Bluepillers tend to be highly educated and rather intellectual. They approach various topics from an intellectual mindset and the belief that humans act (or should act) logically.

This is why "privileged classes" is such a popular concept in feminism. People look at the world and see men in positions of power. Men and women are both humans, so if one group has more power than the other that must mean they are privileged. Moreover, if all humans are fundamentally equal, then we need to equalize the two groups by bringing one up which by default brings the other down.

This is also why therapy and communication are so often espoused as a solution to a problem. Here are two people, just sit down and talk it out.

This is also why they get so disgusted with so many red pill beliefs. Women like psychopaths? Stop talking to her once she puts you in the friend zone? If you believe that people act based on their intellectual best interests, then redpill assertions look disgusting. Why would someone ever accuse another person of rape, falsely? That makes no sense, from an intellectual standpoint.

Redpillers, on the other hand, view the world as highly predictable but believe that human behavior is very often counterintuitive. Based on anecdotal evidence, they create a theory based on how people respond and not how they wish they responded. There is little social engineering involved, rather they try to manipulate innate behavior.

Redpillers believe that humans do not act based on their intellectual best interests but rather that humans act on deep-seated, primal urges. The limbic system overwhelms the forebrain and forces people to behave in ways that seem rather nonlogical.

I am biased. I would argue that stupid people tend to be redpill, smart people tend to be bluepill, and that very smart people tend to be redpill. What are your thoughts?