Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]wtknightGen X Slacker[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link
Removed. No link dropping
[–]psypD1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Embrace your toxic masculinity bro,
[–]AutoModeratorMarried to MRS_DRgree[M] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Attention!
You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!
Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[–][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
Ignore women's problems as they're trivial. Make male only venues legal. Repeal the 19th amendment.
[–]ButterTartWarriorUnicorn0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
go start a mens group for talking about mens problems, who is stopping you all
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
Women bitching to have it closed because it excludes women. Its literally the girl whining to daddy because her brother won't let her in the boys club tree house. Women literally do not mentally mature past the age of 14.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Bitch yes they do you get your misogynistic bullshit out of here.
[–]ButterTartWarriorUnicorn0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
bitching to have what closed lol
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Nobody gives a shit about mens problems. Not even MRA's, if they did then they would be making moves but they aren't.
If you're a man just live your life, don't expect sympathy from anyone. Life for yourself, it's ok to be selfish.
Nobody is gonna care about you as much as you care about yourself, remember that
[–]wardenferry419[S] -1 points0 points1 point (34 children) | Copy Link
Has some validity in my opinion. Agree or disagree?
[–]BROWN-TOILET-PAPERPurge Week Should be a Month!0 points1 point2 points (33 children) | Copy Link
Yes, the sky is blue, and that won't change anytime soon. Men are disposable sperm donors, and women bare children giving them the 'precious' card. That is the basis of our reality. Both human beings, not the same allowance given. You don't get the luxury of being listened to as a man unless you pay a lot of money for it that most men can't afford. At best, you get lucky and find a great male friend that you'd better hold on to for dear life if you do. Otherwise, get used to sucking it all down and slowly dying inside. Just part of being a man.
[–]Lie-Equal0 points1 point2 points (32 children) | Copy Link
They don't even do that at a replacement level anymore, thereby making all the societal coddling a total and irredeemable waste
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (31 children) | Copy Link
That's because too many people are having children. There is actually an overpopulation problem.
[–]Lie-Equal0 points1 point2 points (30 children) | Copy Link
The overpopulation problem is not in the same places as the not breeding at replacement rate problem
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (29 children) | Copy Link
Proof?
[–]Lie-Equal0 points1 point2 points (28 children) | Copy Link
Third world countries have many more children (well above replacement), whereas first world countries have far fewer children (below replacement). Thus it stands to reason that any global overpopulation issue is being driven primarily by those who breed at far above replacement rates rather than below.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (27 children) | Copy Link
Again, proof. Cite studies which say first world countries are underpopulated.
[–]Lie-Equal0 points1 point2 points (26 children) | Copy Link
This is like really common knowledge unless I'm missing what you're driving at Fertility rates by country
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (23 children) | Copy Link
1.41 2017 EST. 211 CROATIA 1.40 2017 EST. 212 ANDORRA 1.40 2017 EST. 213 SLOVENIA 1.36 2017 EST. 214 ROMANIA 1.35 2017 EST. 215 POLAND 1.35 2017 EST. 216 MONTSERRAT 1.33 2017 EST. 217 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1.30 2017 EST. 218 BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS 1.29 2017 EST. 219 KOREA, SOUTH 1.26 2017 EST. 220 PUERTO RICO 1.22 2017 EST. 221 HONG KONG 1.19 2017 EST. 222 TAIWAN 1.13 2017 EST. 223 MACAU 0.95 2017 EST. 224 SINGAPORE 0.83 Do these look like first world countries to you? These are the underpopulated ones.
Real first world countries like the UK, France, and the US are in the middle, where they should be.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Relative to the ones at the top of the list? Yes, yes they are.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
But they aren’t actually first world countries.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Here from the NIH
Declining birth rate in Developed Countries: A radical policy re-think is required
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Developed countries tend to have a lower fertility rate due to lifestyle choices associated with economic affluence where mortality rates are low, birth control is easily accessible and children often can become an economic drain caused by housing, education cost and other cost involved in bringing up children. Higher education and professional careers often mean that women have children late in life. This can result in a demographic economic paradox
[–][deleted]2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
So you understand now?
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah I don’t think it’s women’s fault. Children are too dang expensive.
[–][deleted]2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
That right? Well poor women have more children than wealthier women so one might offer that the wealthier women are too big for their britches and have their priorities out of whack 🤷♂️ to each their own I guess I have no problem with neurotic box checking class striving wagie women breeding themselves out of existence with pointless status whoring lmao
Regardless, it's not rich countries that are driving the global population problem regardless of the reasons they aren't doing so.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Our priority is not being baby factories, thank you very much.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah it's making muh PowerPoints for some faceless corporation, way more important than the joy of being around and raising up one's own children lmfao...like I said, to each their own, but that strain of preference tends to breed itself out of existence anyway, to the benefit of everyone else.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
So every woman is working as a business major. I for one am studying to help children with speech disorders treat their disorders so fuck you for that.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
The mindset that raising children is "bring a baby factory" instead of "joyous fulfillment", well, that's the middle class wagie mindset. Even if you're doing something prosocial, you bought into it.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Not everyone wants children. I don't at this time. They'd be a giant financial drain.
[–][deleted]2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
This is the whole point: the values and mindset and assumed needs that lead to the conclusion that children are a "giant financial drain" is fundamentally what's wrong with the middle class wagie mindset. The working class have this part correct, valuing family, prioritizing basic needs, etc.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Or how about we make it so having children doesn't cost so damn much rather than pretend nothing is wrong with the economy.
Working class families have more children because they can't afford birth control.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
That is so misguided and it's again reflective of the disconnect, assuming that they're as sterile and anti-natalist as the middle class. They want to have children, and they realize that familial connections are way more important.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
It's literally proven fact that they don't have birth control. Or they have poor sex education.
Plus, would you want to be the child of parents who decided to have you but couldn't afford you, or parents that can afford you?
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
What matters is what they end up doing. Even umc folks who can comforyably afford children end up damaging them because they prioritize the idiotic rat race and end up inculcating those values in their children thereby perpetuating future sterile box checking robots
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Fine then. Dehumanize women and act like their only role in humanity should be "baby factory". You're stubborn as shit.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
They don't feel dehumanized. That's what they want. If you think I'm saying women who don't want children should force themselves to want children you couldn't be more wrong. What I am saying is that the values that the (mostly working class) women who want children and love children have are vastly preferable. Everyone's entitled to a preference, after all.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Well I as a woman feel dehumanized and offended. You have no right to speak for any woman because you aren't one.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm a human living in a society in which different women have different values, and I prefer the women whose values are those which I think are the correct ones. Isn't that basic freedom of association shit? If anything, it's you that's dehumanizing women by characterizing women who hold said values as "baby factories".
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Well no values are "correct". That implies all other values are wrong so that's why I feel offended.
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
"I think are the correct values" is stating an opinion.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
It doesnt have a valid counterargument so it's trying to shut you down by making you try to find sources where scientists can be fired for pointing it out. Overpopulation scare is propaganda to further promote white genocide. Because Boom Boom in Africa not only cant read, but he doesnt have a computer
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah, well I'm not white but regardless I take offense at those people who say I have some obligation to not follow the natural drive to have a whole mess of children just because I live in a nice country.