I'm interested in hearing seddit's opinion on what the difference is between a good FR and a bad one. I personally believe results are not what make an FR, but how reflective and insightful they are. Obviously, basic details and presentation are key. References to material read and employed would be great.

I personally have no problem reading 20,000 characters, as long as the writing is done well and is full of usable and relatable content. I noticed at one point that people were complaining about hearing from AFC's about overcoming AA or whatever. I disagree with this because I prefer to think of seddit as an encouraging and supportive place, and everybody has to start somewhere.

I think if this discussion produces some useful discourse, it should be compiled and added to the side bar or wiki. Thoughts?