It seems like every week there is one of these…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/05/25 08:34 PM
17

Such a suggestion for anyone else would be considered tremendous systemic discrimination. Imagine saying this about homosexuals ?
/r/MensRights26/05/25 08:23 PM
2

I just got into an argument with someone over book recommendations so I’ll probably just irritate another person LOL here goes. If you want to know more about this topic here are two books that would really help. The Boy Crisis - Warren Farrell The War Against Boys -CH Sommers
/r/MensRights26/05/25 12:22 AM
2

Some things you have to experience to fully understand
/r/MensRights25/05/25 11:45 PM
1

Warren Farrell is a very left leaning guy, and so is CH Sommers. She’s a registered Democrat. Both of them have advocated for policy change. My point with the democrats effect on black people is that people think of them as the good guys who tried to help, and the republicans as the one who ignore them. Well by trying to help, their efforts did not have the intended outcome and I am certain the same thing will happens here. But only time will tell. I’m well aware of how republicans have also con…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 11:35 PM
1

We want the same things right ? That’s why we are here right now? Mens rights? A better world for males, for the mistreatment to stop ? Yes . Me too. Reeves is focus is just more feminism in disguise. I know it’s tempting to believe that he will solve or make progress on these things but he won’t. And I won’t be fooled. I can’t think of anyone who has been more accommodating to women and helpful to there cause than Warren Farrell. Literally sat on NOW( only man ever to do so) and that wasn’t eno…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 11:02 PM
1

He hasn’t done anything. Literally nothing . He has just talked about it in public, in a way that feminists approve of . This is of no use to us. You know what did bring men’s rights into the public eye ? Trump winning the election. People realized men are a group of people they cannot ignore anymore. Go read this: https://quillette.com/2024/11/06/the-revenge-of-the-silent-male-voter-trump-vance-musk/ Richard reeves starts off every speech with the same crap.. “ I must first ignore the blalahaha…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 03:49 PM
31

I know right ? How about acknowledging why they left in the first place
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/25 04:14 AM
21

Look at the data on fatherless homes vs single dads, this is clearly the opposite ….
/r/MensRights24/05/25 09:03 PM
2

Cuz they’re the ones who are disproportionately represented among social ills right ?
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:11 PM
25

You give girls preferential treatment in school and in work and you expect there to be a litany of “economically viable” men. 🤯
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:09 PM
8

And it’s a shock as to why people don’t want to be around them
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:02 PM
12

This is what is meant by misandry. This is also an example of women will side with each other no matter what. They have no clear sense of right and wrong.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 04:08 PM
29

Ya I saw this. I hope eventually we see a backlash from that feminist shit hole
/r/MensRights22/05/25 08:32 PM
33

THIS
/r/MensRights22/05/25 03:32 AM
136

They’re not…. There is a slight lean right among Gen z, but women lean FAR further in one direction ( left) then boys do in the other. Why does no one think this is a problem?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 08:18 PM
20

Yup. The myth that it was once about equality is still so pervasive .
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:39 PM
99

Politicians are panicking that men are withdrawing from marriage , in accordance with their own interests ( self- preservation)
/r/MensRights19/05/25 06:25 PM
2

This is the guy who actively denies there is ANY discrimination against men and boys. He also completely denies everything written by CH Sommers in her book “the war against boys” and then his solution for helping out ia to hold them back a year in school….. there is a reason they stopped doing this btw for people who were struggling academically…. Its doesn’t work. Everyone this guys name comes up , I say the same thing. He is NOT our friend. Nothing more than a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Don’t …
/r/MensRights19/05/25 01:21 AM
5

Regarding your comment on the backlash ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 02:44 PM
7

Care to elaborate
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 02:34 PM
23

And feminists were the ones who created the bureaucracy that is currently discriminating against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/25 04:56 AM
127

You won’t see a documentary about this any time soon
/r/MensRights17/05/25 12:58 AM
11

If only more people would
/r/MensRights16/05/25 10:00 PM
29

I hear other mild variations of this. Parents will say , we want a son first so he can “protect “ his sister. And I’m sure they will have no reciprocal obligation for her. Is he okay with any of this btw? Does he not have his own priorities in life such as his own safety and provision ? Is he not statistically the one who is at a greater risk of literally everything ?
/r/MensRights16/05/25 09:29 PM
8

Ya it would also be better if universities weren’t pumping out these feminist therapists to begin with tbh
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:23 AM
5

Hence why they are not compatible
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:14 AM
17

Most therapists are just another arm of the feminist machinery.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 06:09 AM
32

No one is suprised
/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:59 AM
14

Claire Lehman has also perpetuated the myth of “femicide” so I’m not sure how much we want to endorse her content here .
/r/MensRights15/05/25 03:52 AM
2

Trust me, I grew up in one . I know. I recommend you read his books: the garbage generation, the case for father custody
/r/MensRights14/05/25 09:46 PM
4

Go look up the work of Daniel Amneus . Patriarchy = western civilization, Japan, the modern world Matriarchy = the Stone Age , the ghetto , the barnyard. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=Tkin9TwkbWHMsJGh
/r/MensRights14/05/25 09:27 PM
9

Read Christina Hoff Sommer’s “The War Against Boys”
/r/MensRights14/05/25 09:00 PM
3

Whether the actual biological father or the mother who committed the act of infidelity should be held responsible is another discussion
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 01:24 AM
5

I would think it’s a violation of the contract,
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 01:16 AM
11

I don’t think they had paternity tests back then lol. This is also why adultery among women was so particularly frowned upon and chastised
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/25 12:59 AM
1

This was the thinking of the Victorian era. Marriage was a man exchanging resources and a better quality of life for a woman who would give him a meaningful role in reproduction
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 10:50 PM
14

In the Victorian era this was actually the case. Where a woman who had kids outside of marriage was solely responsible for them. Marriage was to establish paternity, which makes the husband responsible for the children that are created within that union
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 10:07 PM
47

The misandry bubble talks about this and how it is the biggest resources misallocation in the history of our species. We are literally taking resources away from people who are being productive and giving them to people who are a drain on the system. According to the misandry bubble, all resource misallocations correct themselves after enough time passes. He argues that this correct will happen “many decades “ after 2020 and that it will be “one of the most turbulent events in the history of our…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:13 AM
10

If you would like to support us, we are happy to have you. You could be a very powerful force in advocating for us, especially considering you belong to a group of people who have also suffered societal mistreatment. At the hands of the police, the legal system, the education system, the corporate world , unfair laws, and issues around marriage . The parallels are uncanny. Unfortunately far too many homosexual men choose to go the other route and berate men as if they were a problem in society a…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:44 AM
11

Get this none-sense out of here you huckster
/r/MensRights13/05/25 02:05 AM
18

I wish the changes in our society would be that fast.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:44 PM
88

I’d love to see any man rehired after he was proven innocent . Where as this was woman was guilty, and apparently that’s okay.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 10:42 PM
2

No I meant her getting punished by her employer
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:41 PM
50

Usually when people say “ in most of the cases I know” …. What they mean is they asked 5 people around them. This is both one sided, and not representative of the whole picture. This is what research is supposed to help with, however it also has its flaws.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:06 PM
22

I meant that the perpetrator faced any consequences
/r/MensRights08/05/25 04:04 AM
19

I almost don’t believe this
/r/MensRights08/05/25 02:35 AM
5

I see. And we end up being the generation, that pays the price for forgetting the lessons of our ancestors.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 12:40 AM
9

Short answer ….. it’s not
/r/MensRights07/05/25 12:06 AM
3

I don’t really have time for sarcasm
/r/MensRights06/05/25 10:02 PM
105

They are never happy
/r/MensRights06/05/25 02:11 PM
2

So much for “consent”
/r/MensRights05/05/25 08:03 PM
21

“Why are men abandoning college ????” 🙄
/r/MensRights05/05/25 07:43 PM
10

My point is all these things where men are presented as threats to society are caused by men who grew up fatherless. Most men grow up fatherless because the courts grant custody to the mom. This is the problem to address.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 02:12 PM
17

If they wanted to halve anything, and pretty much all socials ills, they would be trying to reduce the feminist influence on child custody matter. If father got custody more often, fewer kids would end up as delinquents, and hurt other members of society. Until that happens any other effort will be as effective as trying to use a bucket to offload water from a boat with a hole in it. Until you patch the hole, you can keep scooping all you like, the water is just going to keep coming in.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/25 06:51 AM
3

Genius. You forgot the final step. Once they are numerically represented enough, they do everything to push men out, and prevent men from entering further. They actively exclude men. Then they demand subsidy to keep it afloat after it stops producing the value it once did
/r/MensRights04/05/25 06:37 AM
14

Don’t trust it
/r/MensRights01/05/25 04:07 PM
6

Not buying it. The VAWG legislator was already propagandistic and based on lies. So why would we believe this was made in good faith
/r/MensRights30/04/25 08:05 PM
11

It’s not young men that have to be taught. It’s society that needs to learn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/25 09:35 PM
1

How can this be changed ?
/r/MensRights26/04/25 05:02 PM
5

My hope is I live long enough to see the day that we erect a statue in Daniel Amneus’ honor. The true godfather of men’s rights
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:29 PM
4

It was particularly because of their unyielding attitude towards mother custody. Read the work of Daniel Amneus . He argues that mother custody is the lynchpin of the feminist program. Warren Farrell even acknowledges some of his work. Read the garbage generation, and the case for father custody. It will completely change how you view things, if you’re uninformed. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=H00279RuzO_qBKQa
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:03 PM
3

Nelson Mandela was also labelled a terrorist until the very end
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:01 PM
2

There should be laws against this.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 10:04 PM
20

100%
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:05 PM
22

Exactly. It’s not because they want to participate, it’s because they want to control us.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 04:05 PM
45

Everywhere men go… they have to follow them. Everything men build for themselves, they have to nudge their way in. This is what happened in universities and now look. The same will happen here eventually. For all the talk about how men’s spaces aren’t popular… ya ? Well why are women always desperate to break into them.
/r/MensRights25/04/25 02:27 PM
121

Why can’t they just leave us alone
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/25 05:55 AM
39

Exactly . Are we going to do anything to even teach people about this bias ? Just look at what happened to Movember
/r/MensRights24/04/25 09:51 PM
132

When people ask “why are women being blamed for men’s problems ? They have no power” Ya…. And wtf is this ?
/r/MensRights24/04/25 09:07 PM
48

The trajectory that November has taken is proof that when women take part in an institution, they manipulate it for their own benefit. Don’t believe claims that they are “trying to help” It’s also hilarious that literally no one can see how a work of fiction should not be influencing public policy. This is only going to make things worse over the coming decade, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the block is severe. Exactly what? I don’t know.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:58 AM
8

This is one thing that grinds peoples gears here, is how you smuggle women’s problems into the conversation… what is the title of the group ? Let’s focus on that. Plenty of other people and spaces are talking about women. Almost none are talking about men. So why even make this post ? Trust me when I say, there is far more hatred for men then there is for women. I don’t see you telling them to calm their hatred down … only us.
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:47 AM
2

According to Linda Farstein( head of the sexual crimes unit of manhattan ) they are about 40%
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:14 PM
7

They did this to themselves
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/25 11:22 PM
2

Pretty soon everything is going to be recorded anyway and we will live in as close to a surveillance state as possible
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:21 PM
8

May I also add, “the garbage generation” and “the case for father custody” by who I consider to be the “Malcolm x” of men’s rights: Daniel Amneus
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:45 AM
2

“Why don’t you have a seat right thereeeeee….”
/r/MensRights17/04/25 08:56 PM
17

Judge by our worst, ignored for our best.
/r/MensRights17/04/25 08:48 PM
1

And if men started their own, it would be taken down immediately…. For the “safety of women of course” . Absolutely disgusting and ima pick and tired of no one doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 04:20 AM
58

Trust me, most people don’t want to approach them at the gym. They want to avoid them completely .
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:10 AM
1

I’m sorry, I’m not sure I understood your question ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:28 AM
5

I was raised by a single mother, trust me I know what it’s like very well. This issue is very close to my heart. If that is a point that reeves makes, then he should acknowledge that who changed the system to be so one sided in the first place. It was feminists. But he doesn’t. So once again, another lie. If you listen to Amneus’ work, your entire perspective on this will change, and it will make a lot more sense. It is the equivalent of when in the wizard of oz, people look behind the curtain, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 08:02 AM
13

Well first of all, he lies. ALOT. He actively denies there is any evidence that teachers discriminate against boys in grading . Go check Chris Williams first podcast with him. Now apparently he claims “they are just cherry picked” . He brushes off any suggestion that the gender equity in education act has anything to with boys underachievement. Even though CH Sommers, who has worked on gender issues much longer than he has -initially with her focus being on women- has said it is responsible . Sh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 07:42 AM
4

Richard reeves is not an ally, I’m sorry, people need to accept this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 07:14 AM
13

This is disgusting behaviour . And sadly I can’t almost be certain, none of them got punished .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/25 07:14 AM
17

I can’t picture a funnier sight than a bunch of testosterone driven young men, angry at being mistreated by society , literally rioting and tearing it down, while goof balls like this guy try to calm them down, or get the situation under control by telling these kids not to engage in “toxic masculinity” 😂😂😂😂😂
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/25 05:42 PM
12

That’s what I meant by “integrity”
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:41 PM
77

Are they gunna crack down on the abuse of AWDTSG groups ? And how women have been targeting men ? Of ya ….. they’ll get to that later
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:19 PM
26

The integrity of a field also seems to suffer when women make up a larger portion of it. Look at what’s happening with medicine in the UK, as well as the education system, and now higher education as a whole.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:11 PM
24

This is the clamp down that people talked about post 2020, as political elite have gone into panic mode over more and more men not marrying. This of course will only make it worse
/r/MensRights12/04/25 05:49 AM
250

“If women ran the world !!” The hypothetical that keeps getting proved wrong
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:26 AM
1

Right. I apologize if I misunderstood something you wrote. But it’s seems like the hurdle is getting people to come around to segregated education for boys.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 04:25 AM
4

Regarding your last comment, I don’t see that happening anytime soon.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 05:14 PM
4

Well we’ve been trying to mix them for decades and it’s obviously not helping
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:23 PM
4

Okay. I’ll give it a look.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:54 AM
1

If you want to know about how to promote fatherhood, look no further than the work of Daniel Amneus . Read, the case for father custody. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=xiTl8JJY2j879YI4
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:46 AM
11

Can you elaborate ?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:38 AM
1

Is it a gay novel lol? Or it’s just a bout brotherhood ?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:11 AM
12

You touched on it. As it becomes increasingly female, women feel no reservations about their bigotry towards men. Being in a group of only women is almost always awful. Not only that, but the curriculum itself becomes infested with feminist nonesense. Some of the things I’ve had to read are clearly pieces of feminist propaganda. And women eat it up. And men who question it , are treated as a pariah. Some are even failed by their teachers for having dissenting views. Janice Fiamengo has talked ab…
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:11 AM
5

Is it a novel ? What’s it about
/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:59 AM
7

Okay. Interesting perspective. I find that there is still lots of group work in university’s, and so being in a female heavy field, leads to often being the only male in your group, which for me at least, was not pleasent.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:39 AM
1

Bureaucracy, the feminist weapon of choice
/r/MensRights11/04/25 02:29 AM
67

Until, people see this, the problems will only get worse
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:43 AM
161

Lmaooo I thought they were “useless” ? I thought they were “ obsolete”? I thought women were “the future leaders of our world” ? I thought it was time for men to step aside ?
/r/MensRights11/04/25 01:22 AM
4

I made a post pointing this out before the series even aired , and it was in this very sub. These male teachers will serve as arms of the feminist movement to further indoctrinate boys, much like social workers have been working as quasi-police for feminists in family court for decades
/r/MensRights10/04/25 06:29 AM
4

The importance of a role model when you’re young, is that you can’t decide for yourself, and it primarily serves to keep you out of trouble when you’re young and reckless
/r/MensRights08/04/25 10:27 PM
17

Well, it’s supposed to be the boys father, as a foundation for what a man should be. Then as he reaches adulthood he will Meet other men who can also augment this image and as an adult the boy can decide for himself who he would like to be based on his now mature mental faculties and life experience. That’s what growth is.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 08:54 PM
23

Ya, I’ve heard the origins of it. It was her talking about being abused by a family member, and how sometimes families cover it up and this needs to change. Correct me if I’m wrong I meant back peddling on the part of broader society.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:36 PM
87

And the back peddling begins…..
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:13 PM
15

Same reason gay rights were hated up until a decade and a half ago
/r/MensRights08/04/25 02:10 AM
42

Perfect example of Plato’s allegory of the cave. People staring at shadows on the cave wall , mistaking them for reality
/r/MensRights06/04/25 10:17 PM
38

The WAW( women are wonderful effect) proves quite the opposite. Women only listen to other women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/25 07:09 AM
10

I was thinking exaaaaaactly that
/r/MensRights04/04/25 04:44 AM
54

But remember “misandry annoys…. MiSoGyNy kills!!”
/r/MensRights03/04/25 11:26 PM
37

Is this actually possible ?
/r/MensRights03/04/25 11:02 PM
1

The more you suppress something , the more it metastasizes. Unfortunately I think k it’s a little too late, and even drastic intervention at this point with a genuinely altruistic motive of helping boys will fail - unlike much of the covert feminism we do see . I think it’s only a matter of time before there is some backlash and we all pay the price.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 08:26 PM
7

My point is for OP to show his kids
/r/MensRights03/04/25 04:35 AM
3

What’s funny is that this guy actually gave a talk about why young men are underperforming in life …… why the fuck would anyone listen to a guy that actually advocated for apartheid ????
/r/MensRights03/04/25 03:23 AM
3

Good point. My point was how it will almost certainly be excused. And THIS is exactly why young men have fled university . That prominent academics are allowed to promote this kind of rhetoric
/r/MensRights03/04/25 01:02 AM
17

Show them the red pill by Cassie Jaye
/r/MensRights02/04/25 09:37 PM
3

LOL good guess, but it’s Rob Henderson. He did a talk with Costello so I shouldn’t be surprised
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:55 PM
5

Btw…. This guy has also spoken at events and talks about what the problems are with young men today, and how to fix them . What a fucking joke
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:51 PM
3

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH83L37xTTj/?igsh=eTRzMjB1dnM2cmh6
/r/MensRights02/04/25 07:50 PM
1

Yes . 450k pork chops here. Many in my city.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 07:22 PM
3

LOOOL my parents are Portuguese and I was just talking to a colleague of mine about how I hate it x) ( joking oc)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 03:46 PM
1

My statement is largely true. Sorry, for clarification I am Canadian, and live in a major city, so things might be different where your from. I used the service industry as an example for how pay goes up as the difficulty goes up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 03:28 PM
33

Better question…. Why was this not the public’s reaction to the red pill by Cassie jaye, almost 10 years ago
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/04/25 02:55 AM
8

Lmaoo if “economic abuse” is really a thing, let’s be real, women are the ones guilty of perpetuating it. ….
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:15 AM
2

Lmaoo if “economic abuse” is really a thing, let’s be real, women are the ones guilty of perpetuating it. ….
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:12 AM
3

Here’s my appendage to my previous statement…… and so does the backlash.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 03:50 AM
6

Can someone fill me in on what the actual video s take on the subject was ? Not the comments .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 11:29 PM
22

The acronym HEAL didn’t exist u til like 2-3 years ago. And no they are not the most demanding, that’s exactly why people are not compensated as highly. Demanding jobs= high compensation. That’s how you get people to do it. I work in the service industry. The higher the traffic and the higher the food quality/experience, the more money you will make, but also, the more stress it is. Laid back restaurants with cheap food and low traffic are easy to work in, but you won’t bring home much. High end…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 11:12 PM
21

I’m also skeptical
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 08:30 PM
17

And the clamp down begins …..
/r/MensRights31/03/25 08:17 PM
15

Language inflation is a real thing if they keep going at this pace, in a decade or two that word will mean nothing and they’ll be the ones suffering because of that. It’s the story of the boy who cried wolf
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:37 PM
7

Yes it’s true. I’m Canadian btw, so I’m very disconnected to what going on at a federal level , let alone state level in your country. However, each passing year, the number of people who mock men will slowly shrink, and the number of people who support them wills slowly grow, until the paradigm has completely flipped. Right now the starting point is more like 10:1 LOL, that’s why it feels like it’s taking so long. Universities and how they are radicalizing young women are not helping at all. Th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/25 01:42 AM
2

Interesting take
/r/MensRights31/03/25 12:11 AM
4

Ya an actually equivalent would be charging women for masterbating. This is the kind of stuff that drives men further away from the left. Btw, men are already punished and held responsible for unwanted pregnancy. You are made financially responsible, and thrown in prison for not meeting your financial obligations
/r/MensRights31/03/25 12:07 AM
27

Here is the good thing that came from this, and it is what someone pointed out to me before the election really got going. Now that young men have swung the election, people realize they are a legitimate voting block and cannot be ignored. Moving forward, they will have to have them on the agenda or they will lose, especially Democrats .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 10:03 PM
81

I am just describing what happened. And yes republicans are not the allies of men that some people think they are, but the left have been so much more blatant about it over the past decade and especially this past election.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 09:58 PM
106

He didn’t. Young men voted for him because Kamala and the Democrats doubled down on their anti-male rhetoric. It was a fuck you to them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 09:51 PM
1

Check the work of Daniel Amneus
/r/MensRights29/03/25 07:57 PM
3

Sorry, can you clarify your comment, I’m not sure I understood
/r/MensRights28/03/25 10:04 PM
5

LOL also a place on the podium
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:37 PM
1

We all kind of know that there is no real misogyny. These boys are reacting to the horrible pressure they are being put under. You more you suppress the worse the backlash down stream will be
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:25 PM
14

Just like in Canada . The UK might be the biggest feminist shithole, but Canada is a close second
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:00 PM
25

I love how for once there is actual resistance towards this sort of thing
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:59 PM
11

Where does all this money come from again ?? Oh right… mens taxes.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 04:48 AM
3

Yes that’s technically true. But another example of what I’m talking about are unsolicited nude pictures. Men love them, women not so much. See what I mean ?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 01:23 AM
7

I’m with you there 100% my guy . Read the work of Daniel Amneus. I wish he was still around today. His books are : The garbage generation, The Case for Father Custody.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 12:52 AM
2

Yes I agree with you that the wording is flawed.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 11:06 PM
7

I always hate how people glorify her, when she clearly is just reiterating the male utility argument. Using men for what women need. Traditionalism is just another form of this. It benefits women , not men.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 10:50 PM
15

I strongly disagree with this.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:55 PM
8

Ya, I agree, there definitely an attempt to try and expose some of these male actors, which I disapprove of. I was referring more to the audiences reaction.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 08:54 PM
38

Ya… here’s the thing. It doesn’t quite work the other way around. The reason a woman breast are popular “eye candy” is because men like seeing naked women. Women don’t actually like seeing the genitalia of strangers. They view it as a threat. This is why movies didn’t expose male genitalia. Just look at the failure of playgirl magazine. It wasn’t women lining up for it, but rather, gay men. I think just like a lot of the very awkwardly forced female leads in Hollywood lately, this will also be a…
/r/MensRights27/03/25 07:45 PM
22

Ya . Exactly , I have no problem with keeping women’s bathrooms only for womne, as long as they also keep women out of men’s rooms. When will that be on the agenda ? Ya…..
/r/MensRights27/03/25 07:38 PM
14

Apparently these people can’t do anything for themselves
/r/MensRights27/03/25 02:52 PM
96

Daniel Amneus talks about this in his books, the garbage generation , the case for father custody. The black community is the most accelerated version of the feminist project. Once we break the line of male kinship ( fatherhood), we eventually go back to the barnyard, the ghetto, the stone age. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=pBSC2qmOeuRqy1-g
/r/MensRights27/03/25 05:25 AM
31

I’m getting to the root of these issues, and feminism has a lot to do with it. If you think otherwise, you are mistaken I also love how you say this is a men’s space and are keen on telling us what we can and can’t talk about. Go do some research into all the changes that feminists made to the laws and institutions in the west that have resulted in the current state of affairs.
/r/MensRights27/03/25 04:53 AM
25

Don’t forget how the workforce has changed. The more women that enter a field, the more men leave. Then for some strange reason, women seem to be less interested in it….. weird … 🤔
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:41 AM
30

It’s funny because gym historically have been 99% male until recently. And as more women are admitted, the problems begin, the men leave, and they go under . Perhaps they failed because they weren’t necessary at the time, but I’m starting to see how they might be now
/r/MensRights27/03/25 01:22 AM
46

100%. They want to keep their hand in the cookie jar. The funny thing is, with their presence the culture of innovation does not emerge LOL.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 11:37 PM
36

Many leagues are now coed. This is a problem. The problem will only spread. And your post about entry level jobs is another example.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:59 PM
134

You know what I love hearing ? How the reason men’s spaces don’t exist is because they are not “popular”. That they are no fun without women there . HA! Is that why we vote with our feet ? And they leave when women show up ? Cuz they are so fun to be around? And is that why women try so hard to infiltrate men’s spaces when they did exist ? The truth is that feminists shut them all down starting in the 70’s , or forced them to admit women.
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:36 PM
49

First it is ridiculed Then it is violently opposed Then it is accepted as self-evident We have entered into the stage of opposition. People are no longer laughing, they are actively trying to stifle us, which will inevitably fail in the long run. It’s gunna be a rough couple decades boys.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 08:42 PM
15

Further proof that these institutions are absolutely infested. Pretty soon the word misogyny isn’t going to mean anything. It already doesn’t in my eyes.
/r/MensRights25/03/25 04:44 PM
21

LOOOL. Ya, but labelling them terrorists is ??
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 08:22 PM
58

When in doubt… question someone sexual orientation .
/r/MensRights24/03/25 05:13 AM
32

Thankfully because of the proliferation of the internet, it has still spread, and given a long enough timeframe will outpace the propaganda we are seeing such as this “adolescence” film. However I think it will take decades
/r/MensRights24/03/25 04:06 AM
5

Thank you for your effort. Why I guess she right about one thing. She’s willing to acknowledge the difficult cards some men are dealt and how they are shamed just for being…… however she completely denies feminisms ( and women by proxy) are responsible for this. Like hello…. How do you think k this state of affairs came to be the case ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/03/25 03:47 AM
209

It’s very telling that this tale of fiction has proliferated so quickly, and yet the red pill by Cassie Jaye, an actual documentary, was censored and squashed. Dark times we are living in boys.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:34 PM
11

You mean the same guy that called these isolated downtrodden boys terrorists ?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 09:43 PM
20

Let me guess ? More gaslighting
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/25 09:37 PM
9

And this will make the problem 10000x worse. It will only drive them further into the arms of people who will radicalize them. Keep suppressing them and it will keep metastasizing .
/r/MensRights23/03/25 07:03 PM
3

Hence my last sentence.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:06 AM
7

Ya it’s tough. And it also makes you into a pariah. Perhaps share your opinion, in a non combative way. Think of a situation where women are talking about being discriminated against, and perhaps you could include, that hey I think men are discriminated against too sometimes . As benign as that might seem, and can potentially plant a seed that will grow over time. But i don’t know the circles you run in.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 06:06 AM
38

Don’t feel guilty. If you can help spread the word and direct people to some resources to inform themselves, that would be huge. Unless this is a troll post, in which case, please don’t waste our time
/r/MensRights23/03/25 05:56 AM
17

Your last point is very true. It’s been true for every other industry so far. Women seem to think they own something by when they become the majority. What are the long term ramifications for this ?
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:46 AM
13

Hey maybe when they start dating women, they’ll see what we’re talking about …. LOL
/r/MensRights23/03/25 04:21 AM
3

How long before you think they snap
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:23 PM
19

Water is wet
/r/MensRights22/03/25 07:13 PM
36

The more they suppress things like this , the more it will metastasize. I think a huge backlash is inevitable. It blows my mind however that they can’t see this is the result of obvious preferential treatment for girls across every area of life.
/r/MensRights22/03/25 04:54 PM
17

Remember when 1/3 of the countries women went on strike ? Protesting sexism ? Ya….. On this ? Absolute silence.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:57 PM
8

Anti-male bias is so steeped into people’s brains that they hate men for just existing. What next? Breathing is misogynistic?
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:40 PM
3

And people wonder why we are suspicious of “help”
/r/MensRights20/03/25 10:30 PM
32

How about ….. stop discriminating against them ? LOL The timing of this is hilarious, right after that show on Netflix , adolescents, comes out. What a joke. We’ve spent the past two decades being completely invisible to the public, now they care that we’ve become a potential threat. What an effin joke
/r/MensRights20/03/25 09:17 PM
1

Yes LOL. Sorry autocorrect got me
/r/MensRights20/03/25 03:00 AM
10

My point is there is no reason to continue friendship with this person, as inevitable you will also deserve the knoose in their eyes.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 11:05 PM
13

So this is being done to promote higher birth rates, but it’s clearly not working, nor do I think it will work. Besides it may also cause the proliferation of single motherhood as was the case in the black community in the United States. We all know what a disaster this was.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:59 PM
8

Is is this an actual quote ?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:32 PM
31

It’s only a matter of time before someone with this mindset redefines you as one of them and now you are also an enemy.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:04 PM
12

Why would he even apologize ?
/r/MensRights19/03/25 08:00 PM
11

Well also it will discourage infidelity knowing that you will likely be caught
/r/MensRights19/03/25 06:49 PM
56

lol I remember when it was only 1/3 females. Looks like those numbers got pumped
/r/MensRights17/03/25 02:25 AM
5

Well also the issue of fatherlessness which is caused by feminist divorce court laws and lobbying. Elementary school teachers who are men will only act as surrogates and are no replacement for the real thing. It’s just another example of the state expanding to undermine the family. Replace fatherless with male elementary school teachers? You mean so they can further pound the feminist narrative down their throat ? Ya…. No
/r/MensRights16/03/25 09:37 PM
11

Honestly, I say this every time this guy pops up here. He offers no real solution, just endless kowtowing. Don’t expect much. He actively denies any discrimination takes place . LOL, I think we all know that’s not true. He claims we “equalized the school system” and that the “girls won” and then laughs. He implies that boys just need to be “fixed”. He also completely disregards CH Sommers claims in the book “the war on boys”. How could this guy possibly be an ally ?
/r/MensRights16/03/25 08:45 PM
1

Name and profile checks out
/r/MensRights16/03/25 04:18 AM
10

Okay…. Well, talk to your son, let him know he can be open with you about how he is being treated and encourage him to tell you if he is being treated unfairly based on his gender. You may have to make a lot of visits to that school when incidents arise to make your presence known. Do you get what I’m saying ?
/r/MensRights15/03/25 06:22 AM
2

Ya ? I mean this as a term of endearment… are you a loud mouth ?
/r/MensRights15/03/25 06:17 AM
12

The sad part is now that even principles are becoming overwhelmingly women, speaking up won’t do much. We all just make the rules up. And the people running these places are pretty dead set on what is “ fair” and males have no say in that. I think it’s going to be decades, before any real change happens. Are you an outspoken person, assertive person ?
/r/MensRights15/03/25 06:13 AM
17

Ohh but it’s get worse. You just wait till he gets to highschool and college https://youtu.be/5F9rpyCPDjA?si=TsgcemZwC124xj9W Here’s a taste of what he’s in for. And they wonder why men are abandoning these institutions in droves.
/r/MensRights15/03/25 05:54 AM
2

I was using it as a metaphor. Hyperbole was meant to drive home the point. You’d want a warning if you were heading into something dangerous and didn’t know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 07:10 PM
19

Actually, they’re tearing apart the fabric of society….. but that’s a subject for another day.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 08:34 AM
20

They know, they just don’t care, and sweep it under the rug
/r/MensRights14/03/25 06:15 AM
11

Might point is that cuz of trump and people realizing that young men voted for him, I think the dial has started to move slowly. Very slowly, but it’s begun moving. It won’t be decades till actual progress is made, but it’ll happen
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/25 01:06 AM
0

Well I was thinking in the context of work place and educational interactions rather than more intimate ones.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:36 PM
3

Considering they are such a large cohort of the population, the backlash could be immense.
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:29 PM
5

This is an impossible standard considering who we are dealing with . Essentially you have to walk on egg shells 24/7
/r/MensRights13/03/25 09:27 PM
9

An article. It’s shocking how accurate his predictions came to be . It was published in 2010, and there is a follow up to it in 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 08:26 PM
16

Well a line from that article I also found interesting was the accusation that modern me are “appropriating” the suffer of these men. These same people were denying altogether that these men suffered at all, but now the see the utility in their death to bolster an argument regarding male disposability, and so they claim it is a form Of appropriation. A second note is that , this is the same tactic that modern feminists exploit for their selfish purposes. Appropriating the discrimination of women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 07:12 PM
25

That’s one way to look at it. Another one is that it’s also cruel to let them walk into one of those disastrous outcomes. Should you not tell someone to withdraw , from walking into a gas chamber?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 08:28 AM
73

Well one thing that was actually productive, albeit, inadvertently, was men withdrawing from major institutions : the army, academia, the corporate world, marriage, even the dating scene, and other social circles. By leaving in large enough numbers, people actually woke up. As mentioned in the Misandry Bubble, after 2020, the costs of misandry have begun to shift onto women ( particularly liberal feminists) and other members of society ( the political class and social conservatives) So ironicall…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 07:47 AM
28

Well it’s shows how dependent they are on men for their safety. And if they are not willing to comply, then they could very easily find themselves as the ones who are disposable .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/25 07:07 AM
5

The garbage generation - Daniel Amneus The case for father custody - Daniel Amneus The boy crisis Warren Farrell The war against boys - Ch Sommers Is there anything good about men - Roy f. Baumiester The privileged sex - Martin van crevald
/r/MensRights13/03/25 01:07 AM
15

Considering what is being taught at the undergraduate level, it’s no surprise these mental health “professionals” are turning out this way .
/r/MensRights12/03/25 02:13 PM
10

When the establishment feels threatened they double down.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 03:45 AM
14

In an attempt to combat the myriad of statistics that show that men are trailing in society…. They have resorted to just making things up. The one that makes me laugh is that figure that they are 83% of single parents are women….. why is that again ? Oh right , because judges grant mom sole custody, 83% of the time! As per the request of feminists. In the words of Daniel Amneus , judges allow women sole custody, so that they can turn their children into mutiliated beggars, so they can receive su…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 11:58 PM
5

Funny how they did so without any help either
/r/MensRights11/03/25 06:00 PM
3

Even your own mother would rather side with other women than her own son. Tell me again who is biased/sexist.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:07 PM
69

And they’ll get all the help they need while boys have been ignored and continue to be ignored for decades….
/r/MensRights10/03/25 09:03 PM
26

A lot of anti-Indian sentiments have been growing in my own country due to immigration. It’s happened to a lot of other groups in the past, and it looks like they are the ones currently on the chopping block unfortunately. I hope this doesn’t affect your personal life too much, stay strong. 💪🏼
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/25 06:00 AM
1

According to Richard Reeves, this never happens…. Those are just cherry picked…. I think we all know they are not. Until these teachers are fired… nothing will change
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:49 AM
2

https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=nPC3jrqBxE-HS41n Forget YouTube. This guy is in my eyes the godfather of mens rights. Read his books, they’ll teach you more than anyone else.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 04:21 AM
5

There is clearly some miscommunication going on here. I agree going tit for tat, like a tug of war over and issue is not productive. That’s not what I’m trying to do. I brought up attempts because they are used to create the illusion that actually suicide is just as much of an issue among women, it’s just that men’s use more lethal means. This is not true. Women appear to “attempt more” because only failed attempts are classified as attempts, where as successful attempts are classified as suicid…
/r/MensRights10/03/25 03:30 AM
8

Btw, feminists were the one who nudge women into the conversation to suggest they are somehow most adversely affected. Thats where this notion of attempts vs successes came from.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:55 AM
3

Yes that’s my point. But an attempt is only classified as an attempt when the person fails. When they succeed it is not. This is why it appears that women attempt more.
/r/MensRights10/03/25 12:54 AM
402

Attempts are classified as different than successes from what I understand. So a man, who commits suicide, does not count as an attempt. But a woman who does and fails, does count as an attempt. So technically, only failures count as attempts. If successes were also counted as attempts, then men would commit more of them.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 01:33 PM
9

This is the same issues with “hate crimes”. How exactly does one define a particular murder as a “hate crime”
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 08:02 AM
50

Because they hate us ….. ? I don’t think it’s that hard
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/25 07:43 AM
19

I’m also shocked at how these terms “femicide” catch on. We have all the evidence to disprove their existence, and yet the none-sense peddled by academics seems to proliferate through society anyway.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:20 PM
13

So it doesn’t really matter if they are right wing or left wing. Feminist or not. They will still display WAW and have an enormous bias in favor of their own gender.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 05:18 PM
1

It’s just sad to watch this country run itself into the ground
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:40 AM
64

Women’s history month ? What a joke lol. As if we don’t talk about them enough. The reality is that all this stuff should be purged. This is the “fluff” that has made the education system less valuable, and pushed more boys through the cracks
/r/MensRights07/03/25 05:38 AM
40

Maybe if society wasnt shitting on them and discriminating against them , they wouldn’t turn there..
/r/MensRights07/03/25 01:43 AM
17

This is exactly why so many people did not want them in power.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 08:58 PM
30

They already are , but clearly this will make things worse.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:25 AM
1

So what happens to them ?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 08:38 PM
7

Red herring
/r/MensRights03/03/25 09:22 PM
47

Pretty funny how the people who have caused so many of these issues, suddenly claim to have the solutions and our best intentions at heart…. The silver lining behind this pretence, is that eventually these dummies have to acknowledge that these problems exist.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 07:11 PM
8

My point is that eventually some threshold is going to be crossed, and the damage* is going to make them wake up. That might be decades from now
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:18 PM
11

Well if the London riots that were caused by fatherless Chaz’s is any indicator of where the country is headed, someone better do something and fast, otherwise that will look mild compared to what is yet to come.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 05:14 PM
23

What’s ironic is that it seems like I see so many articles or studies out of the UK specifically, that seem to at least in someway address men’s problems, but they are also one the most misandrist countries. It’s like, are they not connecting the dots between their rhetoric, and the absolutely disenfranchised state of the males in their country?
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:04 PM
71

I still remember when people laughed at milo yiannopolous for talking about the “sexodus” of men…. Well, here we are
/r/MensRights03/03/25 04:41 AM
5

Ask most people and they are convinced it’s women who are “ underserved” , and our universities are perpetuating this myth
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:47 AM
1

This is the manifestation of sally miller gearharts ideas, that were perpetuated by the women’s studies department, and has seeped into so many areas. She explicitly said, we should reduce men to 10% of the population just so they can do the jobs women don’t want. This is what we are seeing happen. It is also a reflection of WAW, otherwise known as bias in favor of women. The issues is how these industries maintain themselves once they become female dominated. Doctors, are a funny example if you…
/r/MensRights01/03/25 07:19 PM
1

My I ask what country you are from?
/r/MensRights01/03/25 06:52 PM
3

As much as I would like for that to be the case, it is not. But it is a sign that men are waking up and using their vote to actually stand against some of this stuff
/r/MensRights01/03/25 01:05 PM
14

Funny how this never comes up when we talk about “ Muslim women”
/r/MensRights01/03/25 11:22 AM
3

How do you maintain that majority long term ? Personally, I think that the women’s studies departments, and any adjacent programs need to be dismantled, as they are the epicentre of this nonesense.
/r/MensRights01/03/25 12:04 AM
1

Right, but then we are at the whims of whatever party is in pattern. Subject to change each election cycle. I’m not too familiar with how the political system works. So I ask, is there a way to make long term change ?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 11:31 PM
5

Key word from the article was, for now. My real question, is how can we pull the plug on all this stuff ?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:49 PM
14

The more you suppress something, the more it metastasizes. They will never understand this.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:29 PM
6

As much as this might be a smidge of progress(probably not) …. For many of us, it’s too late. We have entered into our 30 ‘s and never got the proper guidance and now have ended up as drifters. It’s going to be at least a decade, assuming everyone gets on board with this, before the college atmosphere actually changes
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:44 AM
11

Couldn’t be a conflict of interest. A third party wouldn’t change the outcome at all would it ?
/r/MensRights28/02/25 02:23 AM
11

lol I agree with you. I was referencing a show that asked this question in the UK. Them pontificating about this, while we have such events are so ironic to me
/r/MensRights27/02/25 06:53 PM
8

In regards to it being a suspect of the population… I think you’re wrong, I do believe it is the majority. That said, it goes like this. First it is ridiculed, then it is violently opposed, then it is accepted as true.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/25 06:50 PM
133

Makes sense, but of course it won’t be. They’re entitled to their preferences, but men are bigots for having theirs. Remind me again who the privileged gender is.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:45 AM
182

And they ask dumb questions such as “ has the UK become hostile against blokes”
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:03 PM
7

Yup… saw the same thing, and it shows exactly how far we are from any progress
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/25 07:52 PM
18

Yup. Completely blind to all their privileges but hyper vigilant to any potential disadvantage.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:16 PM
31

Nd yet all I have ever heard from my Japanese females friends is how oppressed women are in japan. They wouldn’t know what fair is if it hit them in the face.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:11 PM
9

The more you suppress something, the more it metastasizes
/r/MensRights25/02/25 06:16 PM
28

Well, time reveals all the hidden details. Hopefully you’ll be introduced to terfs soon enough, and then you might rethink things. You’ve also kind of shown everyone here what your intentions were based on. An inability to bond with other men. This is completely irrelevant to the subject at hand - how society treats us. But you e voted worth your feet, which proves our point. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:56 PM
27

And perhaps your new experience as a trans woman will give you some insight into things. Best of luck
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:42 PM
27

Well, clearly you’ve learned nothing.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:36 PM
30

Brilliant response. Stick around here long enough and you’ll see the problems we actually face in society … the list is too long to go over.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:34 PM
56

You are delusion personified
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:21 PM
12

The most self-centred people on earth. Western women
/r/MensRights24/02/25 08:12 PM
15

I used to do swimming lessons. I was raised by a single mom, who would send me to the locker room to get changed by myself. There was a woman who always used to come into the locker room to help her son change. In hindsight, this is so innappropriate , and the other way around would never be tolerated.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 07:26 PM
7

The majority of those men were raised by women… rapists, murderers, thieves, school shooters, are all mostly raised by single mothers.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:15 PM
10

I have always said this about Richard reeves. He is not our friend, and if you think he is, you’re an idiot. The best phrase I have heard to describe him, is controlled opposition. It is a way for the establishment to say they are doing something about the problem, while continuing to make it worse. All under the guise of Richard reeves “expertise” Do not be fooled by this doofus. He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 02:19 AM
-5

You’re suggesting I’m way out of place here right ? Well, I would just like suggest that perhaps men’s issues should be bi-partisan. And that if this subs focus is men and their problems, perhaps the focus should be on them, rather than the favoured political ideology of the sub. I see that most people here believe a left wing approach is what is necessary, but I’d also suggest not letting your political beliefs blind you to potential solutions. That would be dogmatic. I was a lefty too once, an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/25 01:30 AM
-9

You’ll benefit from him a lot more than you will from the doofuses on the left. Sorry to break it to you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 07:10 PM
-23

You’re more likely to shine his shoes …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 07:18 AM
15

It should be a wake up call for you, that if there is going to be any resurgence of men, it’s going to come from the right not the left. This was also a hard pill for me to swallow
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/25 07:16 AM
12

So men are ejected for looking…. When have you ever seen a woman ejected for actually physically assaulting someone ? There is a chasm of difference here, and it’s pretty obvious who is on the best possible side
/r/MensRights20/02/25 04:08 AM
15

Lmaooo isn’t that what fans are supposed to do ? Watch the athletes ?
/r/MensRights20/02/25 04:02 AM
14

This is just patently false. All they have done for 40 years is carve out spaces for women, much of who can came at the detriment of men and they have actively shut down men’s spaces or forced them to include women. This person is dleusional
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/02/25 05:46 PM
104

You know what’s ironic ? Milo Yiannopolous was deplatformed by right wing publication , Brietbart, for condoning pedophilia, when he spoke about his grooming at the hands of an older man. He said it helped him find who he was. This is always brought up when he comes up as an advocate for men and is used to smear us. This article perfectly exposes the hypocrisy. The education system actually tried defending her ? Ya…. And it’s crazy right wingers we should all be worried about.
/r/MensRights18/02/25 03:22 AM
16

Last ones to get funding, first ones to have funding cut
/r/MensRights17/02/25 03:52 AM
1

Ya sure. I don’t know very much about the medical details, which is why I provided the link . Feel free to tell me what you think.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 07:27 AM
1

https://youtu.be/H-O43T29mkE?si=yznFjFX0Rpilqj0k What are your thoughts on this ?
/r/MensRights16/02/25 04:43 AM
4

Also correct
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:28 PM
10

Well they are not even equivalent. Erections and ejaculation would be equivalent to vaginal lubrication, not conception. I’m also amazed by how poor these people’s reasoning skills are.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 07:42 AM
1

So there are just doing this be ironic ?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 06:23 AM
30

So basically they are just doing this get on peoples nerves with no intent of it actually passing ? And for what purpose? To prove that there biology plays a role in reproduction that isn’t completely within our control?
/r/MensRights15/02/25 05:51 AM
53

It’s funny because I’ll I have ever heart about Japan is about how sexist it is to women.. yet not once have any of the Japanese girls I e met ever mentioned this.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 09:01 AM
60

Can someone sue them ?
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:48 AM
332

This is why men have a distrust of female authority figures Edit: it’s also ironic considering how often women have complained about cultures that require a woman be accompanied by a man, and yet when given the opportunity, they do this.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:31 AM
2

When I went to uni I was one of the only guys there Edit: in my classes. My major was psych
/r/MensRights13/02/25 11:25 PM
7

Welcome to our world. Where you get pushed out of your own spaces to accommodate them. I saw what women did to gay bars/night clubs. They destroyed them. Most you go to know are filled with 20 year old girls. This is what they have been to doing to heterosexual men’s spaces for decades. They are currently doing it to gyms, and video games. They have already completely feminized universities and are doing everything to push men out of these spaces.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 06:44 PM
11

Yup. We are our own prison guards in this system, and once we stop complying, we will realize how powerless feminists actually are
/r/MensRights13/02/25 06:03 PM
9

One problem… who is going to corral all these men ?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 05:48 PM
24

Feminism was never about “equality” or fairness…. It was about conferring the privileges and status of a few wealthy men onto most women with out the reciprocal responsibility. As for the advantages women already held over most other men, they never cared and have only sought the further exacerbate them . Gay men were just a pawn in their game, and now that they don’t need you anymore, they are all too happy to lump you into the same pile as the rest of us. Welcome to the trash heap.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 05:44 PM
69

If as your comment indicates, you are homosexual, now is a pretty good time to point out to you that men and masculinity are the sub cultures much like homosexuality was even 30 years ago. Women and feminists are the forefront of a society, and will step on anyone they perceive to be beneath them. Allies included.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:20 AM
10

lol sorry I forgot you’re right.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 03:58 AM
36

This. They won’t listen to us, but they’ll listen to you.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 08:06 PM
4

My dream is the day that this question isn’t even asked because of how absurd it is. Let me put it to you in another way. When I was 4 I had my tonsils removed. Almost everyone in my age cohort looks at me like I’m an alien. “You had your tonsils removed ???? Didnt your doctors know there were other ways to deal with infections ??” People forget but in the 50’s ( I believe) doctors used to recommend preemptively removing children’s tonsils. Everyone had their tonsils removed and it wasn’t weird.…
/r/MensRights12/02/25 07:23 PM
27

I meant that is where the cliche comes from. Making a woman’s word half of a man’s was a cultural asymmetry meant to balance the biological asymmetry of the female imperative( what people here would call gynocentrism)
/r/MensRights12/02/25 12:40 AM
9

This is just biologically false, but then again, they also believed there was no such thing as gender. In any other species , you wouldn’t consider the ejaculation of a mammal to be the beginning of a life, nor would you consider the menstruation as an attempt to start the reproductive process . What would the implications of this even be ? Both intended and unintended
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:56 PM
147

This is exactly why people believe that a woman’s word is worth less than a man’s. This situation right here. This is what accusations of rape are. Tactics for women to extort men, not means for improving women’s safety. remember when they planned on having women’s only uber drivers ? Ya I’m all for it. Get these people away from us. Oh wait ? How is a women’s only uber driver system going to work ? Oh right, it’s not….
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:02 PM
2

You get my point. Androcide, would fall under the larger umbrella of genocide.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 05:25 AM
3

This is exactly why Richard reeves idea of redshirting is so fucking stupid. It’s not that the boys are struggling, it’s that they are being discriminated against by female teachers
/r/MensRights10/02/25 12:26 AM
4

Great. Don’t come bother us .
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:40 PM
14

Pretty funny how they are the ones who are actually following us around and nudging their way into our spaces
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:37 PM
4

Well, if women would like, the males of their tribe could all just keel over and let their neighbours take the women without resistance. Or would they prefer if none of us exist ? Then they could do everything for themselves. Besides, women are always the first to throw a guy in front of the line of fire, usually for her protection. Just look at how men are shamed for not saving a damsel in distress. I’m sorry, I thought we don’t owe you anything ?
/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:27 PM
3

Exactly.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:42 PM
16

We’re all bad, they’re all good remember ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 04:41 PM
5

“Bodily autonomy “ …. Ya good one
/r/MensRights09/02/25 05:35 AM
7

Exactly. But it says a lot about what their intentions are. The axe murder without and axe analogy comes to mind
/r/MensRights08/02/25 07:22 PM
6

I can sum it up even more briefly , with one word in fact Slavery
/r/MensRights08/02/25 06:23 AM
36

The only form of genocide that is considered socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 01:12 AM
1

Ding ding ding !! And the grand prize goes to …
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:56 PM
8

They think their feelings are more important than everything else
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:42 PM
4

Gee…. I wonder what demographic of people might have a problem with that, while also defending their own groups “right” to the same privilege… 🤔
/r/MensRights07/02/25 10:36 PM
40

Essentially men are expected to live for women, and get nothing in return.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:42 PM
7

Yup. Instead they pretend that is has something to do with the boys themselves. It’s sick.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 07:07 AM
9

Exactly. It’s similar with cheating and how younger women cheat more than older women. It’s not because of a change in virtue, it’s because of what available to them.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:55 AM
19

Exactly, female presence ruins the environment and the masculine ethos
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:47 AM
74

Ya I agree. Let’s get girls out of Boy Scouts, girls out of boys sports, and women out of the men’s room
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:42 AM
20

Reeves is too much of a coward to criticize feminists … I despise this about him. I saw an instagram post of Rob Henderson who suggested that there is “already a thumb on the scale” for male applicants at university, but this is not really the case. Yes they will allow some more male students in, but these are for irrelevant subjects, and they get no where near the help that their female counterparts parts get. On top of that the curriculum is riddled with anti-male rhetoric. A friend of mine wh…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 06:18 AM
6

They should is my point, but ya, feminists are too self centred
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:38 PM
1

https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=C4gYABTFbFfjZHu5 Watch this. I’d highly suggest you pick up his books. The garbage generation and the case for father custody. These I think are the most important books for anyone in mens rights
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:12 PM
1

I suggest you get a copy for yourself. There are no new ones , at least I don’t think . No surprise considering your post, and that, what, 80% of publishers are women ? HA ! I’d also recommend you read the work of Daniel Amneus.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 10:08 PM
1

Ya I 100% agree with you. I recently got hold of a book that I would recommend anyone read, it’s called “ the inevitability of patriarchy” by Steven goldberg. It talks about the inherent differences between males and females which lead to male dominance. What he describes as male dominance is not superiority but a deference of authority. We defer authority to men. Why is this book not circulated in women’s studies classes or gender studies for that matter ? Ya exactly…. You’re spot on with your …
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:50 PM
2

I’m convinced that once they are in charge, they are going to run everything into the ground
/r/MensRights06/02/25 09:41 PM
2

lol, ya and in a generation everyone is going to be saying society prevented your father from attending university
/r/MensRights06/02/25 08:12 PM
10

Ya lol. Essentially everything we go through is seen as funny or at best, it’s get over it. Everything they do is “ stunning and brave”
/r/MensRights05/02/25 09:30 PM
2

Well , it was commandeered by feminists, and that’s where all these problems started
/r/MensRights05/02/25 09:27 PM
5

They do it so that men will find them attractive. This way they don’t have to make it in the risk based on merit or work ethic.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 09:13 PM
12

The more they suppress something, the more it will metastasize It is hilarious thought that boys do catch their attention….. when they think that they’ll be a threat to women… HA! What a joke. Other than that we are invisible.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:44 AM
2

And when it turns out he did nothing wrong…. Well, you guessed it, silence.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:34 PM
14

Do some more research and I think you’ll agree. Often times men are coerced into supporting women’s issue under the pretence that in due time women will give credence to men’s issue also. This is just false, and the sooner you realize this the better. It is all just a guise to get your labor or your resources for them and then offer you nothing in return. We have been doing this for far too long.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 10:29 PM
11

These feminists
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 07:22 PM
14

They only think about themselves
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/02/25 05:36 PM
27

They don’t . Sorry to burst your bubble. Check briffualt’s law .
/r/MensRights04/02/25 05:01 PM
2

Maybe you should look into how women were demanding the right to vote , without being conscripted ( which they still don’t) while many men still couldn’t vote ( which they didn’t give a shit about) and we’re firing in world war 1 ? Tell me that’s not evil right from the start.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 02:35 PM
7

I agree, but it’s very difficult as feminism has such a political star gel hold over things right now. There was recent talk in the UK of creating a men’s centre on university campuses. Guess who shut it down …. Ya.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 02:17 AM
8

When the fuck are people gunna wake up to the fact that feminism is not about equality, it’s always been about power…. Clueless
/r/MensRights04/02/25 12:21 AM
5

And yet our good buddy Richard reeves seem to think feminists have nothing to do with our problems.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 11:45 PM
19

It’s not enough to have female only gyms… but you want to control the behaviour of men on their own time… sick. Feminism really is the new gym crow
/r/MensRights03/02/25 11:43 PM
36

The only time someone comes knocking at our door is when someone wants something from us….. exhibit A
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/25 08:53 PM
3

Ya, I’m not entirely sure why. I’m sure evolution has a lot to do with it. I just wanted to include it for the reason I mentioned above
/r/MensRights02/02/25 11:32 PM
31

My point is that yes, women are stimulated visually by men’s bodies, despite their claims. However the old trope is true that men are even more visual. I think this should serve as evidence that women absolutely do sexualize people, and should be subject to the same scrutiny they do.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 11:26 PM
47

https://youtu.be/MsjCEnVRLSU?si=sD2uhnRgN6WRfK57 This guys shows how people’s brains ( male/female) respond differently to novel visual sexual stimuli. Men’s brains ‘lit up’ a lot more than women’s, but women’s brains still did show some stimulation.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 11:13 PM
3

Well I disagree with you there. It is very much used by academics and very much in the way that you would call “miss-use” . I think you underestimate the degree to which this is true, and also the degree to which these people can be reasoned
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 11:08 PM
6

So I think this is an interesting discussion, but we are kind of going all over the place. So let’s just make it a little more narrow for now. In regards to gender roles, yes it’s different than anything else , because there are differences between the genders, particularly in regards to childbearing, so it is hard to compare to other things ie, race. And yes feminist demand gender roles be abolished for them while doubling down on gender roles for men ie, chivalry. I agree this is a-massive con…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 11:06 PM
6

So I did accurately summarize most of it ? Yes ? So I did understand it. As for your claim that all oppression is tied together, this is just nonesense. Not all “oppressed people” share the same struggle nor would they all be united if the “ veil of oppression were lifted” If their common enemy were to cease to exist, then they would eventually be in conflict with each other. Whether along racial or religious lines. There are many parts of the world, where these groups that intersectional school…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 10:52 PM
4

I agree with some of what you said. The overwhelming amount of “race problems” in the US, is directed at the males: academic under achievement, incarceration, homocide victimization. Yet it’s somehow viewed as a womens issue. You hear the phrase “ women of color” all the time. I doubt you’ll believe me, but the overwhelming cause of problems that face working class black males is far more related to feminism than it is to historical injustices such as Jim Crowe. Even the attempt to repair it suc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 10:46 PM
7

It breaks people down into different sub groups based on ethnicity, religion, creed, gender and orientation, in an attempt to understand their individual/group experience. It seems on the surface as a way to unite people, but it inevitably does anything but. People get classified into in groups and out-groups. People will even divide into oppressors and oppressed “classes” . This is complete none-sense , and doesn’t take into account the elective status of people currently, and ignores a lot abo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 10:22 PM
8

Ya I do. I think you should do a little more research into it. Can I ask you? How is it that you call yourself a feminist? Have you read what has been written about men by feminists ? Or do you just excuse it so you can continue to identify with an ideology that is in fact hateful at its core ?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 10:15 PM
11

I’m pretty shocked that even people here entertain the intersectionality nonesense. If you’re looking to help men or help other people understand the struggles that men face… well, intersectionality isn’t going to do it. Many people who subscribe to this line of thinking are in fact anti-male. Many people consider men to be an in group, and women an out group and they adopt this dichotomy to further perpetuate the transfer or resources over to women. This makes no sense considering the disparity…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/25 09:59 PM
3

Lucky you.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 06:19 PM
30

Because it is. Everyone is coming out of universities that are extremely liberal and have feminist/womens studies sprinkled into the curriculum. I spoke to a girl who is a 3rd year exercise science major, and she said they weee doing a unit on misogyny. …. What a fucking joke
/r/MensRights02/02/25 08:02 AM
11

Ya. Actually. It really is a testament to who is actually invisible. We even notice those women who are far far away, and how horribly they are treated. Yet, we completely ignore the men there who live third rate lives compared to women here….. what a joke
/r/MensRights01/02/25 06:39 AM
7

Ya.. it’s an extortion tactic . How much bargaining power do you really have if you admit that life is good LOL . The only reason women in the Middle East are brought up is so that they can be used as mutilated beggars. Show these women suffering so that you can extort society for more resources that you keep to yourself .
/r/MensRights01/02/25 05:07 AM
10

Yes, a point all about the women who we should really be helping, rather than talking about how society should be helping us, or at least stopping the harms people are inflicting on us
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:50 AM
16

Funny how this post is still completely centred around women LOL
/r/MensRights01/02/25 04:25 AM
10

Happens to the best of us
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:57 PM
28

I think you misunderstand what I’m saying. I’m saying, just as they seem to think they can write off certain men, they will soon find out men are also writing them off
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:03 PM
43

I mean you could just as easily make the assessment that college educated women are undateable consider their divorce proneness and overwhelmingly liberal political views. So to each their own I guess
/r/MensRights31/01/25 10:15 PM
2

Don’t kid yourself, it was never possible. He just decided to to go full throttle and have no regard for what people say instead of pussy footing around the subject
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 06:10 PM
46

It’s almost funny if it weren’t so sad. This is how they are responding to the data on fatherless children. This is what their definition of fatherhood is. Further financial exploitation. It is this kind of exploitation that drove them away to begin with
/r/MensRights31/01/25 03:58 AM
14

No society ever has or ever will succeed if it does not motivate young men to achieve something. This is exactly why the UK is on the decline
/r/MensRights29/01/25 04:25 PM
8

The more you suppress something the more it metastasizes
/r/MensRights27/01/25 09:13 PM
17

Regarding point 6. Yes there is a fucking downside. We barely get any funding( almost all of it has to come from ourselves ) and the little we get is taken from us to give to women, who already get much more funding than we do ?? Sound fair ?? This partner program is also based on a lie . VAWA is propaganda against men. Suggesting that we are somehow out to get women. Meanwhile men are roughly 50% of domestic violence victims and women were more likely to be the primary perpetrators in unilatera…
/r/MensRights25/01/25 06:22 PM
17

Richard Reeves is not to thank for this. He keeps muzzling his way into this and is hijacking the conversation. Until he acknowledges how feminists and discrimination have played a role, he is not an ally. This is a results of men voting in their own way . A fuck you to the feminist left. They are beginning to wake up to the fact that they can’t ignore us without incurring a cost. Don’t be an idiot and credit Reeves with anything for pointing out the obvious but then sidestepping the obvious rol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 11:21 PM
2

The presupposition that you have that women were oppressed is false and I definitely think you should look into it. https://youtu.be/2VupEC0cAWo?si=YT4QJLmcZaRyrnoO Watch this video
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 10:22 PM
2

Exactly what I am referring to. Don’t forget it is what has already happened to universities. This were built by men and largely served a male audience, until feminists judged their way in.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 10:13 PM
2

Hopefully you don’t allow your organization to become infested with feminists who will transfer funding towards women’s problems at the expense of our own.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 08:46 PM
4

CH Sommers is the only one. You get the point. One exception does not make the rule. https://youtu.be/AQWoNhrY_fM?si=e07DZx6kU8T7Rygx As for evidence. The video above, demonstrates plenty of examples.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 12:26 AM
10

I thought they were independent? Why do they think men should fix women’s problems
/r/MensRights23/01/25 08:24 PM
36

There is no such thing as a pro men feminist. Just like there is no such thing as a pro Jew nazi
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/25 06:20 AM
8

Mouse utopia ?
/r/MensRights23/01/25 03:19 AM
5

Yes, and it used to be different . I’m telling you the history. Which you obviously don’t know. Therefore your base of knowledge for understanding the u Trent stage of affairs, is flawed. Women demanded sole custody. This started in the late 1800’s. Go look it up. Sole mother custody was not forced onto women by men…. No, they demanded it. Father custody used to be the norm. Then feminists changed it.
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:04 AM
5

Women go for men that earn than they do, so it is relative. This increases the standard of living for both people. So she is being compensated. With an additional income from her partner, which is likely to be higher than hers because that is what she looks for, she now will probably live in a bigger house and better neighbourhood and have a better future for her children. Certainly better than if she were single mother. In these circumstances, women often prefer to let their career take a backs…
/r/MensRights23/01/25 12:02 AM
5

You are completely incorrect. Go look up the history of child custody. Feminist are the ones who advocated for sole custody back in the mid 1800’s. Back then the dad got sole custody by default, but I bet you didn’t know that.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:55 PM
6

Just as single men also do their own laundry, clean the house, clean the dishes, and cook their food. When you get people together, they decide to divide labor based on what’s more suitable for them. Women no longer have to take out the trash or clean the gutters or cut the grass. And men no longer have to clean the dishes and do the laundry. You see how that works ? It’s called quid pro qou….
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:53 PM
9

I just explained why it’s fair to you. Because most of the time the guy also has his own set of chores. As listed above, which you refuse to acknowledge. Secondly, generally women go for men that earn more. He plays the role of the financial proovder ( more/harder work outside the home) and she supports the creation of the home( more work inside the home) it’s a division of labor. She is not getting paid for chores, just as he is not getting paid for his chores. And in the cases where he does ea…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:51 PM
9

Women don’t get to clock out ? HA ! You are delusional. Like I said… are men getting paid for taking out the garbage? Fixing the car? Fixing the house? Cleaning the gutters? Shovelling the snow ? Or cutting the grass ? Ya… I didn’t think so. These are household chores that people are supposed to do for themselves. God forbid women have to clean up after themselves. Single women don’t have to cook or clean, or do laundry for themselves ? Along with all the other chores that men do ? Exactly
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:42 PM
3

I suppose women are going to start shovelling the snow, and cutting the grass as often as men ? As well as cleaning the gutter and taking out the trash ? How about repairing the car( or dealing with the mechanic) or horn repair? Are women going to do any of that ? I highly doubt it. This is just another way for people to dump more responsibilities on men. Seriously …. Of all the problems men are facing, and you suggest men need to tackle the issue of doing more housework ?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:37 PM
7

Posts like these are the kinda of things that Richard Reeves would propose….”if only men would do more housework, then maybe their problems would go away! Maybe if men supported women more, they would find purpose in life!” Posts like these are an effing joke.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:37 PM
9

You are delusional. They ask for a division of labor, and now women want men to do the woman’s half also. Ridiculous.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:28 PM
5

In other words, yes
/r/MensRights22/01/25 09:52 PM
17

So women want to date a higher earner. Meaning he does more work outside the home… so to compensate, you do more work inside the home right ? This is called a division of labor. But no, feminists want men to do more work inside and outside the home, also being given preferential treatment in hiring and having men pay for their expenses. Basically they want to just relax for free, all subsidized by men.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 07:23 PM
9

A state within a state…
/r/MensRights21/01/25 11:14 PM
1

They are using it because if they gain the support of men on this issue, they can then levy that political power for their own purposes on other female specific issues. This is their way of pretending to care about some of our problems, so they can get our vote. I know you don’t want to believe it, but it’s better that you are aware
/r/MensRights20/01/25 04:37 PM
1

What I’m saying is you should be wary of their motives And, feminists are hypocrites. They have no problem entertaining double standards . The reason they are eager to please on this one, is because they see that they may have something to gain. Do not trust them
/r/MensRights20/01/25 03:31 AM
18

HR type bureaucracies were how feminists nudged their way into the corporate world.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 02:32 AM
0

Honestly, don’t get your hopes up. I am obviously against neo-natal circumcision, but a lot of the women who have gotten on board are unfortunately crazy leftists, who are only supporting this because they feel it strengthens their “pro-choice” stance. They feel that more men will support their leftist policies and abortion policies by extending an olive branch- it is not sincere. Their support is just a Trojan horse for more feminism, when it should be a bi-partisan issue. “Your penis , your ch…
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:56 PM
4

Pretty funny lol
/r/MensRights19/01/25 10:05 PM
0

Yes, but because the system itself is so feminist, those independent thinkers will be weeded out
/r/MensRights18/01/25 05:45 PM
19

Yup. She can withdraw her services ( sex, housekeeping, the family she provided) , but he cannot withdraw his( his paycheque) . The whole purpose he went into the marriage for, was to be provided with a family, which she withdrew, meaning the agreement was faulty from the start; just a fake promise.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:09 AM
2

Exactly, and those are the males that will be picked. Trust me, once any man with any idea that dissents from feminist thought enters these schools, they will be quickly shunned and shipped out.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:29 AM
0

The reason They’re doing this is because they want to use men to help turn these young boys into feminists. It’s not because they want to improve the conditions of these boys lives. It’s because they believe that with male authority, they will be better able to control these boys for the purpose of turning them into feminists. Obedient drones. I know a couple guys in early childhood education. All their friends are women, and they repeat the same feminist rhetoric. They have gone through the fem…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:25 AM
75

Funny cuz if he wasn’t focused on his career, she would’ve left him for being a lazy bum. Daniel Amneus talks about this in his book father custody. Now he’ll be subsidizing single motherhood, leading to all the pathologies associated with that. When what should happen, is his wife can leave on her own terms, and his kids stay with him. This way they continue to be raised with a father and avoid the outcomes of single motherhood, and they are properly cared for by the higher earner. Also, consid…
/r/MensRights18/01/25 05:28 AM
3

Well, before that we have to get the feminists out of education
/r/MensRights17/01/25 10:51 PM
26

I remember being a boy in elementary school, and absolutely hating how much better they were treated and how you weren’t even allowed to speak up about . Even now you can’t, but people are whispering about it
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:47 PM
26

This is 25 years too late… how men men are complete drifters, violent criminals, have committed suicide because of the preferrential treatment we give girls ? Countless What the institutions should do is issue a public apology signed by every faculty member, and terminate anyone who refuses.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:21 PM
3

Until we stop the discrimination and make those who perpetuate it, accountable ( women and men) , nothing will change
/r/MensRights16/01/25 10:15 PM
52

If only I could record the number of tirades I have seen against men in public at the hands of women… holy shit I’d have a highlight reel. I’ll tell ya what, I doubt they’d get punished
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:51 PM
1

Every measurable statistic
/r/MensRights16/01/25 09:16 PM
13

Telling these people about mens issues is like telling the nazis about the Jews. Honestly, they are financially incentives to keep promoting more women. They’ll pretend to care under the pretense of being true to their mantra of “diversity” but they do not care. Trust me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/25 07:28 PM
1

https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=ieVZrQiNNyX7x-WW His books are somewhat hard to get. Look on eBay. This video is a pretty good summary
/r/MensRights15/01/25 04:21 PM
30

Who has died from circumcision …. About 100 babies every year
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/25 07:31 AM
19

LOOOOL Let’s take a Time Machine back 40 years… Does homosexuality cause suicidality ?? I mean , gays do commit suicide more than heterosexuals…. Or maybe it’s because at that time period we were socially ostracizing them and demonizing their behaviour and inherent existence ???
/r/MensRights15/01/25 07:29 AM
3

Yup. After reading the work of Daniel Amneus, my assumptions about feminism have been completely validated. Their goal is to return to Stone Age kinship system of matriliny. In this system, the mother has sole custody of the children, and males are superfluous. They grow role-less and violent, and the females perpetuate the cycle of illegitimacy, having kids without fathers who then go on to wreak havoc on society. This of course leads to poverty for everyone. As is the case in the ghetto, where…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 07:26 AM
7

Now you’re talking at the difference in means vs individual members of a population. The example I showed you regarding china, reflects a difference in means. On average women were committing suicide more especially in the younger age cohorts. I agree biology plays a role, however changes made to a culture( environment) could potentially go a long way to changing the disparity in suicides.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 10:15 PM
5

Exactly, there was a change somewhere in the country and thus the ratio changed. Just like the prior status qou resulted in a gender ratio that was the reverse of the norm we are accustomed to in the west. My point is that environmental factors can nudge the ratio in one direction or the other. There was something unique about china that produced a gender ratio that was reversed for a certain age cohort and for a period of time that is also currently changing. This means that the male:female sui…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 10:08 PM
1

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2913725/#:~:text=Females%20generally%20commit%20more%20suicides,but%20only%20before%20certain%20ages.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 09:55 PM
10

You’re wrong there I think. In china, it’s reversed with women commuting choices more often then men, and the gap has actually closed in the past few years. Therefore social change does have a significant influence on it. Not to mention that in Switzerland, assisted dying programs have been available for decades. Women use these programs much more often than men do. Not to mention women supposedly think about suicide more. I think if society were different we could have a very different outcome …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 09:27 PM
26

I wonder what women suicide rates would be if we had affirmative action for men, longer prison sentences for women, less overmen’s subsidization, forced extraction of earnings for a former spouse( alimony), the punishment for failing to meet such obligations realists in prison time, and default assumption of father custody, an education system that is overwhelmingly biased against them, and a culture that claims that they are backwards and need to be corrected. Do you think women suicide rates w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/01/25 07:53 PM
6

That’s the goal of feminism. To make the male role one of subsidization of women.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 06:43 PM
5

I couldn’t have said it better myself. And yet they are labelled the empathetic gender
/r/MensRights14/01/25 05:57 PM
2

Ya, I’ll check it out.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 03:00 AM
5

I know it may seem bleak, and like the world is working against us. But even in defeat, there will be justice, for as Amneus says, if we return to matriarchy, we invariable return to the ghetto, the stone age, the barnyard, the pigsty. It’s just matter of time. Universities are the next place where this is happening. As they become more female dominated, they will cease to be what made them great, and inevitably collapse.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 01:31 AM
7

If you’re open minded enough, check out the work of Daniel Amneus. https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=gWZx2TrhKSdRPuKP He’s also wrote a couple of books which I think are a must read, for the mens rights space. Start with “The Garbage Generation” and then “The Case for Father Custody” People worship the opinion of Karen Straughn, however as I’ve read the work of Amneus, she really is just paraphrasing what he has to say, if not just outright plagiarism.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 01:11 AM
11

Yes. Exactly how to push back is the question. Even explaining this to people in day to day conversations seem impossible
/r/MensRights14/01/25 12:56 AM
49

Ya, I was wondering when someone else would notice. We are literally swimming in propaganda. I made a post a while back about when you google male dominated fields vs female dominated fields. In both search queries, almost exclusively are women portrayed. And then they wonder why male enrolment at college is declining. This is at the core of feminism. To make the male role in society superfluous. However, if they succeed, all of society will go with it.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 12:48 AM
-5

You’re right… it’s not about us… or you for that matter. It’s about families, that invariable make up society , and the civilized world, which you are undermining with the feminist influence which undermines families, and thus society. It’s not about us, but it’s not about you(feminists) either. But if you continue to make it exclusively about you, society will not function correctly .
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/25 10:07 PM
33

If this guy actually thinks that women aren’t working dangerous jobs because men haven’t allowed them to, then he’s never actually worked along side a woman. Even in office settings they make their male colleagues lift boxes for them. If those jobs were filled with women, they would not function properly. Most women have historically been excluded from those professions, because they cannot meet the physical requirements to do them. As strange as it sounds, we actually make them even more danger…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 09:36 PM
31

So basically we got back to the difference in agency . Women have none, and men have all of it. Do you see why men may object to female firefighters? As it weakens the force ? It puts the lives of men in danger. If that firefighter were male, he would be able to rescue his team mate. By adding women, you increase the burden on men, and then on all of us.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 09:28 PM
8

Exactly, it is just an ideology of expropriation, and this is seeking the assistance of the same people he is trying to expropriate. Eg. “Here’s how white people and men can help end white supremacy and the patriarchy” read “ here’s how white people and men can help give their resources to another group of people in exchange for nothing. Those same resources will then be used against them, causing their own subjugation, but we will pat them on the head and say thank you for dismantling oppressio…
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:40 PM
9

Yes it is . It divides us long every single ethnic and cultural line that it can, and then broadly puts people into the category of white( read oppressor) and then non-white( person of colour , read : oppressed). This is done under the guise of creating societal harmony when in fact it is just a tactic to extort another group for resources using guilt. I actually feel sorry for you that you are falling for this.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:46 PM
11

It’s used as propaganda, by liberals, to make white Europeans and men particularly , and outgroup. To make them the target of the current societal woes in order to relieve the current existential anxiety that occurs when societies are breaking down. It is a tactic to scapegoat them. Societal breakdown occurs, when male kinship( patriarchy) begins to breakdown and single motherhood( female kinship) begins to become the norm.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:41 PM
10

There we go . Intersectionality. You for sure learned this from your liberal arts professor. I wish you could see through what propaganda this is .
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:35 PM
11

You are probably too far gone with your belief system that you would even write something like this. I doubt there’s any talking you out of it
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:33 PM
23

Posts like this worry me about how badly student are getting educated.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:24 PM
3

I’m referring to Richard reeves himself. He aligns himself with feminists and I’m sure he considers himself to be one of. My points are directed at people like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 06:17 AM
1

Well if that’s true then you are on the right track. Sorry, a lot of people try to pretend it is, and that it is somehow good for men. If you know anything about feminism, then you would know that anyone who calls themselves a feminist, or aligns themselves with feminists cannot be of any real help to us. They are just a a wolf in sheep’s clothing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 06:00 AM
4

Feminism and men’s rights cannot coexist. If you don’t believe this statement then you do not fully understand the issues at hand. You believe feminism to be an egalitarian ideology. It’s not…. And can elaborate but I doubt you care to listen. I will leave you with this though. Once you do enough research, you will find that almost every problem men have insects has its roots in feminist political influence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/25 05:55 AM
2

“Cutting off our nose to spite our face ?” HA ! More like cutting off cancer before it spreads ! This guy will take everything that men are going through and spin it as a “women’s issue” or a way to properly “civilize” men according to what women’s needs are…. But only if it’s not too inconvenient for women. This guy is a fucking joke… and if you think he is remotely useful at even communicating with women, you are an IDIOT !
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 09:58 PM
2

The dems got on board with helping black people remember ?? How did that work out ?? Oh ya… it made everything WORSE! This is not what we want for the broader male members of society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 04:55 PM
13

That is exactly the problem. He is hijacking the conversation and very disingenuously presenting our problems to the world. If he continues to gain traction, expect more of the same gaslighting that’s been going on with no real solutions in sight. The feminist machinery that is to blame for so many of our problems will continue to grow, and so will our despair, however idiots will find comfort in the fact that “hey Richard Reeves is working on it !”, when in fact nothing is actually changing or …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 04:54 PM
42

Ya that’s exactly why people hate this guy. He pussy foots and kowtows to women for their approval. We should not have to be apologetic about this. We deserve human rights just like everyone else. What was that quote of his? “Doubling down on women’s issues is okay? “ are your fucking serious ? As far ahead as they are now, and you think it’s okay to DOUBLE DOWN on helping them ? Have you lost your mind? That is EXACTLY why boys are behind, because of all the special treatment we give girls, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 06:47 AM
36

Men are harmed by misogyny ?? wtf kind of a statement is this ? Men are harmed by discrimination such as misandry … the hatred of men …. Don’t make this about women more than it already is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 05:50 AM
42

Ya seriously. This is why so many dislike him. Who is he apologizing to btw ?? Oh that’s right … women. And that is exactly why we can’t have these discussions, because they are inconveniences to women…. What a fucking joke. I hate that this guy is becoming some sort of front runner for this cause.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/25 05:40 AM
52

Yet you have feminist/women complaining of medical sexism/misogyny. Well, wtf is this ? Breaking the bones of a newborn child ? You think this has anything to do with what we are teaching girls in school/college ? This has nothing to do with the feminist curriculum they receive ? Not a peep. Not even the consideration that this could be their own son.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 05:30 AM
2

I hear a lot of people complaining about how universities are just becoming growing bureaucracies that coddle their students too much and I guess your anecdote is a testament to that.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:28 AM
1

So people have piled a lot more work on your plate , and you’re now responsible for things that historically students were themselves responsible for ?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:18 AM
2

So you work with students, broadly from a guidance counselling perspective ?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:11 AM
2

What field ?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:06 AM
2

Care to elaborate ?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 02:11 AM
2

I know that it may be of no solace, but I want to recommend a book to you during this time. It may help you see through the gaslighting of feminist society. It was written by Daniel Amneus, a former prominent figure in the men’s movement. The book is title “ The Garbage Generation”. It talks about family structure and many principles that govern our species, particularly in regards to male and females relational dynamics and how they affect the family structure. It helped me a lot. I think it wi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/25 10:46 PM
9

Exactly. I hope you find your way through, and I can get some peace.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/25 10:40 PM
39

It’s not them not reaching out for help. It’s the way the world is treating them, and feminists are perpetuating this treatment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/25 06:25 PM
3

I’m not saying it isn’t valid, but I’m saying they came up with it, having ulterior motivations
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:38 PM
8

No I’m not …. I’m saying they only created it for their own benefit, particularly in cases where wealthy corporate elite were under scrutiny. It was to gerrymandering the results when there was not enough evidence to convict the person of an offence. The idea was that even though the girl consented, she did so because of the “power imbalances” therefore, it was still assault. In theory, yes, a case like this serves as an example of how a power imbalance plays a role, but where are the feminists …
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:27 AM
16

No, I’m referencing nothing related to prison guards. Just the argument that feminists have constructed that power imbalances play a role in sexual abuse was just a weapon feminist came up with for their own benefit not the benefit of actual victims
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:19 AM
28

Oh my god… you are so delusional. You need to do some more reading. Right from the beginning, they have been trying to undermine the role of the father. This was the first thing they set out to do in 1848 at Seneca falls.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:13 AM
17

Women commandeering the bureaucracy created by men for their own feminist purposes ? Yup.. sounds bout right
/r/MensRights06/01/25 11:12 PM
78

lol the “position of power “ argument was just concocted by feminist to add further punishments for men
/r/MensRights06/01/25 09:32 PM
1

You seem like much more of a friend than a foe. Look into the work of Daniel Amneus. Here’s an excerpt from one of his books https://youtu.be/GWV93ncvx3I?si=2gEyezS-oVqbThrS May I ask what your timelines for some of these changes are ?
/r/MensRights06/01/25 05:10 AM
1

Pretty reasonable take. Still comes off as a bit of an oxymoron though, you know ? Like, maybe the laws should actually change ? Maybe the structural biases should actually be corrected ? If youre interested, I suggest looking into the work of Daniel Amneus. His solution - father custody - would be revolutionary for this movement.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 04:17 AM
33

They just like to complain
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:40 AM
44

And she’ll serve 2
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:31 AM
5

My point is why would you listen to someone who profits from divorce ? Wouldn’t his advice lead to more divorce, which he is financially incentivized to do.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 09:07 AM
27

Isn’t the iron law in place here ? If someone’s job depends on a problem, then they are incentivized to maintain that problem. Basically, why would you take dating advice from someone who profits from relationships being dissolved ?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:31 AM
5

What’s new ?
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:01 AM
31

We live in a much less masculine time , and yet these problems are much more prolific ….
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/25 08:52 PM
34

There was a post here about it.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 06:41 AM
176

Wasn’t it the UK, that is building government housing for older single women, where men are barred from entering ( even family members)? But when men do it, it’s suddenly bad? And they have to do it of their own accord, no special subsidy …
/r/MensRights03/01/25 12:58 AM
59

I’m sorry man. I was raised by a single mother, and three of her sisters. I know how much it hurts to realize those relationships were hollow.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:13 AM
117

I be said it before and I’ll say it again. Even your own kin is subject to WAW
/r/MensRights02/01/25 06:09 AM
12

100%… We all know the same thing. We just don’t all know that we know
/r/MensRights02/01/25 04:43 AM
43

Women in male fields have a higher retention rate than men in female fields. Apparently we vote with our feet, and clearly females aren’t that mistreated because they stay, where as the males flee.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:48 AM
9

You think they’d be a good start ?
/r/MensRights01/01/25 08:05 AM
39

There are a few big lawsuits against the tech companies ( all against white men) that are still going on. Hopefully we will see justice served and hopefully a paradigm shift will be underway, but unfortunately I think it will be later rather than sooner
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:01 AM
116

Well it’s an example of we underestimate our own power. Perhaps we’ll be lucky enough to see bigger organize face substantial punishment for their mistreatment of us.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 04:23 AM
1

Like I said in a subsequent comment, I’m referring to the perception that a man has it easier.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 06:14 PM
52

To quote an episode of family guy, “ I blame the schools” https://youtu.be/hOed0qAt-fg?si=MZTsQujAwPE7mMsb
/r/MensRights31/12/24 05:58 AM
2

Until this guy acknowledges that discrimination is a core pillar of muscle suffering in our society, and how feminist are the chief perpetuators, he is not our ally.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 04:06 AM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/thepassportbros/s/gGUwIOYV46 Couldn’t resist.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 03:39 AM
4

I’m saying that this is the social perception, and what they use to justify the perceived victimhood of divorced women. I agree the reality is far from this.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:39 PM
19

People always point out how it’s unfair that a divorced woman’s value drops and a man’s doesn’t. And how it’s unfair that a divorcee woman has such a hard time remarrying…. Well, this might be an indication as to why. Your willingness to dissolve one marriage for your own benefit is an indicator of your willingness to do it again.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 05:26 PM
1

I think it would greatly benefit you to read it. The author is Imran Khan. But I can’t force you. It’s held up by many in this sub as manifesto-like.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 08:20 PM
1

It will have a similar conclusion. All roads lead to Rome .
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:41 PM
1

Bro it’s the first search result. Jesus Christ man. Singularity2050.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:37 PM
2

I doubt it’s the same post, but look for the misandry bubble on google. It points to similar trends
/r/MensRights29/12/24 07:49 AM
12

Holy crap, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, he IS NOT our friend. This guy blatantly denies how discrimination plays a role in our lives and denies how the feminist movement causes all these problems. If you actually want a better book, go with “the boy crisis “ by Warren Farrell. Let me repeat myself. RICHARD REEVES IS NOT OUR FRIEND. If you think so you are absolutely delusional. Please , don’t waste your time with his lies. There are many other people - such as CH Sommers- who have …
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:13 AM
11

I think this is a much better choice. Richard reeves is very dishonest, and has allied himself with feminists
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:09 AM
6

Exactly, when ever I have suggested it to someone, they always think they know what it’s about, and then never take up the offer.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 05:01 AM
15

Also, the wider standard deviation among men means that there are more people on the tail end of the distribution. So if significantly more gifted people are men, shouldn’t academia, the Mecca of cognitive ability, be dominated by men? Oh wait! It was, until feminism arrived.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:29 PM
6

You should probably gtfo
/r/MensRights28/12/24 07:24 AM
7

If you consider the Stone Age , the barnyard, or the ghetto, successful then there you have it. The societies they refer to , are all societies that existed 5000 years ago. That was the Stone Age. Or , when societies are in breakdown, these patterns begin to emerge; when a culture is in free fall.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 03:20 AM
6

Ya I just acknowledged that. And I said those women get the treatment that men do, being irrelevant. I’m not sure who you are quoting, because that wasn’t me. You also did nothing to address my point about prison sentence disparity between black women and white men.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:24 PM
18

I assure you, men are much more invisible to women than the other way around. Yes I agree with you regarding unattractive women, however, my point is, that is the experience men have when they are not part of a wealthy elite. Those unattractive women, share the experience of the bottom 90% of men. Regarding prison sentencing. Yes, white women get better sentences than black women. But ALL women, get better prison sentences than men. Black women get better sentences than white men. And the gap is…
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:16 PM
19

Well, they still receive shorter prison sentences and are far more protected. However you are right. They get a taste of what it is like not to be surrounded by such privilege. They get a taste of what it is like to be us.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:02 PM
36

“The patriarchy hurts us all” … anyone who utters such a statement has no idea what patriarchy actually is. All it is, is kinship through males. Established paternity through marriage, where the father is the head of the household. The norm, before this cultural revolution, was matriliny ; mother custody. It is the norm in every other species - check Briffualt’s law. Once our species adopted male kinship, that is when civilization was born, and we left the Stone Age. As we revert back to female …
/r/MensRights27/12/24 10:01 PM
24

I’m talking about the bubble many of them are in regarding how nicely people treat them, completely unaware that it is because of their gender.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 09:42 PM
30

Exactly. Feminism seeks to exacerbate gender roles that benefit women, while minimizing the negatives. Alimony/child support are key examples. Keeping access to the husbands services, while withdrawing yours.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 09:08 PM
60

Like little children, many of them have no idea what the world is actually like
/r/MensRights27/12/24 08:54 PM
6

It’s the same with doctors.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 05:01 PM
1

THIS
/r/MensRights26/12/24 10:11 AM
77

Cry me a river. How many men were displaced so she could have a spot in school, in work, and then brushed aside so she could be promoted ? And now what ? She didn’t even want those things she was handed… you made your bed, now lie in it.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 01:37 AM
251

LMAO… they only want your support when it’s convenient to them. You could spend your whole life helping them, the second you disagree, you are cast out like a lepor. They are not your friends.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 11:00 PM
1

The Sam pattern unfolds. Men build it, women show up, capture it, force us out, and then use it against us.
/r/MensRights25/12/24 05:05 PM
3

That’s their way of giving us the bird
/r/MensRights24/12/24 03:56 AM
48

This is why so many people don’t want them around . And yet there are some idiots who think in bringing women into spaces like this will actually help them get laid. As if.
/r/MensRights24/12/24 01:59 AM
32

According to Linda Farstien, head of the sexual crimes unit of the DA of manhattan , 50% of rape allegations are false.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 10:23 PM
78

It does already. Look up how almost all women who end up homeless, drug addicted, in prison, suicide, almost all come from a fatherless home. By pushing men out of the picture, they end up falling through the cracks themselves.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 06:57 PM
1

Equally applied to the other side
/r/MensRights22/12/24 06:02 PM
161

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again…. They’ll will care once it affects them.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:09 PM
1

It’s not lol…
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:58 PM
2

It’s already here
/r/MensRights19/12/24 09:22 PM
16

Of course they are. Even in the face of clear vixen e they turn a blind eye. Willful ignorance.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:42 PM
2

You can go watch his appearance on “the modern wisdom podcast. He does not use the term nonesense but he brushes her claims aside. You can see for yourself. In fact, after referencing her work, he says there is “no evidence”. While simultaneously claiming the reason girls used to lag behind was exclusively due to “sexism “. I actually want to laugh at how delusional someone has to be to entertain this kind of double think. Go see for yourself Trust me, I am with you 100 percent on the cause bein…
/r/MensRights16/12/24 04:35 AM
6

According to Mr, reeves, CH Sommers book is complete nonesense - although he never elaborates as to why - and he also denies that the women’s equity act has nothing to do with this - even though he never addresses why- and he also seems to forget that men used to well ahead in math and science, and doesn’t seem to acknowledge that boys are still doing better on standardized tests such as the lsat, even thought they are only 40% of law school students…… that’s weird… If you believe this guy wants…
/r/MensRights16/12/24 03:24 AM
5

Exactly . This guy will do 10x more harm then good and yet some doofuses here actually think he is our messiah HA. What idiots. He is only going to help feminists further advance their agenda. I mean actually think of it. How is the solution to anything to hold people back ? You are supposed to give people. HEAD START, not hold them back. I have no idea how anyone can think this is a good idea. When has the solution to any societal problem women have faced, been to hold them back ? Honestly….
/r/MensRights16/12/24 02:55 AM
15

Don’t forget, he starts every single fucking conversation with a 20 minute rant about how women’s issues must not be forgotten ( as if anyone ever could). When it’s about us , it’s really just about them
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:58 PM
45

Cause he tells feminists what they want to hear. It’s not your fault, it’s really just the inherent flaws in boys. … It is part of the Overton window to talk about the problems men and boys have, but not to actually point at what the real causes are yet. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, this guy is not our friend. Just a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 10:46 PM
5

Ya, a better step would be to abolish family courts altogether
/r/MensRights14/12/24 07:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter