Hello gentlemen,
Long time lurker of this sub, I want to say that from MY perception, the root of this rejection of mainstream society (which I reject too, in a different sense) comes from economic changes.
Since the 1960s there, after the golden age of capitalism 1935-1960 (back in the Keynesian era, where the top 1% were taxed at 95%, today it is 27% or something), there have been increasing neoliberal policies that affect male-female relations. Corporate elites have ruined the family unit, and sold women the idea of feminism under the guise of freedom. It is mostly a lie. While liberals in society focus on identity, symbols, society, they miss the economics- and their analysis of today’s society is fundamentally flawed.
My grandfather was able to go to college for 2 years, work as a low-level accountant for his city. Buy a house worth $12,000 with cash with no mortgage (that house today is worth $2 million). My grandmother didn’t work and stayed at home, where she supported their 4 daughters and raised them with respectable, yet strong values. Now a days, you could hardly buy a trailer without taking out a loan, let alone, support a 6 person household on a single middle class income in a city. Wages have not gone up at all since the 60s when adjusted for inflation. How can we let men be men if we impoverish them and trap them in debt bondage?
The 1960s co-opted female liberation as the reason for women entering the job market, yet it was because it actually increased profitability for corporate elites. You would think that a 2 person income would have made us better off, yet this is not the case. Cost of living has gone up, property has gone up, wages have not.
Now a days if a man wants to live the dream, it literally is an ECONOMICALLY impossible task. Both men and women are losing out. Women co-opt feminism, independence, sexual liberation, because they can no longer rely on a man to support them and men, to little fault of their own, can rarely support women or themselves. Women are victims of this change as well, they’ve been falsely sold the idea of sexual liberation, yet no women feels much better about themselves after sleeping around. They are no freer. Liberals have lied to them as well. They’ve pitted us against each other, distracting us with debates about society and culture while they empty our pockets and take away our economic freedom and thus, our ability to counter such a culture. There is little incentive for women to follow the traditional path now a days, but they are no happier now. We have to look at why that is objectively.
I believe that in the name of increasing profits, we’ve shifted the conversation away from the material conditions necessary to support our ideals, and instead focused on “values” and “ideas” as the primary source of our problems. The corporate elite are fooling us, leading to extremes both left and right.
[–]Zeeblackbaron 28 points29 points30 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gerdie2[S] 10 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jacke766565 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]marcusaureliuswisdom19 points [recovered] (13 children) | Copy Link
There’s some uncomfortable truth here. What’s omitted; however, is the most uncomfortable truth of all: while lower and middle class society war as a result of sexual hyperactivity, a crashing marriage rate and the destruction of the nuclear family, skyrocketing poverty, inequality, single parenthood, and jettisoning emasculated, absent blue-collar men, the elite of society are doing the exact opposite.
They are marrying just as young as they were in the 50s. Their marriages last longer and are more fulfilling. They are raising children in two-parent households in highly-desired secluded HOA enclaves with walls and guards and infinite resources for their children. The children enjoy grandma and grandpa’s stories of their family’s legacy built on grandpa’s real estate empire on a daily basis (grandma and grandpa live close by and have stayed together since high school). The children’s parents were groomed to self-select since they were in primary school—attending private schools and universities and through the fraternity/sorority lavaliering process. They used family resources to buy a home together early in their twenties and start another family business with start-up capital. They leverage this launch point to buy appreciable assets and leveraging them further with cheap money to continue to stack the family legacy higher and higher.
I have personal knowledge of this process; I’ve lived it.
The biggest lie ever told to the American people is to copy the archetypes in media and their friends. In reality, if you want to be successful, don’t follow your peers, follow your betters.
https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/maraprmay-2016/why-is-marriage-thriving-among-and-only-among-the-affluent/
[–]YouExpensive12304 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
Yes smart/elite people tend to have good lives, but should smart/elite people actively destroy the underclass? Or should they help the underclass?
Are the smart people psychopaths or good empathetic people?
The ones with the power are definetly the psychopaths.
And if the smart/elites are actively destroying the underclass intentionally than the underclass should unite to destroy the psychopathic overclass
[–]marcusaureliuswisdom11 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
My proposition, which bears out in the reality I live every day, is that there is a fundamental misunderstanding in society about the “elites.” There are the visible elite—politicians, celebrities, new tech and VC rich. I’m not referring to them. I’m referring to the invisible elite—the multi-millionaire who lives in Crystal Cove who owns a plumbing business with a hundred trucks that his grandfather built a century ago; the La Jolla businessman who started buying up appreciable industrial and mixed-use office space in 1970; the Tucson patriarch who invested in one of the first solar energy companies in America; the Montana cattle rancher who took over several tens of thousands of acres from his father, who took over from his father’s father.
The two “elites” could not be more different. One class is the enemy to free men: the authoritarian (your word: psychopath) elite who actively manipulate culture to keep the lower classes warring. The other class consists of long-standing family legacies headed by patriarchs whom men seeking success should copy and mentor under.
[–]gerdie2[S] 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Senior Contributordr_warlock 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TyranaSoreWristWreck 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]gerdie2[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]marcusaureliuswisdom3 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
That’s fair, and I’m not insinuating you omitted anything intentionally. I was simply adding some color to your commentary. Ultimately, my point is not that society is breaking down economically and that the wealthy need to be restrained by taxes.
It’s far simpler in my view: the lower and middle classes fail to copy the model of success that works and has been working for elite society for millennia, instead putting their hopes in the degenerate progressive culture fed to them by the media and their peers. Nevertheless, I appreciate your prescient post.
[–]gerdie2[S] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]marcusaureliuswisdom3 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
I think we’re agreeing: the destruction of the nuclear family is a symptom of the lower and middle classes failing to adhere to the model of success that Western society has modeled for millennia—a homogeneous culture with the family (and, frankly, God) at the center of civilization.
The economic and moral consequences you mention are simply symptoms of the above. And they occur every time in history when a society becomes “diverse” or heterogenous. And, every time this happens, the successful continue to model the above correct behavior while the world crashes down upon everyone else. These folks continue to invest in their family legacies, built over generations, and insulate themselves against risk by acquiring appreciable assets, living in exclusive, guarded enclaves away from urban decay, diversifying investment allocation, and educating their progeny in elite, private schools. Life does not stop for them when it does for everyone else—see COVID-19 lockdowns for the best evidence. Society will collapse happen again, who knows when. My simple point: better copy the model of success before it’s too late.
[–]gerdie2[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]YouExpensive12301 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes there are the corporations pushing this for exactly that reason but there are also other groups pushing it for non-economic reasons more through a racial lens think of those guys who produce black male white female propaganda 24/7. Hell even google "happy white woman" and click images
[–]1BlondeHornyElf 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zino1932 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
A degree for your dad is the equivelant of 2 years of hard programing today. I dare you to find a job that can't afford you a living wage, a family wage. And the irony is - you will probably have more choice, more flexibility than your dad if you are decent at your job.
That 12 000 home, is the equivalent of a 300k-600k home outside of major cities. With a high skill job, if you don't NEED to live in the major cities - you can buy a home without a mortage. If you aren't scared of mortages like a idiot - you can even buy an amazing home outside of major cities. A home your father would probably never even dared to dream of.
The life is still there. The details just differ. But you look just at the finish line like a woman. You want to have the 20 year old benefits, without the 20 year old grind.
Also the home isn't worth 2 million - there's just a lot of floating capital in the real estate market - dumb capital.
And guess what motherfucker - because of neoliberalism your dad didn't end up working for the state with a fixed job for life, his productivity limited by union contracts and his home growing 2000% in value because of lack of regulations.
Do not dare blame the system because you aren't willing to do what your father did - grind away 20 years in a job he didn't like on most days because the alternative would make him a loser. Put away childish wants like a hotrod, cancun trips, the latest TV appliances - and just save and invest in their home.
[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]gerdie2[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]1scissor_me_timbers00 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1meerita 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CircuitCityBitch 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ChrimsonChin988 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DareyFathom -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]gerdie2[S] 12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]1SeasonedRP 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]YouExpensive12300 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Income tax but how about small business, or corporate taxes
[–]gerdie2[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link