An interesting thread on the front page with regard to divorce inequality.

TheDialecticParadox · 2015-06-27T08:42:22+00:00

I also don't think that these things are improving. I actually feel that things will eventually get to the point where betas are made to feel lucky to have even had a woman, even if she did cheat or is cheating.

That is happening right now.

Guys have so little self-worth, they are forgiving any discrepancy based on the false premise of mutual love.

Beta men are internalizing hamstering.

"She said she loved me so that fling didn't really count. It doesn't really mean anything compared to the 10 years we've been together."

"It was only a blowjob. She said he made her do it, I wouldn't want her to have been bashed by some thug at a nightclub. She did the right thing."

"Love is forgiving your partner when they've made a mistake."

Urk.

TheJessee · 2015-06-27T14:36:15+00:00

Don't worry, all the lesbian feminists will feel what divorce rape is like in 15 years and then they'll protest for new laws

Sawagurumi · 2015-06-28T10:44:26+00:00

I just commented in the gay marriage = divorce reform post, but this is actually a far more appropriate place, apologies for the dup.

The great majority of divorces are instigated by women, generally by no-fault because "I'm not haaappy!". Women then go for 50% of the assets, even if they have contributed little. They also generally get the children, yet the man pays for it. In some states, up to 20% of the prison population is made up of men whose only crime is that they don't earn enough as an indentured slave to pay the alimony and CS amounts the court decided he should - regardless of what he could actually afford. The woman and child apparently should remain in 'the style to which they have become accustomed', but whether the man can maintain that style for himself is considered completely irrelevant.

In the UK, marriage rates are down more than 40% since 1970 (start of 2nd wave feminism; anyone know US/other country figures?), and getting worse. Why? Just read any time marriage is mentioned here, and you get: DO. NOT. MARRY. Because it is a really shitty deal for men. But without a stable relationship to raise children, you don't have a stable civilization. In particular, boys cannot learn to be men (thank goodness for the internet, and authors like Rollo and Jack Donovan).

To save this society, we would need big changes to stop incentivising women to divorce.

1) No no-fault divorce if there are children. There has to be an extremely good reason to mess up children's lives like that.

2) No alimony. Why should a man be financially responsible for a woman who is not his wife? Made sense when women couldn't go out to work, now it makes none.

3) No need for a pre-nup, whatever each owns prior to a marriage they automatically own after it dissolves. Assets acquired during a marriage are divided by means test: whoever contributed most gets most.

If there are children (in spite of point 1):

4) access is 50:50 by default, there has to be extremely good reasons for the state to condone a parent having no access to his or her child, and vice versa.

5) No child support. Whoever has the child, pays for the child. Since it is by default 50:50, that means each pays 50%.

That effectively removes the incentive for women to get divorced, and in turn resolves the main issues that prevent men from getting married. None of that will come about just because gays get married, women will still be favoured. The only thing that would change it is if it becomes even worse for women than making these things happen. That is what is happening, because what is worse for women is having no long term relationship, and no children, at all. http://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/the-bitter-harvest-of-feminism.html

changshuaidiao · 2015-06-27T10:17:23+00:00

The SCOTUS decision has made it so that there will finally be equality and fair treatment in all aspects of marriage for all me who are smart enough to marry other men. Not so much for those who marry women.

NeoreactionSafe · 2015-06-27T15:51:30+00:00

Marriage 1.0 was actually a really good deal.

Red Pill seems to be still holding the lingering leftover of the Beta Powerless mindset when it tries to push the notion that we never want to reproduce even if the laws were on our side.

Look... I get it... the laws are insane and gay means happy so we live in an age where everyone wants to be happy, happy, happy all the time. The modern form of marriage is entirely gay and actually has been since the passage of No Fault Divorce.

Masculinity is about Power.

The Beta FEARS Power... his guilt is so strong he denies he wants Power, but Red Pill is here to assure you Power is "okay".

It's okay to have wanted to have a real family. You aren't evil for being masculine.

Just because you accept your masculinity and accept your desire for Power doesn't change the fact you don't have Power. That's the important point, you want Power, but realize it's being prevented by the State through Feminism.

Real marriage in the masculine sense is actually illegal.

Only gay marriage is legal.

norstar1 · 2015-06-28T06:32:45+00:00

I pray that in the next decade we will see a resurgence in red pill thinking amongst the male population. The tides of whorish feminism are at a crest, with betas amongst its ranks. Maybe when these betas are older and realize that pussy isn't what they dreamt it to be worth, we will get some snowball effect with TRP.

I know that many atheists here may find it to be a bitter truth, but the biggest ally to TRP are classic Abrahamic theists. All three big ones (maybe not Judaism) have had this particular aspect down right for centuries-- they know women to be manipulative snakes.

thick_knees · 2015-06-28T11:33:55+00:00

I always have faith in the common sense gene in humans. We couldn't have this far without it. Sure there is ALOT of dead weight (SJWs, MRAs, feminists, hedonists, religious scholars, witch doctors, superstitious nuts, lazy losers, manginas etc.) But the people cunning enough to be in positions of control with regards to decision making (even the women), have some degree of the common sense gene and will always act in favour of what rational men know is right.

bsutansalt · 2015-06-27T15:04:51+00:00

Removed. Message me once you follow the format guidelines here:

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3a0135/announcement_new_thread_requirements/

You're also missing a flair.

MrRexels · 2015-06-27T21:20:18+00:00

I wonder, when two buttfuckers divorce, does the court support the most femenine of the two? Like, in a gay couple whichever one bends over most often gets the children and money?

Title	An interesting thread on the front page with regard to divorce inequality.
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	38
Comments	32
Date	June 27, 2015 7:09 AM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3ba8pa/an_interesting_thread_on_the_front_page_with/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/an-interesting-thread-on-the-front-page-with.34126 https://theredarchive.com/post/34126

Comments