Feminist women are cucking themselves for women who are actually attractive

redmachines · 2015-12-21T00:29:22+00:00

Only hot girls benefit from feminism; a futile attempt by unattractive women to still be relevant to the world. It is hilarious to see these fem-cucks wage war...

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Huh? If anything, feminism benefits ugly women MORE than attractive women. Attractive women have always had it on easy mode. Feminism has given ugly women the chance to opt out of committing to and having sex with ugly/low status men, whether that be by choosing to stay single and childless and support themselves, or having lots of casual sex (and potentially children) with more attractive men who would never actually commit to her.

Stacie will have it easy no matter what, but the truth is, a lot of ugly women would rather be career/achievement focused, or opt for casual sex and single motherhood, than commit to a low SMV man. Low SMV men lose the most.

EDIT: Also I'm talking about women with SMV 4 or lower here. If we were talking about AVERAGE women I'd actually kind of agree with you. I think average women are the biggest female losers when it comes to feminism. Hotties be hotties, ugly women have more options, but a lot of average women end up squandering opportunities.

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]GridReXXit be like that25 points26 points27 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]wont_tell_i_refuseRed Orchestra10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]downunderitNon-Red Pill Feeeemale33 points34 points35 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-3 points-3 points 10 years ago | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

[+]redmachines[S] -6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[+]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed-6 points-5 points-4 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed-5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed-5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill15 points16 points17 points 10 years ago (40 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

yes I created a throwaway and made a post on it. For once I scored a date with an extremely insanely cute brown guy and asked for advice on /r/relationships and they all just bashed me.

I did what they call a "shit test" and he was just so calm.

I asked him on the date what he thought of feminism. He stared at his drink and said some things about women being like seashells. "if you ever hold one up to your ear you can hear them scream".

I asked him if he was red pill and he said "what". So I told him to forget it. But that stupid bugger wouldn't stop asking what I accused him of and couldn't remember the name. He was demanding me to tell him so he could google it but I didn't. He said he'll figure it out when he thinks about it.

Then he texted me a week later after I spam texted him and more or less called me a retard and asked me to get help.

[–]HoxHoundEfilist9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]cloudstryfe1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed-2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]sivervipagrey pill3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]bigskymind2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]redmachines[S] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

THERE ARE DOZENS OF US! DOZENS!

seriously though, the TRP sub is only about 140,000 subscribers and the extended "man-o-sphere" around it brings in another few hundred thousand.

The chances of meeting a redpiller in the wild is tiny. And assuming every handsome guy is some evil jock trying to pump and dump you is just as bad if not worse than a terper thinking that all women are hypergamous gold digging sluts, because you are not the one approaching, you are selecting from those who approach.

Guess what? many TRP members like long term relationships as well, if it is with the right girl. We are not all trying to spin plates. That type of person is incredibly easy to spot, TRP or not. TRP even teaches men to be open and honest with our plates from the beginning.

And if a guy internalizes TRP principles and actually gets to the acceptance stage (which you have clearly not reached), he would actually make a great partner for you. Read what acceptance actually means:

Acceptance: "Women aren't bad. My expectations of them, and theirs of me, were based on faulty premises. They are creatures of instinct, just like I am... but of different instincts. If I learn what those instincts are, and teach them about mine, we can develop realistic expectations of each other and get along just fine."

and that is really all TRP is trying to do. We are not demons, just guys trying to figure out this convoluted dating market. Substitute men for women in the above quote, and you are really in the same boat as the rest of us.

[–]AreYouRedPill0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel-2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]MagicGainbowKeepin' it real, havin' a feel0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cocaine_faceRed Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]cocaine_faceRed Pill Man2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]cocaine_faceRed Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AreYouRedPill0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]appencapndefender of fee fees9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]EdenBlade475 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (72 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link

Women get more rights than men

Ahahahahahah hahahah ahahahahah hahahahaha you're hilarious.

Q. Do men have to sacrifice large chunks of their working career to get through pregnancies and care of small children? (Without such sacrifices, the human species would end)

A. No.

Q. Do men bleed every month and have the expense of buying tampons and things, plus deal with all the complications and intense pain periods sometimes bring - such as endometriosis and excessive blood loss?

A. No.

Q. Do men have to pump their bodies with artificial hormones that alter natural bodily functions and often lower sex drive (the pill and other hormonal contraceptives) just to have sex?

A. No

Q. Are men ever faced with an unwanted baby developing in their bodies?

A. No.

Q. Does an individual male represent his gender in the workforce or when starting up a business? (Women are seen as representing their gender. If an individual woman fails or makes a mistake in the workforce, it's "women just can't do that job")

A. No

[–]obstinatebeagle-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]dejarnjc3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do women make up 93% of workplace deaths?

Women die at the workplace at a greater percentage than do men. Having children is commonly called "women's work" and "a woman's job".

In 2013, 18 out of every 100,000 women died in the USA as a result of childbirth. In 2013, 2.3 out of every 100,000 men died in the USA as a result of a workplace accident.

Are women now a definite minority of college graduates and falling even further?

Most of those women will go into teaching and nursing - which men don't want to do. Men can do these things if they want to. I'd support encouraging more men into teaching and nursing. Many men prefer construction and manufacturing.

Are women 93% of the prison population?

That's a silly argument. Do women commit most of the murders? No. Do women commit most of the rapes? No. Do women commit most of the theft? No.

While it might be true women get lighter sentences in some instances, in general, men are committing most of the crime.

The biggest issue facing young men in terms of crime is poverty. We don't need to "fix" men. We need to fix poverty. It's not that poverty affects men more than women (it actually affects women more) but because men's sense of his masculinity is tied to his income and his job, if he doesn't see a future for himself, the consequences can be dire.

[–]ljsjdoj009e9we 1 points1 points1 points 10 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Getting preferential hiring over men isn't fair...to men.

Hundreds of years of affirmative action for men in the workforce wasn't fair to women. Women don't want to kick men out of the workforce though or pay them half of what they get. Get the irony?

Women getting default custody isn't fair...to men.

No, it is not. In the past, most judges have been MEN and have made those decisions. It's very complex. If a woman has given up her career to have children and if the man intends to continue his career and he works long hours, the children are generally better off with the mother.

I'd like to think that we should make workplaces that are fairer to people with children and that women could continue their careers, and then if a couple splits up, the man and woman could have equal custody. Win/win, right? but we need the workplace to be fairer on working women with children first.

Men getting arrested in domestic violence situations isn't fair...to men.

It's fair if it's the man battering the woman. I think we need to move towards the gaining of evidence in domestic violence situations, so that no one is unfairly arrested. Not always possible when it's a life or death situation though.

Stop trying to act like a victim because of biology. That's ridiculous. You're insane.

If you're able to dispute me, I'll accept that I'm being ridiculous.

Thanks for the personal analysis of my mental state but you have no evidence for it.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What do you think live was like for blacks in the 1800s? Live for women in the past was far far better than any minority and was not even close to oppression.

Women want jobs they haven't earned, plain and simple. If you really need preferential hiring while being the majority of the population, you need to admit you're just not as "equal" as men.

Better off with the mother? Hm the stats show the children are far far better off with the father. http://brandongaille.com/19-compelling-motherless-children-statistics/ https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/ I don't even have to explain how single motherhood is the NUMBER ONE predictor of that child being a runaway, rapist, addict, ect.

If you want "FAIR" workplaces, you do not belong in a capitalist society. Businesses want to make money. End of story. I believe North Korea is openly communist why don't you go try there.

You see this is why I personally don't believe women should have a serious stake in running a country. China isn't fucking around trying to turn corporations into "safe spaces". They hire the best person for the job. Point black. And that's why we don't stand a chance in the future.

If the male was battering the woman? What if I told you they were equally likely to be hurting each other? And that women were more likely to be non-reciprocally hurting the male? And I'm sure you already knew this, you just keep spouting out lies.

"Women are more likely than men to initiate violence in their relationships and are more likely to be aggressive more frequently”. He addresses the myth that women are only violent in self-defense. “29% of female college students admitted to physically attacking their boyfriends when no threat was perceived.” http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2005.079020

[–]TomHicksAntifeminist sans pills-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MorpheusGodOfDreamsCaught Red Handed0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's easy to say "oh, those are consequences of biology" and dismiss it all. Really, really easy. Yet, women are stuck making these enormous sacrifices - which in the past made them unable to support themselves and children.

In the depression era, if a man died or abandoned his family, the woman had no way of feeding her family. She had to send the kids away to relatives and workhouses, and then go and work as a servant in someone's house. If she did get a job in a factory or where the workforce was predominately male, she made only half of what a man did (53%)

Why the FACK would women want to keep signing up for that load of shit???

That is why feminists fought so hard in that era. A woman should be able to get a job and support her family. And also get a job when she is single and go do all the things that men could do. Rather than have to hope she found a man with a good enough job to support her and who would not abandon the family/ become an alcoholic / spend the money on gambling.

It is NOT a choice for all women never to have children so stop singing the 'choice' song. If that happens, we'll die out. Some women will always have to carry that burden and associated risks.

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TomHicksAntifeminist sans pills-5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And before and after that era, men were forcibly sent to die in a horrible war. And feminists joined the White Feather campaign to shame and force them to do so. Wanna talk about that?

Yes I do wanna talk about that. I wanna talk about that a lot.

War is tragic and an enormous amount of men sacrificed limbs or their lives - and their mental state.

women were not allowed to fight, despite many wanting to. It was men who refused them.
feminists were split by the war - some wanting pacifism and some wanting to fight
only some feminists joined the white feather campaign

The white feather campaigned was started by a man (an admiral) and some women took up the cause, pinning white feathers to men to shame them into joining the war - the posters were aimed at women, showing them barbarians invading and raping them and killing their children.

At that time, women were told that their role is to create life and men's role is to take it. (That is the exact quote pumped into people's minds back then)

Women were terrified and frustrated by their lack of being able to do anything This is a war started by men that they had no control over. Women who tried to sign up as soldiers were rejected. Women who wanted to go to the from lines as nurses were only allowed if they were trained to a high level, And so female nurse volunteers from the UK had to serve with the Belgium and French forces instead. In WW1, 10,000 UK nurses went to the war to serve.

Some of these "nurses" took up guns as soon as they got to their destinations, eager to fight as soldiers - and this was the only way they could do so. http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02992/Flora_Sandes_2992452a.jpg "Female tommies" also worked as ambulance drivers and took supplies to the trenches - all while bombs fell.

The war split the feminist movement.

The white feather movement was joined by some feminists and some women who were not feminists - some of that group of feminists wanted to be allowed to sign up to fight themselves but they were rejected.

Other groups of feminists were bitterly opposed to the white feather campaign and conscription. They campaigned against it.

You can't make a clear determination about women or about feminists from the white feather campaign.

Had everyone in the UK, France etc turned pacifist, the Germans would have won and then many more men would have died than died in the war. Had women been allowed to volunteer as soldiers, many would have signed up, including feminists.

"Mabel St Clair Stobart, a feminist in her fifties from Dorset. She felt “that if women desired to have a share in the government of the country…they ought to be capable of taking a share in the defence of their country”. She co-founded the Women’s National Service League, which aimed to provide humanitarian assistance to fighting men. When war broke out in August 1914, she travelled to Brussels in advance of the rest of her organisation to offer the League’s services to the Belgian Red Cross. She did so despite warnings that the German Army was advancing upon the Belgian capital. When Brussels was occupied and communications were severed, Stobart was unable to send word to the League to stop its members from travelling into enemy territory, and as she was only an auxiliary to the internationally recognised Red Cross, she risked being treated as an enemy of the German Empire if captured.

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/books/female-tommies-the-frontline-women-of-the-first-world-war-by-elisabeth-shipton/2015210.article

[–]HashtagNotJewish-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later-5 points-4 points-3 points 10 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

Q. Do men have to sacrifice large chunks of their working career to get through pregnancies and care of small children? (Without such sacrifices, the human species would end)

So find a guy willing to be a SAHD

Q. Do men bleed every month and have the expense of buying tampons and things, plus deal with all the complications and intense pain periods sometimes bring - such as endometriosis and excessive blood loss?

you got me there,

Q. Do men have to pump their bodies with artificial hormones that alter natural bodily functions and often lower sex drive (the pill and other hormonal contraceptives) just to have sex?

it why the male contraceptive pill was canceled and we are hoping for vagsel. on a related note, IUD emergency contraceptive abortion and post preggers solutions exist for women. yes i get female BC isn;t perfect but it still more than men have.

Q. Are men ever faced with an unwanted baby developing in their bodies?

no they just have to support a kid that they didn't want or might not be theirs for 18 years. Also 12.5 percent of women adimitted to tampering with mans bc and 40% of women said they would lie about BC to get a man to commit via a pregnancy according to a 2014 Ugov poll.

Does an individual male represent his gender in the workforce or when starting up a business? (Women are seen as representing their gender. If an individual woman fails or makes a mistake in the workforce, it's "women just can't do that job")

yes he does. feminist constantly hold up one man and are like look at this shit head this is what all men are like.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So find a guy willing to be a SAHD

???

Can a man carry a pregnancy? Can he breastfeed? Certainly, he can take over after that time has passed.

it why the male contraceptive pill was canceled and we are hoping for vagsel. on a related note, IUD emergency contraceptive abortion and post preggers solutions exist for women. yes i get female BC isn;t perfect but it still more than men have.

We've had 55 years of women being on artificial hormones. Will be GREAT when vasagel comes in. Abortion is a terrible solution and the absolute last line when contraception fails etc.

no they just have to support a kid that they didn't want or might not be theirs for 18 years.

???

The woman has to support the kid for 18 years also AND give up chunks of her working career AND if the kid is sick or disabled, she might not be able to work at all. There are paternity tests to check if a kid is yours.

yes he does. feminist constantly hold up one man and are like look at this shit head this is what all men are like.

No they don't as a rule. If they did, no feminists would marry or be with men etc Instead, they would treat men the way trp treats women (as fuck toys)

Employers and people who fund start ups (predominately men) absolutely do see a woman as representing her gender, whereas they don't see that with a man. A man can fail and no one sees all men as failures.

[–]TomHicksAntifeminist sans pills-2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The woman can rape a man and collect state-enforced child support from him later.

That case was rare and very wrong. I've only heard of a single case. Ever.

A woman can fool a man into thinking her child is his, and then when he finds out, he will still be liable for child support under threat of imprisonment.

I agree that child support needs an overhaul and can be unfair to the non-custodial parent.

It's a hard situation because when kids are thrust into poverty, the kids lose out. It's one of the reasons I support workplaces being far more family friendly, to make it easier for women to continue their careers and then be in a much stronger position to support themselves and children should they divorce - with equal shared custody being the norm for school aged children, and much more manageable child support amounts (if needed at all).

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Can a man carry a pregnancy? Can he breastfeed? Certainly, he can take over after that time has passed.

artificial wombs are coming soon. that mean you get to be every bit the worker bee that men are.

Abortion is a terrible solution and the absolute last line when contraception fails etc.

like i said not perfect but more than men have

The woman has to support the kid for 18 years also AND give up chunks of her working career AND if the kid is sick or disabled, she might not be able to work at all.

or give custody to the dad.... just at thought

There are paternity tests to check if a kid is yours.

there are only two states in the us where a paternity test will be accepted past the 30 day old mark. and in those two state the limit is 2 years. the rest of the states if you dont challenge paternity within 30 days of birth your on the hook. which can be difficult because the mother could notify you after the 30 days are up which mean you can't even challenge paternity. also there are plenty of case were a crazy woman put down a man when she didnt even have sex with. i knwo a couple gay guys that got dinged for paternity because some crazy woman found there okcupid and put them down. it took them 20k to fight the paternity charge. they both made 100k a year, so they could afford to fight but imagine if you only made like 50 or 30. no way you could fight that. the legal system seriously favors women

A man can fail and no one sees all men as failures.

and a man can fail and end up in the gutter and no one will give a shit either. don't mistake generally apathy toward men by society as men being better off. yes men gt less scrutiny whether it cat calling or as a person because society views men as replaceable cogs. Look at norah vincent when she went undercover as a man or zander keigan. or lets listen to what a trans woman has to say. or my friend has to say .

Bonus media victim hood complexxes

[–]HashtagNotJewish0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 10 years ago | Copy Link

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later-3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]obstinatebeagle1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]cxj75% Redpill Core Ideas-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]obstinatebeagle2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]grendalorRed Rain1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]grendalorRed Rain-4 points-3 points-2 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Feminism promotes women at the expense of men -- at the margins, that is how it works. Feminizing workplaces (and, yes, this is what has happened -- I have seen it with my own eyes over the last 25 years working in corporate America) has not helped men -- this was done to help women be more competitive with men, which, ipso facto, makes men less competitive with women.

Personally I don't care if women want to do whatever they want to do, let them. The group I work with (15 people) is 14 women and one man -- me. So I can and do work well with women and have no issues with that. But feminism hasn't helped my life one iota and has taken away from it in many ways, because women's gains come at the expense of men. I am a survivor in that "culling", but I have seen many others culled in the name of equality among the sexes.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]ColdEiric0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I still don't get where the losses are because of feminism.

Of course you don't. Just like the white pioneers didn't get why the native americans cried when they became fewer and fewer. Just like nazis don't get jewish holocaust tears. Just like KKK doesn't understand Martin Luther King. Just like predators don't get why prey cries. Just like feminists don't get why men cry when men are culled. Because you gain from it.

If a person's health, salary, quality of life, happiness is dependent on not getting a certain something, that person is unable to get that certain something. And feminism gains when masculinity lose, and as long as you identify with feminist instead of a loving sister/wife, you're unable to get it fully. Because you're still a feminist, who like to eat man-flesh, with close resemblance to a orc from the Lord of the rings.

If you'd stop gaining from the death of another man, then you would be able to get it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ColdEiric0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]grendalorRed Rain-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]grendalorRed Rain-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Among the lawyers, total 75 of us or so, 50 are women. The total in the building are around 2000, and about 55% are women.

The hiring practice is to get as many women as possible. So, while there are some areas of the company that are very male heavy (like, say, IT), there are others that have to "make up for that", so there are hiring preferences in favor of women. When we are doing new hire interviews and every resume I see is from a woman, it's fairly obvious (yes, I have asked, and yes there are men who are applying as well). We bend over backwards to hire and promote women -- rankings for this are paid very close attention to by HR and senior management. None of that benefits men one iota, in the least (other than individual men who meet their hiring targets for women and get compensated for that, of course).

This is a Fortune 200 company by the way. Bellweather. Not some outlier.

[–]HashtagNotJewish1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]grendalorRed Rain0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EdenBlade470 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]redmachines[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]wont_tell_i_refuseRed Orchestra-1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]redmachines[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]HashtagNotJewish1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title	Feminist women are cucking themselves for women who are actually attractive
Author	redmachines
Upvotes	0
Comments	131
Date	December 21, 2015 12:29 AM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3xn2fu/feminist_women_are_cucking_themselves_for_women/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/feminist-women-are-cucking-themselves-for-women.277687 https://theredarchive.com/post/277687

Comments