The feminists like to employ a concept called intersectionality that is a very powerful analytical tool, they're just too biased to realize its stark conclusions. For example, how does a black male slave on a plantation oppress his white female master? He doesn't. Therefore, the notion that all men oppress all women must be considered false, even generally. They really only use the theory to dubiously say that modern black (latino, etc.) women are even more oppressed than black men. Quite self-serving, but there is an actual logic to the theory sans feminist misappropriation that is incredibly useful to the manosphere.

Political discourse almost completely aside, as an anti-feminst Marxist, I feel the need to share the model so that guys here can use it for their collective benefit, and maybe even use it somehow in debate against feminists (something you should probably just never do, debating feminists).

I've been around TRP since it started, and there used to be countless arguments about what is redpill behavior, what Alpha really means, who is Alpha, etc. It was confusing to speak of, and left me to hammer it out personally while trying to explain redpill understanding to others. That was a debacle. There was no agreement on terms, everybody wants to think they and their idols are Alpha. 'Is Bill Gates redpill? Is he an Alpha? What is the difference?' Well, most of that has been nailed down here now by the veterans, but I still don't see use of simple intersectional terms in field reports and anecdotes, or anywhere.

'Redpill Beta' and 'bluepill Alpha'.

Primative Definitions:

Redpill can be defined as an applicable understanding of female evolutionary psychology. Conversely, bluepill is a general lack of this comprehensive understanding.

Alpha behavior is first-order congruence with what arouses women sexually. Beta behavior is congruent with what generally attracts long-term pairing.

The 'ubermensch', the male 10 has maximized both behavioral qualities. Redpill Alpha+Beta. We will come back to that in more complex detail.

Their Intersection:

Without the proper understanding of female nature, there is little chance an individual will maximize either and/or both qualities. A man can be so good-looking throughout his early life, that he learns to deal with women in an Alpha fashion, and he can, through process, come to an eventual redpill understanding. He must, or he will blow it all on endless incongruent beta reactions and take whatever ass will stick around long enough, finally cashing in when he settles. A recipe for disaster.

A man can be so well-off and providerly, that he may not ever realize there is a reason women are only attracted to him for his money and don't actually want to bone him one bit. If this Beta does start to understand, he gains redpill awareness. He is not instantly transformed into an Alpha, he goes from bluepill Beta to redpill Beta.

The bluepill Alpha is a distasteful sight to a redpiller of any status. Almost undeserving, definitely a waste of good stock. So much potential, so little understanding, so many guaranteed pitfalls. This is most good looking guys. They have game they've picked up, they just don't see the dead-ends coming with each iteration. They bang around the room in the dark and learn where the furniture is the hard way. They get shacked up and inevitably lose "it". No bluepill Alpha can win in the end. They will be betaized. Their alpha quality is as solid as their redpill education. One will only bang into so much furniture before choosing a 'safe' path, compliance and negotiated desire. One megahot chick busting their balls is all it takes. One pregnancy. Et cetera.

The redpill Beta is in a much better position from a running perspective, from the context of the colored pills moving forward. He knows why he sucks, he gets to work on it, he will be better or die trying. He will ascend to redpill Alpha for life while the bluepill Alpha inevitably bites the dust in his vaginally induced lockdown.

Now, what's different between alpha behavior and alpha status is embodiment. An Alpha certifiably embodies alpha traits. The bluepill Alpha is an alpha by coincidence, but he gets girls' panties wet no less. The redpill Beta is a beta by design (more precisely, an initial lack of design). All it takes is implementing a new design and time. The bluepill Alpha is a shaky tower, only founded on youthful good looks and the minor brutal understandings that allowed him growing up. A redpill Alpha is supreme, and a bluepill beta is a hopeless case.

When discussing people we know, it will clear up almost everything contextually important to state if they are bluepill Beta, bluepill Alpha, redpill Beta, and redpill Alpha. You basically need say no more to explain the individual, and can then expound upon their literal actions.

For example, I know a bluepill Beta guy who got divorce-raped and posts on Facebook like he is pulling his hair out. Still in love with this woman, yet hates her, wishes she would get back with him, rants about her cheating on him. He is hopeless. Tells me I'm right and that he should have taken my advice every time he realizes he fucked up (no contact, lift), continues his stupid shit.

I know a redpill Beta guy who got left by his ex after fucking up hard at being his own man, and is finding his alpha, all the while knowing what it is he is shooting for and how to judge his results. He knows what Alpha is and how to attain it, is not it yet. He will be certifiably Alpha when he embodies those traits.

I know a bluepill Alpha, who married a girl he thought was wholesome and now has a sexless marriage, when he was pounding pussy up till the moment he committed to her.

If I ever meet a redpill Alpha, I take notes. These are my teachers.

The 'ubermensch' is so rare that he might as well not be named, and is a matter of slight coincidence when you consider the possibility of being able to provide maximally without being born an heir to some industry. The thing is, the redpill Alpha has the ability to temper his alpha behavior with the level of beta qualities that will endear this facet of him to a high-quality woman who actually does need it enough that she is in the relationship for the long-run.

Lastly, to bring it full circle, you can describe 'bluepill Betas with Alpha traits'. How is Bill Gates, such an obvious life-long beta herb, such a boss? A titan of industry!? Well, he is an alpha in business, that just doesn't translate to his overall demeanor. He is the bluepill Beta with alpha traits.

Bluepill Alpha with beta traits (a given), redpill Alpha with beta traits (ubermensch-esque), and redpill Beta with alpha traits (low-smv redpiller) round up the 3-dimensional intersection. Understand? It doesn't help much to just call someone Redpill, Alpha, Bluepill, or Beta. That's what all of Rollo Tomassi's case studies of friends are about. Making this distinction.

TLDR; redpill Beta, bluepill Alpha. Use these terms to distinguish between guys with low SMV who "get it" (female evo-psych), and guys who have a high SMV but don't "get it", respectively. Also, 'bluepill Beta' for a total herb, and 'redpill Alpha' for a champion of tail, slayer of poon, sultan of twat.