AWALT

Xein · 2014-01-20T18:42:01+00:00

I don't get caught up in the NAWALT - AWALT argument. Statistically, AWALT is usually the correct assumption. That being said, there are always outliers and exceptions.

It's not really a useful discussion though. Nobody can guarantee AWALT 100% of the time, but it doesn't matter. AWALT tends to be true almost all the time, so we treat it as such. There will always be anecdotal evidence of NAWALT, but it is rare.

RedBigMan · 2014-01-20T18:07:54+00:00

AWALT. Full Stop.

Your mother is like that. Your sister is like that. Your aunt is like that. Your niece is like that. Your girlfriend is like that. Your wife is like that.

I think the biggest thing in my ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT is the women's predisposition to solipsism. It's all about them and it's always about them. Even when they're talking about you it's about them (your mom talking up your accomplishments is basically her going 'look at me I raised this good strong man!).

Just look up Toby Keith's video 'I like talking about you'...

Also there was a video of 1 vs 100 (an episode with one guy vs 100 women) where there was a question about which holiday gets the most greeting cards sold... Valentines Day, Mother's Day or Christmas. EVERY SINGLE WOMAN picked the wrong answer (the right one was Christmas btw).

I asked the same question to my mom and got the response from her... "Mother's Day". That day pretty much solidified my AWALT. It is not a bad thing either because you have to remember as a man the only woman who will love you unconditionally is not your girlfriend or wife but your mother.

As men uneducated in the way the world really works (blue pill) we strike out into the world blind looking for a woman who has the same capacity for love as your mother but the sooner you realize that is never going to happen and realize that a LTR or marriage is actually a lot of work the better off you will be. The long story made short... There is no unicorn. AWALT.

LMS_THEORY_ · 2014-01-20T20:58:38+00:00

UNICORNS.

DON'T.

EXIST.

itzth3d00d · 2014-01-20T17:04:18+00:00

Women are only NAWALT when you are a man and the best prospect for her. She will only act like a unicorn and appear to be that way when she values you and your relationship with her that highly. If you keep your frame up in a LTR and you're sharp enough to keep it up for the entirety, you did find a unicorn. But when you slip up, break frame and lose control, she isn't a unicorn anymore and she will act exactly like any other woman would when she thinks she can replace you with a better mate.

So basically, AWALT unless you know enough about TRP to keep the frame of your relationship in your favor. The sidebar "Relationships, The Red Pill, and You" has the best info on this kind of stuff. If you aren't the leader and look to your girl for justification, you set yourself and your relationship up for failure.

Once you swallow the pill, you take responsibility for any failure in future relationships and understand that unicorns don't exist, they are created by your value, your SMV, and your frame in a relationship.

mordanus · 2014-01-20T21:56:10+00:00

All women are justifiers of their own shitty behavior. AKA the hamster. Anytime a woman does something that she should feel guilty about she will spin it until it makes her emotions make her into the good guy. It's not her fault, she deserves better, she's a good person etc. It even goes to the point of re-recording her memories into a positive light for herself. She will literally not remember things as they were but instead remember them as how she wanted them to be in her favor. All women are like that.

robesta · 2014-01-21T00:56:58+00:00

AWALT, some are just better at controlling their impulses. You may have a tiger trained, but it's still a fucking tiger.

Source: Sigfried and Roy

PlayFair · 2014-01-21T03:09:04+00:00

Why do you think all women fucking love it when someone puts them on a pedestal?

They love the power. All women, my friend, are like that.

BoyMeetsHarem · 2014-01-21T03:34:21+00:00

To me, this comes down to proper poker strategy. Anyone who has played Texas hold'em knows that the odds rarely justify drawing to an inside straight. Does that mean inside straights never come in on the river? Not at all, but keep betting they will and you're gonna lose your shirt.

Play the odds fellas. Assume they are low value sluts until proven otherwise and act accordingly.

HeadingRed · 2014-01-20T19:31:05+00:00

AWALT or NAWALT? Don't try to decide, that's impossible. Instead try to understand the truth - there is no spoon.

AWALT would give you guidelines for all of the time. NAWALT would give you guidelines for most of the time. Therefore stay AWALT all of the time unless you are want to test changing a winning formula for one that has lower odds of success. And are willing to live with the consequences.

trplurker · 2014-01-21T09:23:25+00:00

NAWALT is something people like to tell themselves when their in the negotiating phase. "Only some are, only those girls are, only blah blah", yeah it's their mind attempting to deal with the cognitive dissonance that taking the red pill brings.

Ultimately all women have the same nature, they all follow the same biological instincts and they all will do what their emotional center perceives is in their biology's best interest. All women can be turned into sluts under the right conditions, all women are hypergamous and all women are solipsistic. This is not a bad thing, this is not a good thing, it mere is. Women are not men, they don't think like men nor do they have the same biological drives as men. So men need to stop attempting to rationalize women as though they were men.

How a women treats you (a men) is simply a function of what utility her subconscious animal see's in you. If you have no utility then she'll ignore your existence and if your somehow getting in her way or present a danger to her biology then she'll outright hate and be disgusted with you. If you have no sexual utility but still serve to feed her emotional need for validation and male attention, then she'll be nice to you and keep you around (congrats your her beta orbiter). And if she feels you can provide for her sexually then she'll be really nice to you and sexually responsive / flirty. If your the highest sexual object she can currently acquire, she'll do absolutely ANYTHING for you.

I have manipulated and dominated too many women, nice girls, bad girls, sweet girls and nasty bitch's, to ever fall for the "NAWALT" line. AWALT because I can make them that way.

batfish55 · 2014-01-20T20:17:00+00:00

It just occurred to me that I've never heard anything along the lines of 'Not all guys are like that'.

widec · 2014-01-20T19:38:32+00:00

Another thread reminded me of a good example. A single mother will care about her children more than she cares about any new guy she dates.

Fitch0y · 2014-01-20T16:41:48+00:00

There are 5 archetypes of women. But they all do share certain traits.

NB: NAWALT was most commonly used as a term to explain someone that he should next his girl, because there are much more better women who are not like that.

Now it is often used to describe unicorns.

TRPtruth · 2014-01-21T05:55:41+00:00

However, there are some traits that are universally constant. No matter how much people can try to rationalize against them, they will stay true.

I see your point, but I'm having a hard time with this statement. In the contest of female craziness, there are no universal truths. We can talk in generalities and probabilities, and base our opinions on research and experience, but at the end of the day you have to accept a level of fluidity in any interaction with a woman.

If there was AWALT, we could easily come up with a computer program to dictate how to interact with all women and just run the program. That obviously does not work.

Are most women hypergamous? Yes. Do most women run the hamster wheel? Yes. Are most women ready to branch swing at a moment's notice? Yes. Are they ALL like that? No.

Saying AWALT is just as self-defeating as saying NAWALT, both are absolutes.

But since you ask, probably the closest AWALT I can think of is "can't turn a ho to a housewife." I've heard some arguments here saying this isn't 100%, but I personally think it's a 100%, no LTR with a ho or recovering ho. In fact, I try to avoid them all together.

TheD_ · 2014-01-20T22:35:55+00:00

I guess where I disagree with TRP hypothesis is with respect to solipsism. Anecdotally, I've met men and women who engage in solipsism/rationalization. It's an attribute that is not unique to either gender. Men will hampster just as hard as chicks. Whereas, women will hampster about relationships, men tend to hampster about their athletic performance (crap, do I know a lot of mid-late twenties ex-football players who are convinced the reason they are not in the NFL is because of college coaches/injuries).

Title	AWALT
Author	widec
Upvotes	20
Comments	50
Date	January 20, 2014 4:32 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1voi1h/awalt/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/awalt.10207 https://theredarchive.com/post/10207

Comments