Another data mining study slams the manosphere

UsedToBeRadical · 2019-07-10T18:54:22+00:00

Who cares? Men who have been abused by women have the right to vent and be frustrated at women. Male anger, even if it exists for legitimate reasons, will be labeled "misogyny" by these fools. A man can literally be destroyed by a woman and he will be labeled a misogynist for simply being angry.

Oh and by the way, I'm a woman and mixed-raced. I support the MRM 100%

tenchineuro · 2019-07-10T19:26:56+00:00

Wow, no mention of r/mensrights.

PeonSupreme · 2019-07-10T20:17:33+00:00

<<as the Toronto van attack proved, they can inspire real-world violence.>>

The Toronto van attack didn’t prove anything. This reporter could no more make the connection between angry rhetoric in a sub like this and the violence in Toronto, than I could between angry rhetoric in a radical feminist sub and the brutal murder of Rhuan Maycon da Silva Castro by his lesbian parents.

I don’t expect much from the advocacy journalism that has sprung up across the internet like weeds, but I would hope that a reporter covering scholarly research would know better than to infer a causal relationship between speech and action. Then again, that journalist wasn’t covering scholarly research. She was covering propaganda.

lostapwbm · 2019-07-10T20:42:54+00:00

It's a bunch of bullshit for a number of reasons.

First, the 'researchers' claim to be studying 'men's rights' and don't actually use the MENS RIGHTS SUBREDDIT in their research. It doesn't pass the sniff test from the start.

Second, the spamming of Alek Minassian. Prove he was on r/MGTOW. I'll wait while you get that evidence together. It ought to be easy.

Third, the 'study' is nothing but a keyword search and tabulation of the number of times the words appear, not the context in which the words are used, as the 'researchers' themselves admit in the Discussion portion of their paper.

This is 'feminist research' right here. It's nothing but 'teacher, teacher, he said a naughty word'!

The whole point of the exercise is not to discern the truth but to attempt to shore up their biases (as bell.hooks admits in her book, Feminism Is For Everybody).

user_miki · 2019-07-11T22:47:30+00:00

Imagine how many hours, months, years spend and did not find anything to make sense in their head, I start doubting seriously about the intelligence of these so called researchers.

r/MGTOW (home of all those “men going their own way”) was the most hostile, the most likely to make threats of physical violence,

and after all these "researches" they lie big time. MGTOW never, ever advocated for physical violence against anybody,in fact the users that do that are banned.

Egalitarianwhistle · 2019-07-10T18:51:22+00:00

Can anyone find the original study? This article seems disingenuous for a couple reasons. First, there is no acknowledgement that the moderators un manosphere are more lax. In r/feminism and r/twoxchromosones there us preemptive censorship. This is by design in order to widen the Overton window. Sure you get some assholes, but assholes are i inherently self filtering.

That being said, the racism and misogyny that sometimes shows up on the periphery is usually addressed and talked about instead of deleted. I cant vouch for r/mgtow but r/mensrights is surprisingly articulate.

Seconsly, the phenomenon demonstrated by r/menkampf is not looked into. I would wager to say there is more outright androgyny in r/feminism than misogyny on r/mensrights.

But this article makes no attempt to analyse any of this. Instead it just says they are all hate groups.

PSA: Anyone who doesnt agree with your worldview is a nazi. Prove me wrong, nazi.

Title	Another data mining study slams the manosphere
Author	PeonSupreme
Upvotes	16
Comments	16
Date	July 10, 2019 6:36 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cbkjhg/another_data_mining_study_slams_the_manosphere/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/another-data-mining-study-slams-the-manosphere.873868 https://theredarchive.com/post/873868

Comments