Why circumcision should be abhorred

kanuk876 · 2010-08-19T04:12:55+00:00

Interesting how the pro-genital-mutilation camp has the greater representation here.

Trying to deny something, guys? A.... loss of something, perhaps?

BedsideAnalrapist · 2010-08-19T04:03:34+00:00

You mean, circumcision on infants should be abhorred.

etherspirit · 2010-08-19T07:37:41+00:00

Awesome post.

danxmason · 2010-08-19T01:03:38+00:00

If you like smelly dick-cheese and pre-ejaculation, don't get circumcised.

k2dkf · 2010-08-18T23:57:51+00:00

"Children are not possessions; parents do not own them. They are human beings with inalienable human rights. To permanently and unnecessarily scar a child without their express and informed consent (and when they are not old enough to comprehend the consequences) is a violation of those rights."

This is complete FAIL logic based on the false premise that you actually HAVE 'rights.'

There's no such thing as rights. There are only AGREEMENTS between men. That's it. If men stop agreeing, rights stop existing. IMMEDIATELY. Simple as that.

If this silly premise were true, men would never have to concern themselves with protecting their 'civil rights.'

And since this article is based on this foolish premise, circumcision should NOT be abhorred. Circumcision is a GOOD (meaning practical) thing as medical evidence shows us in many cases.

Title	Why circumcision should be abhorred
Author	kloo2yoo
Upvotes	12
Comments	26
Date	August 18, 2010 8:20 PM UTC (15 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/d2q4n/why_circumcision_should_be_abhorred/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/why-circumcision-should-be-abhorred.1048001 https://theredarchive.com/post/1048001

Comments