TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Feminism Helps Ethnically Displace Caucasians

IllimitableMan

December 9, 2013
10 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Feminism Helps Ethnically Displace Caucasians
Author

IllimitableMan

Upvotes 10
Comments 55
Date December 9, 2013 5:08 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1sh23t/feminism_helps_ethnically_displace_caucasians/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/feminism-helps-ethnically-displace-caucasians.232165
https://theredarchive.com/post/232165
Red Pill terms in post
feminismthe red pill
Top posts by IllimitableMan

Your struggle and pain? Women neither understand nor give much of a fuck.

1080 upvotes
October 2, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Young Men & The Empathy Gap - "Young male suicide rates have increased 50% since 1994."

1012 upvotes
August 18, 2017
/r/TheRedPill

Red Pill Antibiotic Nuke, Come and Feed

959 upvotes
February 23, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

If your SMV is low, EG: you're fat, poor, unpopular or whatever then forget women/socialising/doing pointless shit for a good year 6 months to a year - just be utterly selfish forget everyone else and go do your own thing.

791 upvotes
March 25, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

The Red Pill, You & Morality

741 upvotes
May 18, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

50 Shades of Red - Wisdom for Men About Women

694 upvotes
July 17, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Everything you need to know about shit tests

661 upvotes
December 15, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

How you know you're Alpha

627 upvotes
November 23, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]Force_Padawan 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like this is a completely normal effect of world globalization. As the human gene pool becomes more global and less local, over thousands of years you will see humanity's skin color move toward something more akin to hair color. At least this is my 2 cents.

[–]3trplurker 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The funny thing is ... the word Caucasian is horribly racist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race

It originally meant the people around the Caucasus Mountains region. Northern European, Southern European, Eastern European, North African and West Asian are all ethically distinct peoples yet get lumped together because their skin is lighter then East/West Africans and South/East Asians. Lumping them together also makes it easier for liberals to claim "privilege" on them without respect to their ethnic origins. The medical community has tried to use skill characteristics to divide everything into three races with some success.

Personally I love to fuck with people by writing down Northern European when I fill out a form.

[–]through_a_ways 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I was especially lulzed by people saying that the Boston bombers weren't "really Caucasian".

American race labels are a thing out of a fantasy book. I suppose it's not a surprise when you see the rest of our laws.

because their skin is lighter then East/West Africans and South/East Asians.

That's not completely true, east Asians are often lighter than these people, but are of a different ancestry, which is visually evidenced by their very different facial features.

[–]3trplurker 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well it was a 19th century comparison so think Indian / Chinese vs English / French. Complete bullshit either way. But hey since some guy in the 19th Century decided my ancestors were part of some "superior" race bullshit I'm somehow completely immune to discrimination and part of some uber elite patriarchal privileged society. Complete Horseshit.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]anon_k 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It has to do with national wealth and the correlation to birth rate. People who come from a poorer country are used to fighting for survival so they tend to reproduce more to guarantee the success of their family. People in stable countries reproduce less because they aren't in survival mode. They are comfortable and their children don't have very many negative factors in life. Immigrants still have this mindset so they tend to have more children than people of the same ethnicity who were born in the country. Their children, granted they are moderately successful will not have as many children as their immigrant parents. That also explains birthrate discrepancies between the poor and rich even in the same country.

[–]autoNFA 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (32 children) | Copy Link

I don't know what the situation is like in Europe, but this ignores ethnic mixing in the USA. My family are south Asian immigrants to the USA, but a large fraction of us are dating and/or marrying people of other races/ethnicities. I have half-white cousins, I've mostly dated white girls, and all of my cousins around my age are dating white or east Asian people. We celebrate multiple sets of holidays. The way you talk about it, the ethnic groups are totally separate slices of the pie chart, but that's not the case at all in my experience. These groupings aren't fixed at all - "Caucasian" as a distinct identity is a very recent concept.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

In the uk ethnicities tend to be distinct as there's no shared sense of national identity like there is in the US. People identify with a land they weren't born in as englishness is vaguely defined and not popular, patriotism is vilified in this country as a by product of world war 2. In Germany it's even worse. It's really a question of integration. White Caucasian is specifically what I'm getting at, what you describe, racial mixing, lowers the indigenous population by creating mixed race people anyway, it combines ethnicities.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The article is partly about what you as saying with the social engineering that has lead to what you are describing.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

There are many of us who don't want ethnic mixing anywhere. The fact that you're asian and dating white women is one thing-- it's far and away better than a black dating white women-- but many of us believe that white women are for white men and asian women are for asian men. So perhaps you'd consider dating among your own.

"Caucasian" as a distinct identity is a very recent concept.

Caucasian as a distinct identity is as old as caucasians. The idea that we are not allowed to have our own racial identity is just another assault on whites by the multicultural crowd.

[–]TheNicestMonkey 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

many of us believe that white women are for white men and asian women are for asian men. So perhaps you'd consider dating among your own.

Well that's on you to convince "your" women of that. I'm not sure why he should give two fucks what you think he should do.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

We can also go to some degree to convince the males. Times are changing and not necessarily in the direction that the supporters of degeneracy would like.

[–]TheNicestMonkey 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Well yeah. You can get your people together and agree to keep it all in the family. Of course in your logic it takes 2 white people to make another white person and since it takes 9 months for a girl to have a kid ... you'd be best served making sure your ladies are on your game plan. Because let's be honest - autoNFA really doesn't give a shit.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

When they're not in our lands it won't be a problem.

Also there's such a thing as the deterrence effect. Big changes are coming.

[–]TheNicestMonkey -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

As has been said in every country with significant immigration. You're British so all this is relatively new to you (last 60 odd years or so). However in the States there have been successive waves of immigrants for the last 200 years (starting with the Irish, then the Italians, then the Chinese, and now Hispanics). At every step along the way someone wanted to kick those people out and...that just didn't happen.

Big changes are not coming and it makes far more sense to figure out how you're going to act within the prevailing paradigm (as basically everyone on this sub does with feminism) than to fantasize about the Turner Diaries as if they are going to happen.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The hilarious part is all the whites, Africans, and Asians came here from somewhere else, the natives got here via a land bridge long before that. All of us came from the Rift Valley in Africa. Yet people think they are special and want to believe they are superior for any reason, when really the differences are miniscule regarding race.

[–]vaporfarts0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Who all developed for thousands of years in totally different enviroments.

Look up MAOA genes.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Big changes are not coming

Wait and see.

I don't think you're going to like it at all.

[–]autoNFA 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So perhaps you'd consider dating among your own.

Why would I do that? I don't really have a preference one way or the other, but there simply aren't nearly as many south Asians as whites/east Asians around where I live, so I'll just help myself.

[+]MarkarthAlchemist -8 points-7 points-6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You'll be getting low class women if they're interested in asians.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I will fuck whatever color of female I want to fuck, thanks. It does not bother me to see a black guy fucking a blonde because there are millions of blondes, and it also opens up black women to fuck. The contrast in skin tone is interesting when I'm fucking them.

The genetic difference in race is as good as nonexistent because it is adaptation, not genetic mutation. About 150,000 years ago we were all black and living in Africa, so racism is pretty fucking stupid, ignorant and myopic.

Culture is something else and doesn't depend on race, some cultures are more fucked up than others, some are better but none are perfect. I sure as fuck don't want to live in the feminist culture of Sweden, and I'd rather not live in the Islamic culture either, and watching the culture I grew up in getting changed bothers me because elements I don't like are being injected to it, and its keeping the racist bullshit from a fucked up past.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I sure as fuck don't want to live in the feminist culture of Sweden

Right, it needs to be fixed.

I'd rather not live in the Islamic culture either

I agree. Let's stop importing it. Culture is the extended phenotype.

The genetic difference in race is as good as nonexistent because it is adaptation, not genetic mutation

Untrue. There is a 15 point IQ disparity between the average IQs of blacks and whites, and the disparity, on average, is halved for each white ancestor. This is just one of many differences and you know that.

About 150,000 years ago we were all black and living in Africa, so racism is pretty fucking stupid, ignorant and myopic.

This is incorrect as well. There have been archaeological finds in Britain and other places in northern Europe dating back 500,000 years or more.

Human history is not nearly as clear as you seem to think.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Homosapiens or other hominids at half a million years? You can assume other raves are inferior all you like, and try to claim I agree with you, but I haven't seen it during my extensive travels around the world.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not assuming, quoting IQ statistics. Inferior in IQ.

[–]red-guard0 points 12 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

So basically you're saying IQ scores are directly related to the genotypic differences between races?

I would worry about not spreading my seed if I was you.

[–]vaporfarts0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lets start a breeding camp. You bring your white women, I'll bring mine.

[–]Space_Tourist 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But I really enjoy my asian women (I'm white)...they tend to be perfect companions for red pill men.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's a different situation for us because of the far lesser load of having children for males (face it, we've been blowing that lesser load on nothing since puberty) and in theory you could have multiple children per day with asian women, thereby spreading caucasian DNA.

But I'm among the people who don't believe that ethnic mixing is a good thing. At least when you settle down to have children find a white woman.

[–]Space_Tourist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sadly the ones I've dated want to be a house wife with none of the corresponding duties, or they want to act like the man in a relationship with lifelong career aspirations. My current girlfriend is from a very traditional Asian family and she cooks, cleans, and fucks me whenever I want.

I understand what you are getting at; its kind of sad that in a number of generations people will look back on the concept of race and wonder what it was like to have such drastically different looking people all with their own unique cultures. But I think by sticking with my own race I would simply be delaying the inevitable, potentially at the expense of my own happiness.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

its kind of sad that in a number of generations people will look back on the concept of race and wonder what it was like to have such drastically different looking people all with their own unique cultures.

That's very unlikely. It's quite possible that liberalism will be the flash in the pan-- after all this current multicultural nuttiness has only been around for a relatively short time (and look at all the damage it's done!) Cameron recently admitted that multiculturalism has been an abject failure.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I appreciate the message this person is trying to relate, however the person is rather anthropologically ignorant...they seem to think caucasian equals pale skin when in fact it does not. I am of Indian heritage and Indians are caucasian as are a whole host of other "visible minorities". This is what happens when technology falls into simpletons possesion...they just spew ignorance and ruin potentially important messages. I'm not suggesting the author is a simpleton but I am saying they don't know what a caucasian is.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Caucasian is basically the American word for white. Arguing semantics and etymology are stupid and detract from the argument.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Forgive me for disagreeing with you. I fail to see how science falls into the cesspool of semantics. Do it right or don't do it at all. Locking down your position this way limits the oppositions arsenal of responses. Thereby ensuring your message is taken seriously...just a thought.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Forgive me for disagreeing with you. I fail to see how science falls into the cesspool of semantics.

Don't be a pompous ass, the American general use of caucasian is far from scientific. The term black and white aren't very ambiguous yet they are not scientific either. People use arguments like this to deconstruct the idea of race but it's a continuum fallacy.

Classifying Dravidian Indians as "caucasian" is not totally correct and using an Indo-European language does not suggest you are Indo-European yourself. Indians are a mixed people.

[–]through_a_ways 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Classifying Dravidian Indians as "caucasian" is not totally correct and using an Indo-European language does not suggest you are Indo-European yourself. Indians are a mixed people.

By that logic, Finns aren't of the same race as other Europeans? You committed the same exact fallacy that you accused him of using.

Indians are mixed, as are Europeans. The idea that anyone alive today is "Indo-European" is laughable.

This might help you

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

There are many Finns with Sami heritage, they are not "white".

You can try to use continuum fallacies about how "everyone is mixed" but race will never actually be a social construct.

[–]through_a_ways 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You can try to use continuum fallacies about how "everyone is mixed" but race will never actually be a social construct

You're strawmanning here, especially after I sent you that map. I'm assuming you're either dense or trolling. Bye.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

especially after I sent you that map

Don't tell me you think that map proves anything other than white it claims to prove?

As you can see from your map "white people" are pretty distinct from other caucasoid groups. The US definition of Caucasian is pretty clear for meaning that particular group of white people. Getting high and mighty about the definition of Caucasian detracts from the argument which was my original point. The article in question has nothing to do with whether Indians are Caucasians or not but some clown had to bring up that Caucasian includes those people so the article is somehow invalid.

That's pathetic. The article even refers to white caucasian ethnicity. Why does some pedantic faggot have to have a problem with that. This is reminiscent of feminists and manginas having a problem with everything.

[–]through_a_ways 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

You can try to use continuum fallacies about how "everyone is mixed" but race will never actually be a social construct.

I never said anything of the sort, the fact that I sent you that link proves I believe the opposite.

There are many Finns with Sami heritage, they are not "white".

So Finns with some Sami heritage aren't white (even though most basically look it), but you still see nothing wrong with using a ridiculous term like "caucasian" to describe white people? Please tell me you see the obvious dissonance here.

As you can see from your map "white people" are pretty distinct from other caucasoid groups.

Yes, and there's still a seemingly genetic basis for "caucasoid", or "caucasian".

Classifying Dravidian Indians as "caucasian" is not totally correct

Looking at that map, I can quite clearly see the shape of India. Looks like "Indo Aryans" and "Dravidians" are largely genetically similar, just like Finns/Hungarians and the rest of Europe.

Getting high and mighty about the definition of Caucasian detracts from the argument which was my original point.

No, but I don't see anything wrong with discussing that.

Why does some pedantic faggot have to have a problem with that.

You sound like an overly aggressive, anti-intellectual douche. And as far as I can tell, nobody said anything about race "not existing", or "only being a social construct" (it's both biological and social), or anything adhering to the continuum fallacy. You're just building scarecrows everywhere.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So Finns with some Sami heritage aren't white (even though most basically look it), but you still see nothing wrong with using a ridiculous term like "caucasian" to describe white people? Please tell me you see the obvious dissonance here.

Here's your continuum fallacy again. You're trying to disprove my point with the fact that "everyone is mixed". White is an ambiguous classification, not scientific. Finns on the whole are white but you see the Lapps marked well above Finland? There's been a significant amount of admixture with them. It will depend on the individual Finns heritage as Finns are a diverse group. They are however a lot closer than anything possibly Dravidian to the rest of the European groups.

Yes, and there's still a seemingly genetic basis for "caucasoid", or "caucasian".

Never said otherwise. Let's get back to the original premise, what is wrong with the article? Some pedantic faggot had to pick apart the wording. Now you want to paint me as anti-intellectual for not caring about the anthropomorphic (a scientific field corrupted by jewry if there ever was one) classification in an opinion piece that was clearly talking about White Europeans in the social context. It's irrelevant.

[–]TheNicestMonkey 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The term black and white aren't very ambiguous yet they are not scientific either.

Yeah. But in this case they'd be correct. He's dressing up his argument with words like "Caucasian" when he really just means "the subset of Caucasian people who look sufficiently like me that I identify with them" (which is obviously not specific at all ... does this include irish people, southern europeans, poles - who the fuck knows?).

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Race =/= culture.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

So basically it should read "white caucasian" rather than "caucasian" for pedants sake, because, obviously, turks for instance who are also technically caucasian contemporarily label themselves as such? Of course they don't. They'd more likely identify as "European - Other" or "Arab" This is all just technicality and perception now by the way, pure pedanticism. Read any census. It will say Caucasian - White, Caucasian - Irish, Caucasian - French etc etc etc. It would not say "Caucasian - Indian" it would say "Asian - Indian" or just "Indian" depending on the specific country/census. To ignore the contemporary usage of ethnic classification is somewhat ignorant.

You are technically correct but really I think the pedantism is a little obnoxious more than anything, how many visible minorities identify as caucasians? Not many I'd be willing to bet, it's used to identify those with white skin in the contemporary.

[–]TheNicestMonkey 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact of the matter is that "white caucasian" is itself non specific and various groups have been included / excluded from that classification at various periods in time.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

"To ignore the contemporary usage of ethnic classification is somewhat ignorant". C'mon now just because something is contemporarily accepted does not make it correct...it just makes it accepted. Just because gov census forms were written by dummies does not bolster your point about how people identify themselves, it just provides evidence that they had no other option available on the INCORRECT FORM, I don't mean to hijack this thread but I'll be damned if I will forgo science and accuracy so that I may aspire to ignorant common acceptance...ignorance and common blind acceptance is the major factor this sub even exists...think about that (please).

Edit: Thank you for the gold whoever gave it to me.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I concede you're anthropologically correct. I won't say anymore as I don't think it would be productive, I think we've both contributed our opinions. Thank you for your input, I appreciate it vastly (no sarcasm)

[–]RedSunBlue -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is neither here nor there with regards to the content of your post, but dang, you got some long-ass sentences in there.

[–]MarkarthAlchemist -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"dang" and "long-ass" make you look low class.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As always ;)

[–]30years -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm having trouble seeing our government being long-term thinkers enough to say "a multi-decade period of feminism and immigration will preserve and expand the tax base." In my observation, politicians rarely think beyond their own self-interest and next election.

Enlighten me.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Think of it in the now then.

Aging population, pensions need paying for a generation where birth rate was much higher among other government ambitions. Feminism has made government big and costly. More retirees and lower birth rate equals less people in the work force paying the needed taxes so rather than look ahead they open the doors of immigration and get the extra labour immediately.

The lack of foresight comes when the immigrants stay and never go home, they'll need a pension too and with a low birth rate the future government will do the same shit and thus the cycle continues. Other than a war countries have no reason for absolute labour shortages, automation creates excess labour units, feminism however significantly contributed towards a declining birth rate which we can attribute to many of today's problems. Civil rights aren't bad but the prevalence of career over family certainly is.

[+]ozymodeus -8 points-7 points-6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is easily compensated for. Players need to focus more on married women and stop caring about STDs. married women will pretend it belongs to the husband so you have minimal risk of being tied down with child support. but you do have a high risk of STDs but come on, were you planning on living forever? Also try to remember the last time a girl asked you to put a condom on.

Also assuming this is true, the primary members of our race dying off will be betas and we'll all be better off for it. Personally I don't see why we should care.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

stop caring about STDs

You lost me there. Not good advice.

Personally I don't see why we should care.

This isn't a call to arms, more of an explanation of the ideological landscape and the part its played.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter