Doc Love: look him up. He's a redpiller avant la lettre.

He talks about a thing called Interest Level (IL): Her interest level (in you/him) is the one that matters. Your (his) interest level has less (almost no) significance in the relationship. If her IL is high, then no matter what your IL is, the relation has the possibility of existing. If hers is low however, then no matter what yours is, the relationship is doomed to fail.

He also says that once her IL drops below 50%, the relationship can not be saved anymore. It can, so to speak, never go back to 50% or more. For example: friend zone = below 50% = no turning back. Rejection same thing.

I know lots of people have written about the friend zone, its dangers and methods of escaping it. However I'm more interested in rejection as a whole. I'd personally classify the friend zone as a type of rejection, which puts you in the lowest registers of IL below 50%, 10% for example. Lighter forms of rejection (loss of contact for example, flaking a date) might put you in higher registers of IL below 50% (40%). If you agree with this, would you disagree with Doc Love ("below 50% and you're out") and say that getting back into the game (back to above 50%) is easier if you're in the 40% range than if you're in the 10% range? Is the friend zone one of the most difficult positions to get out of?

Why I'm asking? Because rejection seems to be a bigger (initial) drive than TRP. I'm tempted to think rejection is the cause of TRP. Add to that the fact that rejection is object exclusive (we have been rejected by women insofar as we've been rejected by those specific female persons), my conclusion would be that, at least initially, we want to fuck those who rejected us. One of the major messages of TRP is to transform this energy stemming from the sexual hate towards the rejector into positive self improvement. However, even after successful self-transformation, we still care more about fucking that original rejector than fucking an other girl.

Thoughts?