In light of the new members of this sub and people still on the fence about us, I've decided to write a short post that sums us up. People attack us all the time because we're seen as "mysoginistic" and "rape-promoting". TRP is certainly very extreme, but that's the only recourse available to us because we want to avoid the gradual moderation that happened to other subs.

What is TRP? TRP is a set of theories that attempt to explain why sexual relations have changed so much in the last century (at least in the west). Historically, males have always been the one to compete for female attention. This isn't just in humans, but all animals. Male penguins and dolphins give gifts to females penguins and dolphins. Male peacocks have their elaborate designs. Stags have their horns. Other mammals have the strongest similarities.

Society tells us that the best way to compete for the attention of a female is to be Mr. Nice Guy. There seems to be a misconception that Nice GuysTM are just men who expect sex in return for small favors. In the context of society, this is the message that has been sent to our boys for the last few decades. Look at every Disney movie, every TV show, every actual movie that has a romantic subplot. Nice guy gets the girl he likes (or the girl makes the psychopath change but that's another subject). We have been teaching our boys that the optimal way to compete for a girl's attention is for you to be nice to her. Is it wrong, then, that the large majority of men put this teaching into practice when they have been told this their entire life?

Feminists will shout that women are not machines that men insert favors into for sex. Well, then you stop teaching boys to act that way. Stop arguing that it is wrong for a boy to act on his natural urges. Children should be able to play cops and robbers with finger guns without being suspended.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/10/02/florida-boy-8-suspended-from-school-after-using-finger-as-pretend-gun/

That's not the first case, it's not the last. I was in elementary once. I watched these things happen.

TRP rejects catering to a woman's every need and whim in the hopes that she might reward you with sex. Woman may determine who gets to have sex, but men determine who gets to have commitment. We recognise that "Hey, being nice and putting everybody's needs above my own doesn't make me any more likeable". So we turn inwards. We develop ourselves because the answer to attracting better people isn't corny pickup lines or seduction, it is to make yourself attractive. In the end, that is what creates lasting, meaningful, results. If you compete for a woman's attention and lose, then you have nothing. If you build yourself, you will be competing as a side effect and have something even if she gives her attention elsewhere.

You come first. Always. Until you have children, then that priority changes to them first. They will carry on your genes and ensure that you become a part of the human race as long as there are humans around (Pedigree collapse, everybody X amount of generations back is related to everyone today if they are still in the gene pool). And you've won the biological game.

Why is TRP against feminism? I, personally, believe in equal opportunity. There are many things feminism does which I approve of, but many more things that are detrimental to society.

But I'll avoid the normal points. I'll try something original.

Feminism doesn't help women. It hurts them.

Modern day feminists argue that girls should emulate boys, because "You can have it all!"

No. No you can't. Let's look at Japan, where childbirth rates have plummeted. Many women there report unhappiness at their expectations of having to have a career and a family. They try to do both and get burnt out.

I am not against women having a career or choosing motherhood at 18. This is equal opportunity. This is liberty.

I am, however, against motherhood-shaming. Female biology gives women a end period to their fertility.

I am, however, against FeminismTM telling women that it is possible to manage both or instantly switch between the two without advserse effects.Working 60 hours a week shreds your interaction with your children. Women, if you want a career in the professional world, go for it. But know that men are not primarily attracted to your Harvard law degree. No man looks at a woman and instantly thinks "I bet she's a lawyer/CEO. SO. HOT." This isn't to say you should all be at home in the kitchen, but that you can't wait until 35 to decide you want a family.

Because women, you have it worse. You have a biological clock on your fertility. Starting a family becomes much more difficult the more you age. And the majority of men would prefer a 20 year old cashier to a 40 year old lawyer in bed.

Did I also mention that it is extremely easily for any woman with average attractiveness to get laid? Projection would have you believe that it is also extremely easy for all men to get laid, because that is your experience. They don't. Of course, you won't want to get laid by the Nice GuyTM who caters to your every need. You want the attractive men. The ones with confidence. The ones that TRP remolds from sniveling brats. And, of course, at some point, you decide to marry Mr. Nice GuyTM and he's completely unattractive. You find yourself pining for the old days where you could have any of the cute guys at the bar. Mr. Nice GuyTM just seems so unattractive by comparison. No wonder so many more marriages end in divorce and so many more women get married later and later.

You notice something one day. A man actually rejects you. Well ha, there's a few others you can go home with. And over the next few months, you get less attention. And less. And less. Even the losers don't want you anymore. Because now, they've finally achieved the social standing to start getting sex. So why get sex from you when there are plenty more beautiful, younger females for one night stands? For relationships?

"But I have a great personality! All men are shallow! They don't care about personality!" Ah, but did you care about their personality 10 years ago? Also, remember men are much more visually driven than women. For a one night stand, they couldn't care about personality. For a relationship, if there's sex on a constant basis, looks > personality still.

Besides, don't you notice how society lets attractive women be Queen Bees of Bitchiness? Society will put up with anything from an attractive women. Women past their prime aren't nice or kind because they like it. It's because that's their only redeeming factor. By not being attractive, they have to compensate for it somewhere else. Same thing goes for ugly and fat chicks.

Let's flip the coin. Would you expect a man who spends his youth banging supermodels to settle down at 30 with a average girl and be happy? He would feel as if he settled. You feel as if you settled when you get married because of the differential in the quality of men.

Women, you can choose to pursue a high paying career. But know that at some point, men will stop finding you attractive. It will first be the men that you find attractive. And then all the men who you friendzoned in your youth will stop as well. Go waste time, it is your choice. If you are happy without a family at 40, then kudos to you. But don't come crying to the world when men don't find you attractive and you can't start a family.

Men, you can choose to play Call of Duty all day long and not work on your career or skills. Go waste time, it is your choice. If you are happy, then kudos to you. But don't come crying to the world when women don't find you attractive and you can't start a family.

Just know, that your decisions have long term effects. Both sexes have been misled by feminism, but women have it worse because they have less time to realise their mistake.

There should be an automatic disclaimer at the bottom of every post on TRP: "This is not true in every case, we are talking about the average state of society". But of course, if you have to explain that and someone still insists their particular case disproves your entire theory, then they clearly are beyond hope.

Part 1. Constructive criticism and feedback welcome on what I should do for part 2.