AWALT and AMALT

always-be-closing · 2015-12-12T23:01:57+00:00

Male and female reproductive desires are both non-monogamous but not in the same way.

We are rate, they are capacity.

The male animal wants 1000 different female to have sex with so that they can have as many reproductive opportunities to ensure his immortality. His efforts must be distributed, rapid, and constant.

The female animal wants only the best, and better male so that she can have the best reproductive opportunity to ensure her immortality. Her efforts must be calculated, singular, and scrutinizing.

We have a penetrative organ, she has a receptive one.

Our semen is basic in pH, hers acidic - - her orgasm is correlated with our material status and earning, and literally hastens through muscle contraction our sperm to her egg.

Millions of instances of our genetic code strive and swim onward and perish and one with the greatest motility will succeed in breaching the defenses of her ovum's wall.

Our refractory period is shortened when we see novel fertile women, and we are ready for sex again.

Her libido is lower and lower each year.

Our paternity is an inference and we are jealous and anxious of not having been there first, or not striking hard enough, or not bearing the result of our investment in our (her) young.

Her maternity is a biological fact, and she is envious and anxious of better investments or provisions for her young.

Thus our "cheating" at the rules of the game, perpetuity, was (and still is in form, not result) by attempting to reproduce with simply as many as possible.

Lemme fuck Karen and Tiffany and Susan and Jamie and Laura, etc.

Their "cheating" at the rules of the game, perpetuity, was (and is still in form and result both) by attempting to reproduce with the best genes and secure the best material provision, dualistically, instead of settling for a singular man's optimization of each (but never a complete and total embodiment of each)

Lemme fuck Chad and get Billy to pay for it.

We wander in the field, they swing branch to branch.

This all gets hidden under the veneer of a sexual marketplace that has been divorced (heh) from the reproductive realities at work in our biology, but it was the basis of marriage meant to civilize and formalize the sexual marketplace as it existed before we got a perverted form of the natural one whose hypergamy in women we've exaggerated and whose virility in men we've actually further clamped down on.

Women have turned into a warped caricature, and men have turned into a shadowy outline, of their true selves by modern sexual/legal realities.

All the games from the shenanigans at the bar to the fights over spending time at home, all the rituals from asking them out on dates or to put a coat over them, all the strategies - - it's all a deep biological imperative whose basic commands are written so fundamentally far into our primal nature that its operation overrides everything, even when it gets the BIOS of civilization, OS like marriage, and buggy glitchy stuff in software updates like thirdwave feminism.

Never feel shame for attempting to fulfill your priorities, be they biologically motivated or logical conclusions of your high level thought.

The rest of the world; women, powerful men, hostile men, etc. sure fucking don't.

stonepimpletilists · 2015-12-12T21:20:11+00:00

All men are like that

Sure we are, luckily I don't want to fuck men, so it's outside of the scope of my concern.

You think we don't know there are fucking abusive men out there? monsters who slap their women around? freeloaders that take all their money and buy shit with it, drug dealer types that are absolutely poisonous to women?

Luckily, they have the means to deal with it, support systems, sisterhood bullshit, they've got that locked down.

Right now I'm worried about women, because they are the ones I will deal with romantically. All the stuff you talk about is personal growth. I'm finding it comes once a guy is able to get laid semi regularily.

The kind of kid you see in here who is full of anger tends to be the one who never got laid. he has no abundance mentality because he hasn't had abundance. Though he will hit the gym, learn some frame, and start sleeping with women, and finally have that mindset, where he can start his personal growth.

It's just the way it is, unfortunately most of the half cocked posts are from those who are still angry, and you have to cull your list if you want to get to the kind of person you wish there were more of in here.

Luckily, I have a method if you are there: Friend all the endorsed contributors, use a RES filter for all the flair here, ignore everything but red pill examples, field reports, LTR, and fitness, then click on friends instead of just the sub.

right there you cut out 90% of the noise ratio

Coolbeans024ptf · 2015-12-12T21:12:31+00:00

From the tone of your post I'd say you've learned far less than you think you have. Proceed with caution, your future is dim until you change your shit attitude. Try not to be such a tard face in the future, we have enough douchery as it is. You are welcome for the sound advice 👍.

Syzmatiq · 2015-12-12T21:36:41+00:00

Can I ask why you don't give a shit about females? I love women, TRP made me love being around them, now i know how to act anyway.

SatanAscending · 2015-12-13T02:48:50+00:00

What is hypergamy then? Because honestly I think you think hypergamy is "~monogamy", or "not-monogamy", if you prefer that form of notation.

Basically that would be wrong way o thinking. If that is not what OP conveyed, tough shit. Still it needs to be said, for those that may interpret this post poorly, like I do.

I want to note that I am not a native speaker, I may get some phrasings wrong.

Yes, men are not monogamous. We don't want by default our "One and only love to live together happily everafter". No "soulmates", no "unicorns, no "little princesses". If any of these concepts appeared in your head, know it is a byproduct of what you observed (likely in media, perhaps disney, perhaps something else), scarcity mentality ("if only that girl noticed me"), and Oneitis (One-it-is, biological male bonding mechanism that appeared to get men to provide for offsprings).

Yet, hypergamy means following the Feminine Imperative, which demands the best possible seed and the best possible social support. What our Imperative demands is our own seed and as many fertile wombs possible.

And thus, AMALT. Would I dare to call it Masculine Imperative? Perhaps it already has a name and I just didn't get that. Who knows.

If anything, I'd call man polygamous. They are capable of having multiple mates and different offsprings.

And yes, both parties have a lot to gain in it. Still our motives, ways and goals differ by default.

Hypergamy is not a monogamy.
Hypergamy is not a non-monogamy.
Hypergamy is a term that conveys concepts of Feminine Imperative.
Men are polygamous, not hypergamous.

Yakatonker · 2015-12-13T12:18:33+00:00

Its makes one think does it not about the economy of human behaviour. If we are all like this not just with women but in life on a micro scale could you imagine how this echos across the social macro? Makes one wonder why there are so many social engineering platforms out there, feminism included. Possibly to blunt the deficiencies of the human animal by radically altering the economical outliers of our environment?

IVIaskerade · 2015-12-15T13:09:14+00:00

Tell you what. Save an archive of this post, and in a year, come back to it. If you don't feel the urge to slap the shit out of past!you for this steaming pile of drek, you should seek professional help because you're unable to experience personal growth.

Sunny32k · 2015-12-15T21:04:11+00:00

I find this post pure horse shit. Even in the way you write it. Take a step back, keep reading from TRP and re evaluate yourself

creatorman · 2015-12-12T21:24:18+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Title	AWALT and AMALT
Author	creatorman
Upvotes	0
Comments	15
Date	December 12, 2015 9:05 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3wk7aa/awalt_and_amalt/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/awalt-and-amalt.38854 https://theredarchive.com/post/38854

Comments